Texas has recently been the scene of two separate and tragic fatal dog attacks, prompting intense investigations and raising significant community concerns. One incident in Bacliff, Galveston County, saw a man killed by his own pit bull dogs, necessitating a deputy’s intervention. Separately, in Houston, a neighbor was fatally mauled by three Staffordshire mixes, leading to the arrest and multiple charges against their owner, who also faces a prior murder accusation.
These incidents underscore the severe dangers posed by unrestrained or aggressive animals and the critical importance of responsible pet ownership. Law enforcement agencies in both Galveston County and Houston have initiated thorough investigations, processing evidence and gathering witness statements to understand the full scope of these devastating events and ensure accountability. The communities affected are grappling with the shock and grief resulting from these unexpected fatalities.
The investigations are currently active, with authorities compiling facts and preparing for legal proceedings where applicable. The following details provide a comprehensive look into the initial reports, the tragic circumstances surrounding the victims’ deaths, and the immediate actions taken by law enforcement in the wake of these two distinct but equally harrowing events.
1. **The Bacliff Attack: Initial Report and Victim Death**On October 12, 2025, Galveston County Sheriff’s deputies responded to a distress call reporting a dog attack in the 400 block of Louisiana Avenue in Bacliff, Texas. Preliminary investigation indicated that the victim, later identified as 45-year-old Jesus Castillo, was attacked by his two pit bull dogs within his own yard. The situation was critical upon the deputies’ arrival.
Witnesses reported observing both dogs, which belonged to the victim, actively attacking him. The scene was described as extremely violent, highlighting the sudden and severe nature of the assault. Such incidents often develop with little warning, escalating rapidly from seemingly normal interactions to life-threatening emergencies, as was tragically the case here.
Castillo was severely injured during the attack. The deputies’ prompt response was crucial in addressing the immediate threat, though the severity of the victim’s injuries already indicated a grave outcome. The initial reports from the scene painted a grim picture of the escalating violence.
2. **Deputy’s Intervention in Bacliff**Upon arriving at the scene, deputies encountered one of the dogs still latched onto the victim’s arm, continuing the attack. Recognizing the immediate and ongoing threat to Jesus Castillo’s life, a deputy took decisive action. The deputy discharged a firearm, striking the dog in the center in an effort to stop the assault and protect the victim.
Following the gunshot, the dog released Castillo and retreated to a corner of the yard, ceasing its attack. This intervention was deemed necessary by law enforcement under the extreme circumstances. The Galveston County Sheriff’s Office later issued a statement regarding the difficult decision, emphasizing the deputies’ reluctance to harm an animal.
In a press release on Sunday, the Galveston County Sheriff’s Office stated: “Deputies never want to harm an animal, but in this case, immediate action was necessary in attempt to protect the victim’s life.” This statement highlighted the gravity of the situation and the immediate danger faced by Castillo, justifying the use of force to prevent further harm.
3. **Witness Account: Jesus Excontitta’s Attempt to Help**Jesus Excontitta, a neighbor of the victim, described hearing desperate cries for help originating from Castillo’s yard. Excontitta recounted the harrowing sounds, stating, “I heard him screaming, screaming, screaming, pleading, crying. I can still hear his voice.” These initial screams prompted Excontitta to investigate the disturbance.
Upon running outside, Excontitta discovered Castillo being attacked by both of his pit bulls. Excontitta described the scene vividly, noting, “The dog got him by the arm, and he’s crying for help, pleading for help.” This direct observation spurred the neighbor to attempt an intervention, despite the inherent danger.
Excontitta described jumping into action, retrieving a butcher knife to try and fight off one of the dogs. “One swing and boom,” Excontitta stated, describing hitting one dog across the face, which caused it to stop completely. When this tactic proved ineffective against the second dog, Excontitta ran back to get another knife and began stabbing the animal, but it still refused to release its grip on Castillo. Ultimately, Excontitta spotted a police officer and ran to wave them down for assistance.
4. **Victim Identification and Tragic Outcome: Jesus Castillo**The victim of the Bacliff dog attack was identified as 45-year-old Jesus Castillo. Following the deputy’s intervention, Castillo was transported to HCA Clear Lake hospital. CPR was in progress during the transport, indicating the severe nature of his injuries and the immediate medical efforts to save his life. Despite these efforts, Castillo was later confirmed deceased from the injuries sustained in the attack.
His neighbor, Jesus Excontitta, expressed profound shock and sadness over Castillo’s death. Excontitta noted the personal connection, stating, “That’s somebody we see every day. You don’t expect this to happen to, you know, somebody real close to you.” The sudden loss of a familiar face in the community left a lasting impact on those who knew him.
Excontitta also conveyed surprise regarding the attack, remarking that he believed Castillo took good care of his dogs. The unexpected nature of the incident compounded the tragedy for the community. “It’s just a horrible experience,” Excontitta reflected, expressing the difficulty of coming to terms with the fact that his last conversation with Castillo would indeed be their final one.
