Navigating the Costs: 12 States Where Driving an Electric Vehicle Will Cost You More in Annual Fees

The evolution of the automotive industry, marked by the rapid adoption of electric vehicles (EVs), presents a significant shift in how public road and infrastructure projects are funded across the United States. Historically, these vital budgets have been largely sustained by revenues from gasoline taxes, a system that intuitively connects road usage with financial contributions. The more miles driven, the more gasoline consumed, and consequently, the more tax paid—a well-designed user fee that ensures those benefiting most from public roads help maintain them. However, as EVs gain market share, this traditional funding mechanism faces an undeniable challenge.

Electric vehicles, by their very nature, do not consume gasoline, thus bypassing the gas tax that has long served as a fiscal cornerstone for road maintenance and development. This erosion of the gas tax’s ability to fund essential projects creates a growing fiscal gap, even as the demand for improved road infrastructure continues to climb. States are now grappling with the complex task of balancing environmental incentives for lower-emission vehicles with the pragmatic need to secure adequate funding for their transportation networks.

In response to this intricate dilemma, states have begun to implement a diverse array of tax policies, ranging from direct purchase tax credits to, more commonly, higher annual registration fees for EV ownership. While these fees are often justified as modest efforts to compensate for the absence of gas tax collections, they represent a tangible shift in the financial landscape for EV drivers. This article will explore 12 states where driving an electric vehicle will entail higher annual costs through registration fees, providing a detailed look at the various approaches states are taking to address the evolving transportation sector.

city skyline across body of water during daytime — Photo by Manisha Raghunath on Unsplash

1. **New Jersey**New Jersey currently stands out with one of the highest annual registration fees for electric vehicles, set at $260. This significant charge is part of a broader strategy to address the fiscal challenges posed by the increasing number of EVs on its roads. The state’s approach reflects a clear move towards ensuring that all road users contribute equitably to infrastructure maintenance, irrespective of their vehicle’s propulsion method.

The introduction of this fee for EVs in New Jersey is a relatively recent development, having been enacted in 2024. This timing aligns with a national trend where more states are recognizing the need to update their revenue streams as the automotive landscape transforms. The state has also stipulated that this fee will not remain static, but rather will increase by $10 annually through fiscal year 2029, demonstrating a proactive stance in adapting its revenue policies over time.

It is worth noting that while New Jersey has implemented a substantial annual registration fee, it also previously offered purchase incentives for EVs. The context mentions that New Jersey provides an EV purchase incentive of up to $4,000, available as a rebate rather than a tax credit. This dual approach of incentivizing adoption while also introducing user fees highlights the complex balancing act states undertake in promoting green initiatives while simultaneously addressing fiscal responsibilities.

an aerial view of a castle with a lake in the background — Photo by Haris khan on Unsplash

2. **Georgia**Georgia imposes a notable annual registration fee for electric vehicles, calculated at $234.97 for Fiscal Year 2024. This fee is among the higher end of state charges for EV ownership and reflects the state’s efforts to offset the diminishing gas tax revenues as EV adoption increases. The state’s policy demonstrates a direct response to the fiscal gap created by non-gasoline consuming vehicles using public roads.

A distinctive feature of Georgia’s fee structure is its mechanism for annual adjustment. State law mandates that the fee be adjusted by multiplying the percentage of increase or decrease in the U.S. average miles per gallon (mpg) against the current fee. This dynamic adjustment ensures that the fee remains responsive to changes in national fuel efficiency standards and potentially the overall impact of vehicles on road infrastructure.

Beyond registration fees, Georgia is also one of several states that has explored alternative revenue streams from EVs, specifically imposing a tax per kilowatt-hour distributed by charging stations. While such a user fee aims to equalize treatment between combustion engines and EVs, the context notes that this method can sometimes fall short of fully accounting for EV road use, particularly for those who primarily charge their vehicles at home. Despite these varied approaches, Georgia’s comprehensive strategy indicates a concerted effort to adapt to the evolving transportation sector.

white van parked beside white building during daytime — Photo by Jahongir ismoilov on Unsplash

3. **Indiana**Indiana has established a significant annual registration fee for electric vehicles, set at $230. This amount positions Indiana among the states with higher costs for EV ownership, reflecting a clear policy decision to recoup lost gas tax revenues from zero-emission vehicles. The state’s fee structure is designed to ensure that EV users contribute to the maintenance and improvement of road infrastructure.

