The allure of a new car is undeniable. That fresh scent, the gleam of untouched paint, and the promise of reliable transportation or exhilarating performance can fill any driver with optimism. We envision smooth commutes, memorable road trips, and the effortless satisfaction of a finely tuned machine. However, as many seasoned motorists can attest, the reality of car ownership often diverges sharply from these initial dreams. The market is awash with choices, each promising a unique blend of style, efficiency, and capability. Yet, for every vehicle that lives up to its hype and cements its place in an owner’s heart, there are others that quietly — or not so quietly — become a source of profound regret.
In today’s automotive landscape, where new and used car prices have reached unprecedented levels, the decision to purchase a vehicle carries significant financial weight. Making an investment of tens of thousands of dollars, or committing to a multi-year loan, necessitates thorough due diligence beyond just attractive exterior aesthetics or impressive specification sheets. One of the most prudent paths to making a sound decision is to learn from the experiences, and indeed the mistakes, of those who have navigated the winding roads of vehicle ownership before us. It’s about understanding the candid, real-world disappointments that can arise long after the showroom shine has faded.
This in-depth exploration will shine a light on six specific sedans that, for various compelling reasons, have left a trail of disillusioned owners. A sedan, by its established definition, is a car featuring four doors and seating for at least four passengers, offering a practical yet often stylish form of transport. The models we are about to scrutinize each represented a particular vision at their launch, but ultimately failed to deliver on core promises, leading many buyers to wish they could simply “erase” these vehicles from their ownership history. These are the tales of unmet expectations, mechanical frustrations, and the bitter taste of buyer’s remorse.
1. **Dodge Dart: A Compact Sedan, Full-Size Problems**When the Dodge Dart was introduced, it carried the weight of a storied nameplate and the promise of an American-badged compact sedan returning to prominence. However, what buyers ultimately received was a vehicle that swiftly gained a reputation as a compact car with an alarming array of full-size problems. From the moment keys were handed over, it became apparent that the Dart, despite its aspirations, was prone to issues that spanned nearly every critical system, quickly transforming initial excitement into outright frustration.
The litany of complaints from Dodge Dart owners painted a stark picture of a vehicle that struggled with fundamental reliability. Transmission woes were frequently cited, with owners reporting everything from erratic shifting to premature failure, turning daily drives into a gamble. The engine, too, often proved to be a weak point, exhibiting performance inconsistencies and a general lack of refinement. Beyond the powertrain, even components like the suspension and brakes, crucial for a comfortable and safe driving experience, became common sources of owner dissatisfaction, further eroding confidence in the vehicle’s overall quality.
This widespread discontent wasn’t just anecdotal; it was reflected in objective consumer surveys. According to insights from Consumer Reports, a significant majority of Dodge Dart buyers — approximately six out of ten — expressed outright dissatisfaction with their vehicle purchase. This statistic underscores a profound disconnect between what the Dart promised and what it delivered in terms of long-term ownership. For many, the Dart wasn’t just a car; it was a constant reminder of a misstep, a purchasing decision they would undoubtedly undo given the chance, emblematic of a compact sedan that simply couldn’t get out of its own way.
Car Model Information: 2015 Dodge Dart SXT
Name: Dodge Dart
Caption: 1966 Dodge Dart GT 2-door hardtop
Manufacturer: Dodge
Production: 1959–1976 (US market)
ModelYears: 1960–1976 (US market)
Class: Full-size
Layout: FR layout
Predecessor: Dodge Coronet#Fourth generation (1957–1959)
Related: Plymouth Valiant,Chrysler Valiant,Dodge Phoenix
Successor: Dodge Aspen,Dodge Diplomat,Talbot Tagora
Categories: 1970s cars, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from December 2023, Articles with unsourced statements from May 2025
Summary: The Dodge Dart is a line of passenger cars produced by Dodge from the 1959 to 1976 model years in North America, with production extended to later years in various other markets.
The production Dodge Dart was introduced as a lower-priced full-size model in 1960 and 1961, but became a mid-size car for one model year for 1962, and was then reduced to a compact for two generations, from 1963 to 1976.
Chrysler had first used ‘Dart’ name plates on two Italian styled show cars, in 1956 and 1957, before it became a Dodge model name. The Dart nameplate was resurrected for a Fiat-derived compact car that was introduced in 2012.