5. **Animal Control’s Role and Euthanization in Bacliff**Following the tragic incident in Bacliff, Galveston County Animal Control personnel were dispatched to the scene. Their role was critical in securing the animals involved in the fatal attack. Animal Control responded promptly and took custody of both pit bull dogs that had attacked Jesus Castillo.
The disposition of the animals was decided quickly due to the severity of the incident. Both dogs were euthanized by animal control on Monday, the day following the attack. This action is a standard procedure in cases where animals are involved in fatal attacks, especially when public safety is a primary concern and the animals have demonstrated extreme aggression.
Euthanization ensures that the animals cannot pose a threat to anyone else in the future. The process marks the final official action concerning the animals themselves, concluding their direct involvement in the tragic events that led to Castillo’s death. The investigation, however, continues to gather all relevant facts surrounding the incident.
6. **The Houston Attack: Harriette Phillips’ Fatal Mauling**A separate and equally devastating dog attack occurred in Houston, Texas, on March 23, 2025. This incident involved 65-year-old Harriette Phillips, who was fatally mauled by three Staffordshire mixes belonging to her neighbor, Marshall Garrett. The attack unfolded in Phillips’ backyard, highlighting a failure in animal containment.
According to court records, the dogs “appeared that the defendant’s dogs had broken through her fence” and entered Phillips’ property. The breach of the shared fence allowed the aggressive animals to access the victim’s yard without warning, leading to the tragic confrontation. This detail is central to the criminal charges filed against the dogs’ owner.
The mauling was severe, resulting in Phillips’ death from her injuries. The incident quickly escalated, emphasizing the sudden and overwhelming nature of such attacks when aggressive animals gain access to vulnerable individuals. The Houston Police Department initiated an investigation immediately following the report of the fatal attack.
7. **Marshall Garrett’s Arrest and Initial Charges**Following the fatal attack on Harriette Phillips, Marshall Garrett, the 38-year-old owner of the three Staffordshire mixes, was arrested. The arrest occurred on Tuesday, subsequent to the March 23 incident. This legal action signified the beginning of criminal proceedings against him in connection with his dogs’ actions.
Court documents filed on April 9 detailed the specific charges against Garrett. He was charged with three counts of criminal negligent failure to secure his dogs. These charges directly relate to the alleged negligence in maintaining control over his animals, which ultimately led to his neighbor’s death.
Detectives learned that Garrett did not directly witness the attacks. However, court documents stated that he “realized what occurred afterward and called 911.” This indicates his awareness of the tragic outcome once the attack had concluded, prompting him to contact emergency services. His arrest and subsequent charges underscore the legal consequences of failing to adequately secure potentially dangerous animals.
8. **Prior Warnings of Aggressive Behavior**Marshall Garrett’s dogs, described in court documents as “aggressive,” had a documented history of problematic behavior prior to the fatal attack on Harriette Phillips. Detectives learned from neighbors that these dogs had repeatedly exhibited a pattern of digging holes, breaking through fences, and clawing their way into adjacent properties, posing an ongoing nuisance and threat.
These incidents were not isolated, suggesting a persistent issue with the dogs’ containment and temperament. One neighbor specifically recounted an incident where one of Garrett’s dogs nipped her finger while she was attempting to repair a hole in her fence. This direct interaction provided clear evidence of the dogs’ aggressive tendencies and their ability to inflict harm.
The accumulation of these reports underscores that the dogs’ aggressive nature and propensity to escape were known within the community. Such consistent patterns of behavior typically warrant more stringent containment measures and responsible ownership practices, highlighting a significant lapse in preventing future incidents.
Read more about: Beyond the Launchpad: An Analytical Look at The Challenger Disaster’s Technical Flaws from Faulty O-Rings to Explosive Failure
9. **Negligence and Warning Texts**On the very day of the fatal attack, Marshall Garrett received explicit communication regarding his dogs’ presence in Harriette Phillips’ yard. A neighbor, observing the dogs had once again breached containment, sent Garrett a text message to inform him of the situation, according to court records obtained by police.
In the text exchange, the neighbor specifically warned Garrett that his dogs “are starting to go to our neighbor’s backyard and now, they are digging holes on my side of the fence.” This message served as a direct and undeniable notification of the immediate danger the dogs posed and their unsecured status.
Garrett’s response to this critical warning was recorded in the text messages as: “Oh lord, I’m about to get it resolved.” This reply indicates his awareness of the problem and an acknowledgement of the need for immediate action, yet it failed to prevent the tragedy that subsequently unfolded in Phillips’ yard.
Read more about: Beyond the Bump: 15 Critical Legal Steps to Take After a Minor Car Accident
10. **Surveillance Footage Details**Police investigators were able to access and review critical evidence from Harriette Phillips’ home security cameras, which captured the harrowing events of the attack. This footage provided a visual account of the moments leading up to and during the fatal mauling, offering crucial insights into the incident’s progression.
The surveillance video showed Phillips in her backyard, “scanning her backyard looking for something” and striking her fence with a hammer. It appeared she was actively assessing or attempting to reinforce the boundary where Garrett’s dogs had reportedly broken through, suggesting she was aware of a potential vulnerability.
