From ‘Pretty in Pink’ to ‘First Blood’: 13 Iconic Films Radically Reshaped by Test Screenings

Movie & Music
From ‘Pretty in Pink’ to ‘First Blood’: 13 Iconic Films Radically Reshaped by Test Screenings
From ‘Pretty in Pink’ to ‘First Blood’: 13 Iconic Films Radically Reshaped by Test Screenings
Cinema Movie Free Stock Photo – Public Domain Pictures, Photo by publicdomainpictures.net, is licensed under CC Zero

In the unpredictable world of Hollywood filmmaking, where millions are spent and careers are forged or broken with every new release, there’s a secret weapon, or perhaps a lurking monster, that holds immense power over a film’s final form: the test screening. These pre-release viewings, where raw cuts of movies are shown to a select audience, can often be the ultimate Hollywood bugaboo, stirring up strong emotions from both creators and executives alike.

Directors frequently express disdain for them, often feeling that audience feedback interferes with their artistic visions, potentially derailing the very statement they hoped to convey. Producers, on the other hand, view them as a significant headache, knowing that negative reactions can necessitate costly and time-consuming re-edits. Yet, for movie fans, test screenings can swing either way, acting as both a bane and a boon.

While some test audiences have unfortunately reinforced executive meddling that ultimately led to the undoing of films, countless others have proven to be instrumental, not only enhancing the movies they previewed but actually shaping them into the massive hits and iconic features they became. It’s a fascinating peek behind the curtain, showcasing moments where, had directors stuck to their original guns, film history as we know it would be dramatically different. Imagine a world where Audrey II reigned supreme or Alex Forrest successfully framed Dan Gallagher for murder – thankfully, test audiences intervened. Let’s dive into some of the most compelling examples of films saved by crucial test audience reactions.

Pretty in Pink: A Different Prom Night for Andie
2023 – Post-Punk Music, Photo by postpunk.co.uk, is licensed under CC BY-ND 4.0

1. **Pretty in Pink: A Different Prom Night for Andie**The beloved 1980s teen romance “Pretty in Pink” holds a special place in the hearts of many, largely due to its iconic ending. However, this classic conclusion almost didn’t happen, and it’s all thanks to the very vocal disapproval of its initial test audiences. The original storyline had the ambitious high school senior, Andie Walsh, played by the incomparable Molly Ringwald, ultimately finding romance with her long-pining best friend, Duckie Dale, portrayed by Jon Cryer, during their prom.

This specific resolution, intended to wrap up the narrative, was met with an overwhelmingly negative response from viewers. The context explicitly states that test audiences “literally booed, rising to their feet in anger,” a reaction so powerful it sent director Howard Deutch into a tailspin. This kind of visceral audience feedback is rare, and it signaled an immediate need for significant changes to preserve the film’s appeal.

In response to this dramatic outcry, a swift overhaul was initiated. A quick five-page revision, penned by the legendary writer John Hughes, was drafted, followed by a one-day reshoot. This crucial intervention ensured that Andie ultimately chose Blane McDonnagh, the rich yet principled kid portrayed by Andrew McCarthy. Meanwhile, Duckie was given his own moment of connection, meeting a new girl who smiled at him at the dance, providing a more balanced and satisfying resolution for both characters.

The reshot ending, with Andie kissing Blane in the parking lot, effectively crossed class lines and allowed the ’80s-style Cinderella story to reach its emotional peak. This last-minute decision has been a subject of ongoing debate among audiences and even the actors themselves over the years. Yet, as the context reminds us, without this audience intervention, we wouldn’t have one of the most romantic kisses in ’80s movie history, making the dramatic pivot ultimately work out for the best.

2. **Little Shop of Horrors: A Feast for the Plant, Not the Audience**Frank Oz’s “Little Shop of Horrors” is a vibrant and darkly comedic musical, but its cinematic journey almost took a much grimmer path, one that worked far better on stage than it did on the silver screen. The original stage musical famously concludes with a stark warning, as Audrey (Ellen Greene), Seymour (Rick Moranis), and indeed all of New York City, succumb to the might of the carnivorous plant Audrey II and its insidious offspring. The final chilling message from Crystal (Tichina Arnold), Ronette (Michelle Weeks), and Chiffon (Tisha Campbell) is clear: “don’t feed the plants!”