Like some other states, Indiana’s EV registration fee is subject to annual adjustments. The context specifies that this adjustment averages changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and Indiana personal income. This formula aims to keep the fee aligned with economic realities and the cost of living, providing a systematic approach to update the charges over time rather than relying on intermittent legislative interventions.

The revenue collected from these fees in Indiana is directed towards specific infrastructure initiatives. The context indicates that funds are placed into a ‘local road and bridge matching grant fund.’ This allocation highlights a practical application of the fees, directly connecting EV user contributions to tangible improvements in local transportation networks. Such a direct link can help justify the imposition of these fees to the public, demonstrating how their payments directly benefit the community’s infrastructure.

a view of a highway from inside a vehicle — Photo by Leiada Krözjhen on Unsplash

4. **North Carolina**North Carolina levies an annual registration fee of $214.50 for electric vehicles. This substantial fee reflects a deliberate policy choice to address the financial implications of increasing EV adoption, particularly concerning funding for public roads and infrastructure. The state has actively increased this fee in recent years, demonstrating an evolving stance on EV taxation.

In fact, the registration fee for electric vehicles in North Carolina saw a notable increase from $140.25 to $214.50, as reported in the major changes since July 2023. This significant adjustment underscores the state’s commitment to adapting its revenue strategies in light of the growing EV market. The fee ensures that EV drivers contribute a comparable amount to road maintenance as their gasoline-powered counterparts, who pay through fuel taxes.

North Carolina was an early adopter of EV fees, initially enacting its charges in 2013. This long-standing engagement with EV taxation suggests a mature approach to integrating electric vehicles into the state’s financial planning for transportation. While the state has not been listed as offering an EV purchase tax credit in the provided 2025 data, its focus has been firmly on the ‘user fee’ aspect of EV road usage.

5. **Alabama**Alabama assesses an annual registration fee of $203 for electric vehicles, placing it among the states with higher charges for EV ownership. This fee is part of Alabama’s strategy to ensure that all vehicles utilizing the state’s road network contribute to its upkeep, thereby compensating for the absence of gasoline tax contributions from EV users. The state’s policy is a clear acknowledgment of the need to maintain infrastructure funding in a changing automotive landscape.

A distinct feature of Alabama’s EV fee structure is its predetermined adjustment schedule. The law specifies that its fees will increase by $3 every four years, with this incremental rise having commenced in 2023. This set, periodic increase provides a predictable path for future fee adjustments, allowing both the state to plan its revenues and EV owners to anticipate future costs.

Furthermore, Alabama has a multi-faceted approach to how these collected fees are utilized. The context indicates that the revenues are divided between the general transportation fund, a local transportation fund, and an EV infrastructure fund. This allocation strategy is designed to support a broad range of transportation needs, from general road maintenance to specific investments in the EV charging infrastructure that facilitates the very vehicles being taxed, creating a somewhat circular funding model.

6. **Texas**Texas has implemented a significant fee structure for electric vehicles, differentiating between new registrations and renewals. For new EV registrations, the fee is set at a substantial $400, while subsequent annual renewals incur a $200 charge. This policy reflects a strong intent to address the fiscal implications of EVs not contributing to gasoline tax revenues, particularly given Texas’s vast road network.

The higher initial fee for new EV registrations could be seen as an effort to capture a larger contribution upfront from new entrants to the EV market. This approach acknowledges the immediate impact of new zero-emission vehicles on the road funding system. The renewal fee, while still considerable, offers a more sustained, annual contribution to ongoing road maintenance and development.