Tragically, the footage then captured the instant the aggressive dogs “returned through the broken fence and attacked her.” Phillips was seen screaming for help and attempting to defend herself using the hammer she carried, illustrating her desperate struggle against the overwhelming assault.
Read more about: Google’s Graveyard & Gripes: 12 Times Even the Tech Giant Tripped Up (and Why We’re Still Here)
11. **The Severity of the Attack Captured**The details gleaned from the surveillance footage and subsequently documented in court records painted a grim picture of the severity of the dog attack. As Phillips attempted to defend herself, she ultimately fell to the ground, leaving her vulnerable to the aggressive animals.
The court records stated that the dogs began “mauling her head, neck area, arms/elbows and other parts of her body.” This description highlights the extensive and brutal nature of the injuries inflicted, indicating a sustained and vicious assault by the three Staffordshire mixes.
The attack continued relentlessly, as captured by the cameras, “until the complainant was unable to move anymore or screamed for help.” This detail underscores the overwhelming force of the attack and the tragic outcome, with Phillips succumbing to her injuries at the scene.
Read more about: 15 Essential Guidelines for Safe Road Sharing with Autonomous Vehicles in California
12. **Marshall Garrett’s Criminal Past: The Murder Charge Foundation**Marshall Garrett’s legal troubles extend beyond the charges related to his dogs’ fatal attack. Court documents revealed that Garrett possessed an established criminal record prior to the March 23 incident, notably involving a prior murder charge that placed him already within the criminal justice system.
Last year, Garrett, alongside a female suspect identified as Latrecia Washington, was charged with murder. This serious accusation stemmed from an incident where they allegedly assaulted a man, leading to his death. This background provides a critical context to Garrett’s character and his legal entanglements.
At the time of the fatal dog attack on Harriette Phillips, Garrett had been arrested for this earlier murder charge and was subsequently released on bond. This detail is significant, indicating that he was out of custody while awaiting trial for a separate, severe felony when his dogs caused another tragic fatality.
13. **Details of the Prior Murder Incident**The murder charge against Marshall Garrett dates back to an incident on October 29, 2024. Court records detail that Garrett was involved in the fatal assault of 69-year-old Alton Martin outside a Family Dollar store in Houston. The altercation reportedly originated from a dispute concerning the authenticity of jewelry Martin had sold to Washington.
According to court records, the confrontation escalated when Garrett approached Martin from behind and punched him in the back of the head. This initial act of violence set off a chain of events that tragically culminated in Martin’s death. Martin’s fiancée reported Washington chasing Martin and holding a knife to his throat before the assault.
Martin sustained severe injuries from the alleged assault, which included Garrett and Washington reportedly beating him with either a knife handle or a metal pipe. Tragically, Martin died from blunt-force trauma to his head approximately 12 days after the attack, leading to the murder charges against Garrett and Washington.
Read more about: When the Spotlight Fades: 13 Athletes Whose Lucrative Endorsement Deals Crashed and Burned
14. **Legal Standing and Bond for Marshall Garrett**Following his initial arrest for the murder charge in October 2024, Marshall Garrett had been released on bond, allowing him to be out of police custody. However, his freedom was short-lived after the fatal dog attack on Harriette Phillips in March 2025.
Garrett was re-arrested on Tuesday, April 9, in connection with the three counts of criminal negligent failure to secure his dogs. This marked his return to police custody for the new charges directly related to the death of his neighbor, demonstrating the immediate legal consequences of his alleged negligence.
During a subsequent court appearance, bond was set at $250,000 for the previously filed murder charge, indicating the serious nature of his ongoing legal battles. As of Tuesday, Garrett remains in police custody, facing multiple felony charges that could result in substantial penalties.
Read more about: The Enigmatic Exit: Unraveling the True Reasons Why Joe Pesci Became Hollywood’s Most Fascinating Recluse
15. **Fate of the Houston Dogs and Broader Implications**Following the fatal mauling of Harriette Phillips, all three Staffordshire mixes belonging to Marshall Garrett were taken into custody. Court records confirmed that these dogs were euthanized after the attack, a decisive action taken by animal control authorities to ensure public safety and prevent any further incidents of aggression.
The euthanization of animals involved in fatal attacks is a standard, albeit difficult, procedure in such grave circumstances. It serves as a final measure to remove a demonstrated threat from the community, concluding the animals’ direct involvement in the tragic events that led to Phillips’ death.
The incidents in both Bacliff and Houston collectively serve as stark reminders of the profound responsibilities inherent in pet ownership, particularly when dealing with large or powerful breeds. They underscore the critical importance of secure containment, vigilant supervision, and proactive intervention when animals display aggressive tendencies.
These tragedies resonate beyond the immediate victims and their families, highlighting wider implications for community safety and the efficacy of animal control regulations. The events prompt ongoing discussions among law enforcement, animal welfare organizations, and local residents about how to prevent similar devastating occurrences and reinforce the paramount need for responsible pet ownership to safeguard human lives.