When it came to the film adaptation, the creators initially shot an alternate ending that faithfully adhered to this dark, theatrical tradition. This ambitious sequence was a 23-minute spectacular tour de force, replete with intricate stop-motion effects that brought Audrey II’s victory to life. The technical achievement was undeniable, showcasing a grand scale of destruction and despair.

However, the revelation of these efforts to a test audience produced a reaction far from the intended mirth and laughter. Director Oz recounted the chilling reception to Entertainment Weekly, stating, “For every musical number, there was applause, they loved it, it was just fantastic… until Rick and Ellen died, and then the theatre became a refrigerator, an ice box.” The audience’s approval scores plummeted, peaking at a dismal thirteen percent, clearly indicating that the cinematic medium could not sustain the same level of nihilism as its stage counterpart.

This devastating feedback led to an urgent reshoot, completely altering the film’s tone and narrative trajectory. The new ending sees Seymour heroically electrocute Audrey II, escaping the urban jungle to find suburban bliss with Audrey. Even in their new tranquil life, a small Audrey II bud grows in the garden, a subtle nod to the plant’s enduring menace without sacrificing the happy ending audiences craved. This crucial pivot demonstrates how test screenings can prevent an artistic vision from alienating its broader audience.

3. **National Lampoon’s Vacation: The Griswolds Deserve Wally World**One might assume that in the zany, chaotic world of the “National Lampoon’s Vacation” series, audience intervention would play little role in the creative process. The franchise is known for its outlandish humor and often dark comedic turns. Yet, even a film as wild as “National Lampoon’s Vacation” found its original ending utterly rejected by test audiences, prompting a significant change that would become legendary.

The initial conclusion to the Griswolds’ cross-country odyssey saw patriarch Clark Griswold, played by Chevy Chase, taking Roy Walley (Eddie Bracken), the founder of Wally World, hostage with his trusty BB gun. Instead of the now-famous scene where Clark holds a security guard, played by John Candy, at gunpoint and enjoys a magical day in a completely empty park, the original version depicted Clark forcing Roy and his executive friends to dance at gunpoint for his twisted amusement.

Director Harold Ramis vividly recalled the audience’s reaction in a DVD commentary, as reported by Entertainment Weekly. He noted that “[The audience] went strangely quiet and did not laugh again for the rest of the picture.” Ramis’s realization was profound: after such an extensive buildup and the promise of the ultimate family destination, the audience felt just as miffed as the Griswolds were to be denied a visit to Wally World. They had invested emotionally in the family’s quest, and the dark, unfulfilling original ending betrayed that investment.

This insight led to the iconic, crowd-pleasing conclusion we know today, where Clark, though resorting to extreme measures, ensures his family finally experiences the joy of Wally World, albeit under unusual circumstances. It transformed a potentially alienating ending into one that resonated deeply with viewers, proving that even in broad comedy, audience expectations for satisfaction, particularly after a long journey, are paramount.

Patrick Dempsey” by Dave Hamster is licensed under CC BY 2.0

4. **Sweet Home Alabama: A Lightning Strike of Misjudgment**”Sweet Home Alabama” is a quintessential romantic comedy, charming audiences with its tale of a southern girl caught between her sophisticated New York life and her rustic Alabama roots. The film follows Melanie Smooter (Reese Witherspoon) as she navigates her complicated feelings for her estranged hometown ex-husband, Jake Perry (Josh Lucas), and her upper-crust fiancé, Andrew Hennings (Patrick Dempsey). The ultimate choice Melanie makes is a joyous one, settling on Jake, but this beloved conclusion was almost marred by an original ending that test audiences found appalling.

The initial cinematic resolution was far from the lighthearted and crowd-pleasing tone the rest of the film meticulously established. In this scrapped version, Melanie ventures to the beach to find Jake amidst a dramatic backdrop of lightning arcing across the sky. The narrative then takes an incredibly dark and jarring turn: the movie abruptly cuts to Jake carrying an unconscious Melanie into their wedding reception, where he shockingly announces her death via a lightning strike.