Get more information about: Dodge Dart
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Dodge Model: Dart
Price: $9,995 Mileage: 143,082 mi.
Read more about: A Costly Lesson Learned: 15 New Cars Buyers Would “Unbuy” to Escape Terrible Fuel Economy
2. **Nissan Sentra: The CVT Conundrum and Lingering Recalls**The Nissan Sentra, a long-standing fixture in the compact sedan segment, has, throughout its history, seen various iterations ranging from commendable to forgettable. While it’s fair to acknowledge that some model years offered a decent ownership experience, mirroring the variability seen across most vehicle lineups, certain generations of the Sentra have achieved a level of notoriety that owners would readily choose to forget. Specifically, the Sentra models manufactured between 2013 and 2019 are frequently highlighted as particularly problematic, largely due to a single, recurring mechanical grievance that became a pervasive thorn in the side of countless owners.
The central antagonist in the story of these regrettable Sentra model years was undoubtedly the Continuously Variable Transmission, or CVT. This particular transmission, intended to provide smooth acceleration and improved fuel efficiency, instead became synonymous with a host of deeply frustrating issues. Owners regularly reported instances of the CVT overheating, leading to reduced performance and potential damage. Furthermore, the supposed smoothness of the CVT was often undermined by “jerky acceleration and shuddering,” creating a jarring and unpredictable driving experience that was anything but seamless. These fundamental operational flaws transformed a crucial drivetrain component into a constant source of anxiety and expense.
The Sentra’s woes, unfortunately, extended beyond just its transmission. Owners also contended with the alarming possibility of “engine stalling,” a critical safety concern that could manifest unexpectedly and leave drivers in precarious situations. Compounding these mechanical shortcomings, the 2013-2019 Sentra also accumulated a substantial record of recalls. These vital safety advisories covered a “laundry list of issues” impacting “airbags, seatbelts, brakes, and more.” Such widespread and critical recalls suggest a deeper pattern of manufacturing and design flaws, undermining confidence in the vehicle’s fundamental integrity and reliability.
Collectively, these persistent mechanical failures and critical safety recalls created an ownership experience fraught with worry and frequent trips to the service center. What was intended to be an economical and reliable compact sedan instead became a symbol of compromise and ongoing frustration. For those who purchased a Nissan Sentra from these specific model years, the dream of affordable, trouble-free motoring quickly evaporated, replaced by the grim reality of a car that demanded more attention, more repairs, and ultimately, more regret than any owner should ever have to bear.
Car Model Information: 2023 Nissan Sentra SV
Name: Nissan Sentra
Caption: 2021 Nissan Sentra SR (B18; Canada)
Manufacturer: Nissan
Aka: Nissan Sunny
Production: 1982–present
Class: Subcompact car
Predecessor: Nissan Sunny#B310
Categories: 1990s cars, 2000s cars, 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All Wikipedia articles written in American English
Summary: The Nissan Sentra is a series of automobiles manufactured by the Japanese automaker Nissan since 1982. Since 1999, the Sentra has been categorized as a compact car, while previously it occupied the subcompact class. Until 2006, Sentra was a rebadged export version of the Japanese Nissan Sunny, but since the 2013 model year, Sentra is a rebadged export version of the Sylphy. The Sentra nameplate is not used in Japan. Many other countries in Latin America sell their versions of the Sunny as the Sentra. In Mexico, the first three generations of the Sentra were known as the Nissan Tsuru (Japanese for crane), and the B13 model was sold under that name until 2017, alongside the updated models badged as Sentra.
In North America, the Sentra currently serves as Nissan’s compact car, despite being rated as a mid-size car by the EPA due to its interior volume since the 2007 model year. While previous Sentras were subcompacts, the Sentra has grown over the years, with the Nissan Versa having replaced the Sentra in the entry-level area.
The Sentra name was created for Nissan by Ira Bachrach of NameLab, and Bachrach describes the origin as “Nissan wanted consumers to understand that it was quite safe even though it was small. The word Sentra sounds like central as well as sentry, which evokes images of safety.”
Get more information about: Nissan Sentra
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Nissan Model: Sentra
Price: $19,490 Mileage: 41,832 mi.