Texas is another state that recently introduced new registration fees for electric vehicles, with the implementation occurring in 2023. This recent action highlights the growing urgency among states to adapt their tax policies to the evolving transportation sector. While the state does not currently offer an EV purchase tax credit, its focus remains on ensuring that EV users contribute their share to the critical infrastructure they utilize, thereby addressing the fiscal gap created by the shift away from gasoline consumption.”}

Continuing our in-depth exploration of how states are adapting their revenue strategies to the rise of electric vehicles, this section delves into six more states. We’ll examine diverse approaches, including pioneering Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) tax programs and unique methods of fund allocation. These examples further illustrate the complex balancing act states perform to ensure equitable contributions to road infrastructure while navigating the shift towards sustainable transportation.

a river running through a forest — Photo by Leo_Visions on Unsplash

7. **Oregon**Oregon has established an annual registration fee of $115 for electric vehicles, positioning itself among states that require EV owners to contribute directly to road funding. This fee is a clear response to the decreased gas tax revenue that comes with a growing number of zero-emission vehicles on the road. The state’s approach reflects a commitment to maintaining its transportation infrastructure through a broader base of user contributions.

What truly sets Oregon apart, however, is its innovative Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) tax program. Drivers with vehicles rated above 20 miles per gallon (mpg), including EVs, are given the option to pay a charge of $0.02 per mile driven instead of the standard annual registration fee. This alternative system comes with a reduced annual registration fee of $86, providing flexibility for drivers and a more direct correlation between road usage and financial contribution.

Oregon’s VMT program is not a new concept; it was a pioneering initiative, enacted in 2013, making it one of the earliest states to implement such a system. The mileage driven is accurately tracked through either an odometer plugin or a telematic device, ensuring fairness and transparency. This forward-thinking approach positions Oregon at the forefront of designing sustainable funding models for future transportation needs, moving beyond traditional fuel-based taxation.

8. **Utah**Utah imposes an annual registration fee of $130.25 for electric vehicles, a measure designed to help offset the revenue gap left by EVs not contributing to gasoline taxes. This fee ensures that all road users participate in the funding of the state’s extensive transportation network. It represents a direct strategy to address the evolving fiscal landscape in the age of electric mobility.

Similar to Oregon, Utah offers an innovative alternative through its Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) program. Electric vehicle drivers have the option to pay $0.0111 per mile driven instead of the full annual registration fee. This per-mile charge is capped at the value of the state’s electric vehicle registration fee, preventing excessive costs for high-mileage drivers while still linking contributions to actual road usage. The program was enacted in 2020 and utilizes a user-friendly app for mileage tracking, streamlining the process for EV owners.

Furthermore, Utah’s fee structure includes provisions for annual adjustments, ensuring it remains responsive to economic conditions. These adjustments are based on changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), reflecting a commitment to keep the fees aligned with the cost of living and the real value of infrastructure investments. This systematic approach to fee modification provides predictability for both the state’s budget planners and EV drivers.

wide-angle photography of buildings during daytime — Photo by STEPHEN POORE on Unsplash

9. **Virginia**Virginia levies an annual registration fee for electric vehicles set at $131.88. Notably, this amount is explicitly calculated as a function of vehicle miles driven, a sophisticated approach to ensure that contributions to road infrastructure are directly proportional to road usage. This formulaic method underscores Virginia’s commitment to creating a fair and sustainable funding model for its transportation system.

The state’s innovative Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) tax program allows drivers with vehicles rated above 25 miles per gallon, including electric vehicles, to opt into a per-mile payment system. For EV drivers, this value is set at $0.0114 per mile. This offers an alternative to the flat fee, providing a more precise user-fee mechanism. Mileage tracking is handled through an On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) plugin, ensuring accurate data collection for these charges.

Virginia’s engagement with alternative funding mechanisms has evolved over time. While initial EV fees were enacted in 2014, the state significantly reduced its standard registration fees in 2020. Simultaneously, it introduced its Highway Use Fee and the Mileage-based User Fee Program, demonstrating a decisive shift towards VMT-based taxation. The statutory formula for the highway use fee considers 85 percent of the difference in motor fuel taxes paid for a vehicle with a combined fuel economy of 23.7 mpg and the vehicle being registered, over the average number of miles traveled in the Commonwealth.