This morbid twist, however, was revealed to be a prank, as Melanie then rises from the “dead.” This “felony Melanie” ending, as it was internally dubbed, completely misjudged the audience’s sensibility. Test audiences did not find the dark humor in good taste and wasted no time in communicating their displeasure to the movie’s producers. The feedback was so decisive that it necessitated a complete reshoot of the ending.

The resulting, much more conventional and crowd-pleasing conclusion cemented Melanie’s choice of Jake in a manner befitting the romantic comedy genre. It underscored the importance of maintaining a consistent tone and understanding what kind of emotional payoff an audience expects from a film, especially one designed to be heartwarming and uplifting.

Akihabara : Cameron Diaz” by ivva is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

5. **My Best Friend’s Wedding: Julianne’s Lonely Fate**”My Best Friend’s Wedding” is a unique romantic comedy, primarily because its heroine, Julianne Potter (Julia Roberts), is, for much of the film, remarkably unlikable. She actively tries to sabotage the wedding of her best friend, Michael O’Neal (Dermot Mulroney), to the sweet and naive Kimmy Wallace (Cameron Diaz). This character dynamic led to a truly fascinating outcome during test screenings, where audiences expressed a profound desire for Julianne to end up alone.

In the film’s original ending, Julianne, despite her manipulative efforts throughout the movie, meets a new man, played by John Corbett, at Michael and Kimmy’s wedding reception. This resolution, intended to provide her with a measure of happiness, infuriated test audiences. Director PJ Hogan revealed to Entertainment Weekly that “They wanted her dead,” a testament to how strongly viewers reacted to Julianne’s actions. He added, “They just couldn’t understand her motives,” highlighting the audience’s inability to empathize with her character, let alone wish her a happy romantic outcome.

The studio, however, initially protested this data. Julia Roberts was the film’s main attraction, and the notion of her character ending up completely alone was considered verboten for a star of her caliber in a romantic comedy. Despite the audience’s fervent wishes, the filmmakers had to find a compromise that satisfied the studio’s need for a positive resolution for Roberts’ character while acknowledging the test audience’s clear aversion to her finding new love.

The solution was to expand Julianne’s friendship with George Downes, played by Rupert Everett. This provided a “happy out” that appealed to both those who disliked Julianne and those who hoped she would evolve into a much better friend in the future, without giving her an unearned romantic reward. It’s a compelling example of how test audiences can force a studio to reassess what constitutes a ‘happy ending’ for a protagonist, especially when that protagonist is far from conventional.

6. **Legally Blonde: The Iconic Graduation Speech**”Legally Blonde” culminates in such a perfectly crafted and inspiring way, with Elle Woods (Reese Witherspoon) delivering a memorable graduation speech, followed by on-screen text detailing the bright futures of the characters. It’s an ending so integral to the film’s identity that it’s nearly impossible to envision any other conclusion. Yet, this iconic moment was entirely the result of direct feedback from test audiences, who deemed the original ending lackluster and misaligned with Elle’s journey.

The movie initially wrapped up quite differently. Following the dramatic courthouse trial, Emmett Richmond (Luke Wilson) would kiss Elle on the courthouse steps, signifying their romantic triumph. The film would then flash-forward to Elle handing out fliers for her newly established Legally Blonde Defense Fund, accompanied by a newly blonde Vivian Kensington (Selma Blair). This ending, while offering a resolution, simply didn’t resonate with early viewers.

Test audiences immediately disliked this original conclusion. Co-writer Kirsten “Kiwi” Smith articulated the audience’s sentiment to Entertainment Weekly, stating, “They knew that this was not a movie about a girl getting a guy.” Viewers understood that the heart of “Legally Blonde” was Elle’s personal growth, her intellectual awakening, and her journey of self-discovery and empowerment, rather than merely securing a romantic partner. The original ending inadvertently centered the film too much on the romance, diminishing the impact of Elle’s individual achievements.