3. **Chrysler 200: A Sedan Defined by Its Reliability Lapses**The Chrysler 200, a sedan produced from 2011 to 2017, was envisioned as a contender in the fiercely competitive mid-size segment, aiming to blend American styling with everyday practicality. However, its tenure on the market was ultimately characterized by a recurring theme of reliability issues that significantly dampened its appeal and left a lasting impression of disappointment among its owners. From its earliest iterations, the 200 struggled to consistently deliver the dependable performance and peace of mind that buyers rightfully expect from a family sedan.
A significant portion of the Chrysler 200’s reliability woes can be attributed directly to its transmission, particularly the 9-speed automatic transmission found in the 2015, 2016, and 2017 models. This sophisticated unit, intended to enhance efficiency and driving dynamics, proved instead to be “especially problematic.” Owners frequently reported a range of issues, from erratic shifting and delayed gear engagement to, most critically, outright “transmission failure.” Such a severe flaw in a major mechanical component represents not just an inconvenience but a substantial financial burden, often requiring costly and extensive repairs that could easily outweigh the vehicle’s depreciated value.
Beyond the glaring transmission problems, the Chrysler 200 also suffered from “engine performance problems,” further contributing to a driving experience that often fell short of expectations. These engine-related concerns, combined with the prevalent transmission difficulties, painted a picture of a vehicle that simply wasn’t robustly engineered for long-term reliability. For owners, these issues translated into unexpected breakdowns, frequent visits to the dealership service bay, and a constant undercurrent of doubt about their vehicle’s dependability, eroding any initial satisfaction they might have felt.
In retrospect, the Chrysler 200 became a poignant example of how a vehicle’s potential can be overshadowed by fundamental mechanical weaknesses. Despite its attempts at modern styling and interior amenities, the persistent and costly reliability issues, especially concerning its critical powertrain components, ultimately defined its legacy. For those who invested in a Chrysler 200 during its production run, the experience was often one of buyer’s remorse, a stark reminder that beneath the sheet metal, a car must first and foremost deliver on its promise of reliable, trouble-free operation.
Having dissected the initial wave of sedans that left owners lamenting their purchase, our journey into buyer’s remorse continues. The automotive landscape is unforgiving, and even vehicles with a strong brand legacy or pioneering technology can falter when it comes to long-term ownership satisfaction. As we delve deeper, we uncover more tales of unmet expectations, engineering missteps, and design choices that ultimately led drivers to wish they could simply wipe these models from their automotive history.
Car Model Information: 2014 Chrysler 200 Touring
Name: Chrysler 200
Manufacturer: Chrysler
Production: 2010–2016
ModelYears: 2011–2017
Assembly: Sterling Heights, Michigan
Class: Mid-size car
Sp: us
Predecessor: Chrysler Sebring
Categories: 2010s cars, All articles with dead external links, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles with dead external links from July 2020, Articles with permanently dead external links
Summary: The Chrysler 200 is a mid-size sedan that was manufactured and marketed by Chrysler from model years 2011 to 2017 across two generations in four-door sedan and two-door convertible (first generation only) body styles.
The 200 nameplate debuted on the 200C, a prototype hybrid vehicle shown at the 2009 North American International Auto Show in Detroit and based on the Chrysler 300. The 200C concept was engineered to accept either traditional gasoline, hybrid or full-electric powertrains.
Get more information about: Chrysler 200
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Chrysler Model: 200
Price: $4,999 Mileage: 116,056 mi.
4. **Nissan Altima: The Unreliable CVT Strikes Again**The Nissan Altima has historically carved out a significant niche in the highly competitive mid-size sedan segment, often appealing to buyers seeking a practical, comfortable, and relatively affordable family vehicle. However, like many of its Nissan brethren, specific generations of the Altima have unfortunately become synonymous with profound reliability issues, casting a long shadow over its otherwise appealing characteristics. For a significant cohort of owners, the Altima transformed from a dependable daily driver into a constant source of frustration and unexpected expense, making it a prime candidate for the ‘erase’ list.
The primary culprit behind much of the Altima’s owner dissatisfaction, particularly for model years spanning from 2013 to 2019, was, predictably, its Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT). This transmission, a staple in many Nissan models, was designed to enhance both fuel efficiency and powertrain smoothness. Instead, for the Altima, it frequently manifested as a deeply problematic component. Owners reported a range of issues, from noticeable hesitations and a disquieting lack of responsiveness under acceleration to jarring shudders and, in many severe cases, outright premature transmission failure, often requiring costly replacement.
