Greetings, fellow developers and gamers! Have you ever been dragged into a compulsory covert project that doesn’t fit in while you were absorbed in the fast-paced action of your favorite game? You’re not alone, however. It’s time to confront the hidden issue: the apparently out-of-date practice of obligatory stealth missions in non-stealth games.

Let’s be honest, very few of us join up for an action-packed adventure only to end up cowering behind boxes, tiptoeing around, or tossing things to divert opposing forces. This is more than just a small irritation; it’s a pause in the game’s flow and frequently seems like an imposed departure from the aspects of the game that we truly appreciate. The boredom of traveling from cover to cover in the hopes of avoiding detection takes the place of the excitement of fighting enemies and leveling up. When will you be noticed? The annoyance of having to redo the entire part is something you should prepare for. In addition to being difficult, it is monotonous, repetitive, and, to be honest, a waste of our gaming time.
Consider Final Fantasy 7 Rebirth, with its chocobo handling objectives, or the Insomniac Spider-Man games, where you’re suddenly in Mary Jane’s shoes. These parts of the game feel less like fun and more like a duty. Adding variation to gameplay is one thing, but pressuring players to adopt gameplay patterns that conflict with the game’s main mechanics—especially when those systems are clumsy or seem like an afterthought—is quite another. Stealth games have their audience, thus the problem isn’t with stealth gaming in general. When these missions are forced into genres where they have no place, it throws off the flow and takes away from the main gaming experience.
Forcefully interrupting the flow of fighting
For the action, many of us prefer action games. We anticipate the excitement of fighting, the strategy of taking on powerful opponents, and the joy of navigating through a well crafted gaming setting. It’s like being penalized for attempting to play the game the way it was presented to us when a stealth mission arises out of nowhere. Furthermore, the mechanics utilized in these stealth segments are typically extremely different from those in the rest of the game, demanding a sudden shift in playstyle and approach. If the mechanics were well-thought-out and easily integrated, this wouldn’t be as terrible. But all too often, they appear like afterthoughts—basic, brutish, and lacking of the depth exhibited in specialist stealth games.
It’s not just about the discomfort of switching playstyles in the midst of a game; it’s also about the stunning mismatch between what we anticipated from the game and what we had to put up with. When the game typically succeeds in offering an intriguing and exciting experience, this disconnect may be incredibly disheartening. It’s like ordering a great dining experience only to have an undercooked meal plopped in the center. That one dish may leave a horrible taste in your mouth, regardless of how amazing the rest of the dinner is.
We realize that variety is crucial and that integrating numerous gameplay components may enrich a game, dear designers. Please, however, let’s retain such components compatible with the core concept and gameplay of the game. When correctly done and incorporated into the game’s setting, stealth missions may be a terrific addition. However, it’s time to rethink their inclusion if they are forced, inadequately done, and interfere with the gaming experience. Instead of taking away from each game with needless gameplay components, let’s focus on boosting what makes it distinctive and fun. Because giving your players with the finest experience possible is ultimately what counts, and sometimes less is more.
A Review Of Players’s Opinions
So, let’s take a closer look at what the gaming community has to say about this stealth mission fiasco and consider some new, creative ideas that could portend a better, less cunning future for our favorite games.
First, the gaming community has made no secret of its dislike for action-packed games that need forced stealth missions. These objectives, according to users like Temp89, are just attempts by developers to artificially prolong game time, abandoning the fun and tempo that first drew players in. The community as a whole has a strong desire for gameplay that adheres to a game’s essential concepts without superfluous, slow-moving extras.
Players are explicit about their preference for games that recognize and capitalize on their talents. For example, the Miles Morales Spider-Man game received accolades for its focus on action and avoidance of superfluous stealth elements. This alternative strategy demonstrates how games may provide exciting experiences without using inappropriate gameplay components.
However, we shouldn’t yet discard the good with the bad. As an interesting compromise, No_Doubt_About_That suggests rewarding effective stealth without severely penalizing detection, rather than punishing players for failing stealth parts with outright mission failures. This idea makes it possible to incorporate stealth features in a more rewarding but forgiving way.
HuevosSplash’s remarks about Dragon’s Dogma 2 and the actions of NPCs in stealth situations, which humorously highlight the frequently impractical and undeveloped nature of stealth systems, highlight the discrepancy between developer implementation and user expectations. It is obvious that if stealth is to be used, it must be done carefully and in a way that is consistent with the game’s setting.
Poor execution is the most frequently mentioned problem with mandated stealth operations. Many of these sequences seem to be from a bygone age of gaming, from bland escape strategies to guards that appear to have no peripheral vision. Feedback from the community highlights a need for stealth gameplay to be more inventive and subtle, if it must be present in non-stealth games.

It’s clear that stealth may be successfully implemented when it’s included carefully and with concern for the player’s experience when one considers classic instances of stealth missions from video games like Metroid and The Legend of Zelda series. Despite being difficult, some sections provided satisfying and distinctive gameplay changes that blended in perfectly with the overall story and gameplay design.
However, there appear to be innumerable poorly done stealth sections for every one that is done correctly, which causes annoyance and disappointment. Examples of stealth elements that seem more like a nuisance than a thrilling gameplay variant include the boring sneak-fests in the Harry Potter games while wearing the invisibility cloak, or the task in Grand Theft Pizza Delivery when Bob has to avoid his boss’s attention and his adulterous affair.
So what’s the next step? First, instead of making stealth a required checkpoint, creators may think about making it an optional gameplay feature. This would not penalize gamers who prefer a more direct approach, but would allow those who love the excitement of creeping about to do so. Furthermore, spending money on more complex and realistic AI might turn stealth parts into a more strategic and interesting experience rather than just a straightforward game of “cat and mouse.”
A revolution in stealth missions is long overdue. Developers may provide more seamless, entertaining gaming experiences by paying attention to player input, embracing innovation, and carefully incorporating stealth aspects in a way that enhances a game’s primary essence. After all, there is space for various types of play to flourish in the huge, always changing world of video games—as long as they are carried out with the enjoyment of the player in mind. Therefore, dear developers, let’s keep our action-packed adventures just that—action-packed—and make stealth missions a choice rather than a job.
Related posts:
Gaming News: The Stealth Mission Dilemma in Non-Stealth Games
Mandatory Stealth missions in games that aren’t actual stealth games and escort missions……
Has any non-stealth oriented game ever actually pulled off “forced stealth missions”?