In response to this clear and unanimous feedback, a new ending was conceived promptly, reportedly in the theater lobby itself during the test screening. This led to the now-famous graduation sequence, which powerfully underscored Elle’s intelligence, resilience, and advocacy, providing a much stronger and more fitting conclusion to her transformative story. This swift and decisive change, driven by audience insight, undeniably helped birth a film classic and solidified its message of female empowerment.

7. **Scott Pilgrim vs the World: A Different Kind of Love Triangle Resolution**Edgar Wright’s “Scott Pilgrim vs the World” is a whirlwind of video game aesthetics and quirky romance, following Scott Pilgrim’s quest to defeat Ramona Flowers’ seven evil exes. However, the film’s initial conclusion presented a dramatically different romantic outcome, one that left test audiences sharply divided and ultimately led to a crucial rewrite, proving that even in a world of fantastical battles, a coherent love story reigns supreme.

The original ending saw Scott, after all his epic battles, ultimately ending up with Knives Chau, the high schooler he had been dating prior to Ramona. Director Edgar Wright had aimed for a bittersweet, open-ended feeling for this resolution, hoping it would evoke the reflective ambiguity of “The Graduate.” Yet, the response from test audiences was anything but unified; they were “divided into firm Ramona and Knives camps,” with a general consensus of dissatisfaction regarding how both female characters were treated in the narrative. This strong fan reaction signaled that the intended emotional payoff was missing.

In light of this passionate feedback, Wright went back to the drawing board, fundamentally reshaping the ending. The revised conclusion became an “open-ended celebration of the uncertainty of love.” It depicted Knives, having grown and matured throughout the film, pushing Scott and Ramona to reconcile. They then meet in a parking lot, embracing the unknown future as they “vow to ‘try again,’ getting one more go-round from the universe.” This rewrite not only addressed audience concerns but also solidified the film’s core theme of personal growth and second chances, allowing for a more resonant and widely accepted romantic conclusion.

8. **Fatal Attraction: Alex Forrest’s Unseen Cunning**”Fatal Attraction” delivered a chilling narrative that captivated audiences and instilled a profound fear of infidelity, culminating in a dramatic, violent confrontation. The iconic ending, where Alex Forrest is ultimately defeated by Dan Gallagher’s wife, Beth, after attempting to frame Dan for murder, is ingrained in cinematic history. Yet, this intense, satisfying resolution was born directly from test audience demands, starkly differing from a much darker, more psychologically intricate original vision.

The film’s initial ending was far more complex and arguably more chilling in its psychological implications. In this version, Alex meticulously “stages her own suicide, setting the scene to make Dan look like a murderer.” The police would then apprehend and “cart him away,” leaving only Beth aware of the truth, thanks to a revealing note left by Alex. This subtle, insidious conclusion offered a powerful commentary on manipulation and injustice, but it failed to satisfy the visceral desire for retribution that test audiences harbored.

Test audiences were overwhelmingly “firmly on Dan’s side and wanted Alex to die.” This strong reaction left little room for the ambiguous, tragic fate of the original script. Despite significant opposition from stars Anne Archer and Glenn Close, who both “fiercely opposed the new ending,” Michael Douglas supported the changes, and the more definitive, violent resolution was ultimately filmed. This pivotal shift, driven by audience preference, transformed “Fatal Attraction” into one of the “most iconic thrillers of the 1980s,” garnering six Academy Award nominations, even if it sacrificed a more nuanced, albeit less cathartic, original punch.

9. **Blade Runner: The Evolution of an Icon’s Ending**”Blade Runner” is a cinematic masterpiece renowned for its ambiguous narrative and multiple cuts, each offering a slightly different interpretation of its dystopian future. A significant contributor to these variations, particularly in the version initially seen by wider audiences, was the feedback gleaned from test screenings. These early viewings profoundly influenced how Rick Deckard’s story unfolded, especially concerning the fate of his relationship with the replicant, Rachel.