Beyond the well-documented CVT woes, the Altima also presented owners with a series of other, equally frustrating mechanical concerns that chipped away at its perceived value and reliability. Steering system issues were not uncommon, contributing to a less precise and confidence-inspiring driving experience than one might expect from a modern sedan. Furthermore, a persistent and concerning problem involved excessive oil consumption and oil leaks, which not only added to running costs but also signaled deeper engine integrity problems, often requiring frequent monitoring and expensive repairs.
These cumulative issues painted a stark picture of a vehicle that, despite its initial promise, struggled to deliver on the fundamental expectation of reliable, hassle-free transport. The consistent mechanical failings, particularly those affecting the critical powertrain and lubrication systems, eroded owner trust and transformed what should have been a straightforward ownership experience into a series of headaches and financial burdens. For many Altima owners during these contentious years, the car became a regrettable financial decision, a constant reminder of an automotive purchase they would unequivocally reverse given the opportunity.
Read more about: Regret in Every Lane: 12 Rides Drivers Admit They’d “Unbuy” in a Flash, Ranked by Real-World Woes
/Tesla%20Inc%20tesla%20by-%20Iv-olga%20via%20Shutterstock.jpg)
5. **Tesla Model 3 (Early Adopters): The Cutting Edge with Rough Edges**When the Tesla Model 3 first burst onto the scene, it was heralded as the electric vehicle for the masses, promising to revolutionize personal transportation with its blend of cutting-edge technology, exhilarating performance, and a compelling vision for the future. Enthusiasts and environmentally conscious drivers alike flocked to pre-order, eager to be among the first to experience this paradigm shift. However, as is often the case with groundbreaking technology, those pioneering early adopters found themselves navigating a landscape riddled with unforeseen challenges, transforming the dream of an electric savior into a sometimes frustrating, often disappointing, reality.
The core of the early Model 3’s struggles wasn’t its fundamental electric powertrain or its revolutionary infotainment system, but rather the execution of its basic manufacturing. Early production units were plagued by a litany of quality control issues that simply didn’t align with the premium positioning or price tag of the vehicle. Complaints frequently surfaced regarding paint problems, with uneven application and easily chipped finishes marring the exterior aesthetic. Equally concerning were the numerous reports of misaligned body panels, indicating a lack of precision in the assembly process that undermined the vehicle’s structural integrity and visual appeal.
Furthermore, the initial interior experience of the Model 3, while minimalist and forward-thinking, was often perceived as decidedly lackluster, especially by those accustomed to the material quality and ergonomic refinement of traditional luxury sedans. The sparse cabin, combined with questionable material choices in some areas, left many early buyers feeling that the interior didn’t quite match the revolutionary hype of the exterior and powertrain. This perceived disconnect between expectation and tangible quality contributed significantly to a sense of disillusionment among early adopters.
Adding to these tangible build quality concerns, early Model 3 ownership was also characterized by its share of software glitches. While Tesla is renowned for over-the-air updates, the initial iterations of the software were not always seamless, leading to various operational quirks and system malfunctions that could detract from the driving experience. Coupled with the inherent anxieties surrounding electric vehicle charging infrastructure and range — commonly known as ‘range anxiety’ — these factors collectively created an ownership experience that fell short of the utopian vision.
For these early adopters, the Model 3 became a symbol of both cool technology and profound frustration. They were, in essence, the guinea pigs for a revolutionary product, enduring the growing pains of a new manufacturing process and a nascent technology. While the Model 3 has undoubtedly evolved and improved significantly over the years, those who bought into the initial promise often look back with regret, wishing they had waited for a more refined and thoroughly sorted product rather than being at the forefront of its imperfect launch.
Car Model Information: 2024 Toyota Camry SE
Name: Tesla Model 3
Manufacturer: Tesla, Inc.
Production: 2017–present
Assembly: unbulleted list
Designer: Franz von Holzhausen
Class: Mid-size car
BodyStyle: Sedan (car)
Layout: unbulleted list
Related: Tesla Model Y
Motor: unbulleted list
Transmission: Single-speed fixed (9:1 ratio)
Battery: unbulleted list
ElectricRange: unbulleted list
Charging: unbulleted list
Wheelbase: cvt
Length: unbulleted list
Width: cvt
Height: unbulleted list
Weight: cvt
Caption: 2019 Tesla Model 3 Performance
Categories: 2020s cars, ANCAP large family cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles in need of updating, All Wikipedia articles written in American English
Summary: The Tesla Model 3 is a battery electric powered mid-size sedan with a fastback body style built by Tesla, Inc., introduced in 2017. The vehicle is marketed as being more affordable to more people than previous models made by Tesla. The Model 3 was the world’s top-selling plug-in electric car for three years, from 2018 to 2020, before the Tesla Model Y, a crossover SUV based on the Model 3 chassis, took the top spot. In June 2021, the Model 3 became the first electric car to pass global sales of 1 million.