This comprehensive strategy not only targets electric vehicles but also applies its highway use fee to other alternative fuel and hybrid vehicles, ensuring broad participation. Virginia’s commitment to regularly adjusting these fees based on miles driven signifies a dynamic and forward-looking approach to funding its vital road infrastructure, aiming for equity across all vehicle types.

a group of people walking along a beach next to the ocean — Photo by Luke Scarpino on Unsplash

10. **Hawaii**Hawaii currently imposes a modest annual registration fee of $50 for electric vehicles. This fee is part of the state’s broader effort to collect revenue from all vehicles using its roads, recognizing that EV drivers do not contribute through traditional gasoline taxes. The charge supports the maintenance and development of Hawaii’s unique and vital road network.

Looking ahead, Hawaii is set to launch its innovative HiRUC program on July 1, 2025. This Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) program will give electric vehicle drivers the choice to either continue paying the $50 flat annual fee or transition to a per-mile payment of $0.008. This opt-in system provides flexibility for EV owners and allows for a more direct link between road usage and funding contributions.

A particularly interesting aspect of Hawaii’s VMT program is its method of mileage measurement. The state plans to rely on odometer readings, a practical solution that largely avoids the common privacy concerns associated with GPS tracking. Furthermore, Hawaii’s unique geographic situation, being an island state, means that odometer-only reporting is highly likely to avoid the issue of taxing out-of-state travel, making it an efficient and fitting solution for the region.

11. **Pennsylvania**Pennsylvania has recently introduced new registration fees for electric vehicles, with an annual charge of $200 for 2025. This substantial fee reflects the state’s proactive steps to secure adequate funding for its transportation infrastructure as EV adoption continues to grow. The implementation of these fees in 2023 was a significant policy change, underscoring the urgency felt by many states to adapt their revenue streams.

This fee structure is not static; Pennsylvania’s law specifies a predetermined increase. The annual registration fee for EVs is set to rise to $250 in 2026, and after that, it will be adjusted annually. These future adjustments will be based on an average of changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), starting in 2027. This built-in adjustment mechanism ensures the fee’s value keeps pace with economic realities and the rising costs of infrastructure maintenance.

It is worth noting that while Pennsylvania is implementing these fees, it also offers some incentives, albeit with limitations. The state provides purchase rebates for electric vehicles, though these are limited to 500 rebates for the period between July 2025 and July 2026. This dual approach signifies Pennsylvania’s effort to balance the promotion of cleaner vehicles with the essential need to fund its public roads effectively, highlighting the ongoing evolution of state-level EV policies.

12. **Washington**Washington state has implemented an annual registration fee of $150 for electric vehicles, reflecting its strategic move to ensure that all drivers contribute to the upkeep of its extensive road network. This fee, enacted in 2019, addresses the fiscal gap created by electric vehicles not contributing through traditional gasoline taxes, reinforcing the principle of user-pays for road infrastructure.

Beyond the direct registration fee, Washington has also been actively exploring more nuanced funding solutions. The state has notably run significant Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) pilot programs, indicating a strong interest in shifting towards a system where road usage contributions are directly tied to the miles driven. These pilot programs are crucial for gathering data and understanding the feasibility and public acceptance of such advanced taxation models.

Furthermore, Washington employs a thoughtful approach to how the revenues collected from these fees are utilized. The funds are divided, allocated between the state’s general transportation fund and a dedicated fund for EV infrastructure. This dual allocation strategy is particularly forward-thinking, as it not only supports existing road maintenance but also invests directly in the charging infrastructure necessary to facilitate further EV adoption, creating a self-sustaining ecosystem for electric mobility.

The landscape of electric vehicle taxation is continuously evolving, reflecting a dynamic response to the changing transportation sector. As more EVs hit the roads, states will undoubtedly continue to refine these policies, aiming for fairness, sustainability, and efficiency in funding the infrastructure we all rely on. Staying informed about these developments is key for every EV owner and prospective buyer, as these fees directly impact the overall cost of ownership. The goal remains to create a robust and equitable system that supports modern transportation needs for years to come.