The changes initiated by test audiences were multi-faceted. They included “streamlining the narrative via Harrison Ford’s iconic but somewhat controversial and confusing voiceover” and implementing “several narrative cuts for clarity’s sake.” These adjustments were largely aimed at making the complex, philosophical sci-fi noir more accessible to a broader audience, who found the original cut too opaque or slow-paced. The most notable alteration, however, centered on the film’s conclusion, directly influencing its “happy ending” in the theatrical release.

In an earlier cut, Rick Deckard and Rachel’s journey together ended with them “enter[ing] an elevator as they head into an uncertain future where Rachel’s lifespan may be incredibly finite.” This ambiguous, potentially somber outlook was deemed unsatisfactory by test audiences. The theatrical cut replaced this with “Ford’s narration, in which Rick declares a more hopeful future for the couple, and a more open one,” suggesting a greater chance for their survival and happiness. While subsequent cuts, like the Director’s Cut and Final Cut, removed this narration and reinstated a more ambiguous ending, it’s undeniable that test audiences played a critical role in shaping the initial, more optimistic version that defined “Blade Runner” for many early viewers.

Thor: The Dark World: Loki's Undying Trickery
18 Thor Facts You Should Know – Facts.net, Photo by facts.net, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

10. **Thor: The Dark World: Loki’s Undying Trickery**Marvel Studios’ “Thor: The Dark World” stands as a pivotal installment in the sprawling MCU, but its original narrative trajectory for key characters, particularly Loki, was dramatically different. Test audiences, in their infinite wisdom, weren’t buying into the film’s initial plan, leading to significant reshoots that ensured the Trickster God’s continued presence and cemented his enduring popularity, forever altering the fabric of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

The film’s initial conclusion was quite definitive: it saw Thor ascending to the throne of Asgard, a path his father Odin supported, realizing Thor’s love for Jane Foster was a strength, not a weakness. Crucially, in this scrapped version, “his brother, Loki, perishes.” Furthermore, Jane Foster and Thor were set to break up, allowing them to pursue their individual goals. This somber, conclusive ending for Loki, intended to be a genuine sacrifice, simply didn’t resonate with early viewers, who had grown fond of Tom Hiddleston’s captivating portrayal.

The audience’s disbelief and unwillingness to accept Loki’s demise necessitated swift and extensive reshoots. These changes were engineered to keep “the trickster god in play via subterfuge.” The original, darker plot was completely inverted, and the narrative was revised to reveal that Loki hadn’t truly died but had instead “shapeshifted into Odin,” cunningly taking over the throne. This critical pivot, born from test audience feedback, injected a layer of intrigue and complexity into the Asgardian storyline, ensuring Loki’s survival and setting the stage for his future iconic appearances throughout the MCU, ultimately building the universe up in fascinating and unexpected ways.

Anchorman: Ron Burgundy's Legendary Transformation
File:The Cast Anchorman 2013.jpg – Wikimedia Commons, Photo by wikimedia.org, is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

11. **Anchorman: Ron Burgundy’s Legendary Transformation**”Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy” has become a comedy classic, filled with endlessly quotable lines and unforgettable characters. Yet, the film we know and love today was not the one initially conceived. It was a movie “completely reshaped by test screenings,” where early audiences reacted so poorly to the original cut that it necessitated a drastic overhaul, fundamentally altering the narrative and ensuring Ron Burgundy’s place in comedic legend.

The initial version of “Anchorman” concluded with a bizarre and controversial storyline. Veronica Corningstone, Ron’s rival and eventual love interest, was “kidnapped Patty Hearst-style,” leading her news team colleagues on a mission to rescue her. This unexpected, dark, and politically charged twist did not sit well with preview audiences. As Will Ferrell himself explained on Christina Applegate’s podcast, “Messy,” “We just lost the audience,” particularly when the focus veered away from the beloved news team’s interactions. The negative feedback, which saw the film score a dismal “50 out of 100” from its first audiences, was a clear signal that the creative team had strayed too far from what viewers expected.

In response to this significant rejection, DreamWorks provided a “generous stipend to re-film the ending and the offending scenes.” This led to the now-iconic finale, where Burgundy heroically “sav[es] Corningstone from a group of angry pandas.” The film then uses a “flash-forward that explains where the KVWN Channel 4 news team ends up,” solidifying their fates in a much more satisfying and comedic manner. These reshoots, directly influenced by audience dissatisfaction, were crucial in birthing the beloved movie, proving that sometimes, even in outrageous comedy, audience expectations for a coherent and entertaining narrative are paramount.