A facelifted Model 3 with revamped interior and exterior styling was introduced in late 2023 for countries supplied by Gigafactory Shanghai and in early 2024 in North America and other countries supplied by the Tesla Fremont Factory.
Get more information about: Tesla Model 3
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Tesla Model: Model 3
Price: $23,188 Mileage: 64,336 mi.
6. **Volkswagen Jetta (2019-Present): A Compromise Too Far**The Volkswagen Jetta has long held a cherished position in the hearts of many American drivers, celebrated for embodying a taste of solid German engineering, refined driving dynamics, and a hint of European sophistication in an accessible package. It was a go-to choice for those who desired a vehicle that felt a cut above its compact sedan rivals, blending practicality with a genuinely engaging driving experience. However, the Jetta’s current generation, specifically models from 2019 onward, has prompted a wave of disappointment, with many long-time enthusiasts and new buyers alike feeling that the car has lost its distinct identity, becoming a shadow of its former self.
A significant point of contention for owners of the newer Jetta is the noticeable downgrade in interior materials. Where previous generations often offered a commendable balance of durability and tactile quality, the 2019-present models have embraced cheaper, more pedestrian plastics and finishes. This shift away from Volkswagen’s characteristic cabin refinement creates an environment that feels less premium and more utilitarian, directly contradicting the brand’s heritage of delivering an elevated compact experience. For buyers who chose the Jetta for its perceived superior interior, this represented a clear step backward.
Beyond the tactile disappointments, the current Jetta’s driving dynamics have also become a source of considerable buyer’s remorse. The performance, once described as peppy and engaging, now often feels lackluster, with engine options that fail to inspire confidence or excitement. The suspension tuning, too, seems to have traded the Jetta’s historically composed and agile ride for a softer, less communicative setup. This combination results in a driving experience that struggles to live up to the “sportier European roots” that once defined the Jetta, leaving drivers with a sense of blandness rather than spirited engagement.
Volkswagen’s strategic decision to reposition the Jetta as a more affordable, mass-market offering was an understandable business move aimed at expanding its appeal and market share. However, this pursuit of broader accessibility appears to have come at the cost of the very qualities that made the Jetta distinctive and desirable. The compromises made in interior quality, performance, and overall driving feel have inadvertently diluted the brand’s appeal among its loyal base and new buyers seeking a genuinely European-flavored compact sedan.
Ultimately, the 2019 and later Jetta models represent a turning point for the nameplate, one that many owners wish had taken a different path. The regret often stems from a feeling of having purchased a car that, while perfectly functional, lacks the character, quality, and driving enjoyment that was once synonymous with the Volkswagen badge. For these disillusioned buyers, the Jetta became a stark reminder that sometimes, chasing affordability can lead to an erosion of identity, leaving them to ponder whether they should have invested their hard-earned money in a vehicle that more closely matched their expectations of German engineering.
The automotive world is a dynamic tapestry of innovation, aspiration, and, inevitably, a few missteps. While the initial gleam of a new car often blinds us to potential pitfalls, the experiences of those who’ve walked the road before us offer invaluable lessons. The six sedans we’ve scrutinized in this in-depth article—the Dodge Dart, Nissan Sentra, Chrysler 200, Nissan Altima, early Tesla Model 3, and the latest Volkswagen Jetta—serve as cautionary tales, each highlighting different facets of buyer’s remorse. From chronic mechanical failures to surprising quality control lapses and deliberate design compromises, these vehicles demonstrate that even well-known nameplates can occasionally fall short of expectations. For any discerning buyer, the takeaway is clear: look beyond the marketing hype, delve into objective critiques, and prioritize long-term reliability and genuine owner satisfaction. After all, the best way to avoid a regrettable purchase is to learn from the vehicles buyers would gladly ‘erase’ from memory.