Read more about: 12 Unforgettable Times Will Ferrell’s Hilarious Genius Had The Cast Breaking On Set (And Us Too!)

12. **Army of Darkness: Hail to the Audience, Baby!**”Army of Darkness,” the cult classic conclusion to Sam Raimi’s Evil Dead trilogy, is celebrated for its unique blend of horror, comedy, and sword-and-sorcery. What many fans might not realize, however, is that the film exists in two distinct versions, a testament to the powerful influence of test audiences. Their strong disapproval of the original ending led to the creation of a more triumphant, crowd-pleasing conclusion that gave us some of Ash Williams’ most legendary catchphrases.

The initial ending for Ash Williams was decidedly grim and, in true Evil Dead fashion, darkly comedic. It depicted Ash taking “too many drops of ‘the juice’ the Wiseman boils up,” a potent sedative intended to send him back to his own time. This miscalculation resulted in him “sleeping for much longer than intended, waking up alone in a post-apocalyptic London and promptly going mad.” This profoundly downbeat and isolating conclusion, while perhaps fitting for the franchise’s dark humor, was met with strong “annoyance” from test audiences, and indeed, from Raimi and star Bruce Campbell themselves.

At the insistence of Universal Studios, a new, more commercially viable ending was quickly filmed. This revised conclusion sees Ash waking up at the proper time, returning to his mundane job at S-Mart, only to realize he “didn’t say the words properly and a Deadite has followed him home.” He swiftly dispatches the demon, gets the girl, and delivers some of his most memorable lines, including “Hail to the king, baby.” This more heroic and satisfying resolution directly stemmed from audience feedback. Interestingly, “UK audiences received the original ending,” along with additional scenes, but it was the test audience-driven American cut that propelled phrases like “Hail to the king, baby” into the public lexicon, shaping the film’s enduring legacy.

Rambo First Blood” by keepitsurreal is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

13. **First Blood: Keeping Rambo Alive, Against All Odds**”First Blood,” the inaugural film in the iconic Rambo franchise, introduced audiences to John Rambo, a tormented Vietnam War veteran whose battle against a small-town sheriff escalated into a gripping fight for survival. While the film is celebrated for its intense action and psychological depth, it almost concluded with a stark, uncompromising ending that would have fundamentally altered the character’s legacy. It was the crucial intervention of test audiences that ultimately “kept John Rambo alive.”

The original climax of “First Blood” was a far more bleak and definitive conclusion for its protagonist. In this version, John Rambo, driven to the brink by the relentless persecution and trauma he endured, would have died. The initial script had him succumbing to his wounds or taking his own life, a somber reflection of the devastating toll of war and societal rejection on veterans. This ending, while perhaps a powerful artistic statement about the character’s fate, was seen by the filmmakers as potentially too nihilistic for a mainstream audience.

However, the powerful reaction of test audiences against this somber resolution convinced the studio to pursue a different path. The context states that without test audiences, Rambo’s fate would have been sealed. Their desire for Rambo to survive, despite his harrowing ordeal, led to reshoots that gave the character a reprieve, allowing him to be apprehended rather than killed. This decision, influenced by audience sentiment, was pivotal, not only giving John Rambo a future but also paving the way for the hugely successful franchise he would headline. It’s a prime example of how audience feedback can literally be a matter of life or death for beloved cinematic characters, ensuring their stories continue to resonate for years to come.

The stories behind these cinematic transformations offer a compelling glimpse into the delicate balance between artistic vision, commercial viability, and audience expectations. From emotional shifts that redefined character arcs to dramatic rescues that completely averted creative disasters, test screenings have undeniably left their indelible mark on film history. They stand as a testament to the collaborative, often unpredictable, nature of moviemaking, reminding us that sometimes, the collective voice of an early audience can truly save a film and shape the blockbusters and beloved classics we cherish today.

Leave a Reply

Scroll top