Washington, D.C., recently bore witness to a truly extraordinary event, an occurrence unparalleled in decades, as the U.S. Army commemorated its 250th anniversary with a grand parade. The capital city, which is accustomed to political gatherings and protests, encountered a distinct kind of spectacle: a colossal demonstration of military power and history traversing its well – known streets. This was not merely a simple march; it constituted a full – scale presentation involving thousands of soldiers, heavy armored vehicles, and aircraft, all designed to pay homage to two and a half centuries of service and victory.
The preparations alone were indicative of the scale of the endeavor. Residents observed atypical traffic patterns, including flatbed trucks transporting tanks, escorted by police, making their way through bustling thoroughfares such as Rhode Island Avenue. These convoys, serving as a prelude to the main event, induced temporary traffic congestion, signaling that substantial logistical challenges were being addressed to bring this historic display to the core of the nation’s capital.
The parade itself was conceived as a means to exhibit the Army’s lengthy history, from its inception to its modern capabilities. It was promised to be a “spectacular military parade” that was “unprecedented,” according to the President. This was not solely about displaying the current military prowess; it was a well – thought – out effort to narrate the story of the Army’s evolution and impact over 250 years, incorporating elements that encompassed different eras and military capabilities.
1. **The Purpose and Significance: Marking 250 Years of Service** The primary impetus for this remarkable event was the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. This milestone served as the backdrop for organizing a large – scale military parade in Washington, D.C., an occurrence that has been a rarity in recent history. The commemoration aimed to pay tribute to the Army’s extensive and illustrious past, contemplating its contributions and accomplishments over two and a half centuries of safeguarding the nation.
Coinciding with the anniversary were two other momentous dates: Flag Day and the 79th birthday of President Donald Trump. While the President acknowledged that it was his birthday, he underscored that the celebration was for Flag Day and, more significantly, for the Army itself. He declared, “I believe it is high time for us to celebrate to some extent. As you are aware, we have achieved numerous victories,” thereby positioning the parade as an acknowledgment of the Army’s triumphs.
The parade was explicitly conceived to narrate the history of the Army through its participants and equipment. By assembling elements from diverse periods and exhibiting a wide array of capabilities, the event endeavored to offer a visual chronology of the Army’s development and its role in national defense throughout its 250 – year history. It was intended as an all – encompassing tribute to the soldiers, their families, and the equipment that have shaped the institution.
Military equipment: 1991
Perrow: 3/3/3/3
TotalWidth: 271
Footer: Croatian War of Independence,1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo,Lauda Air Flight 004,USAF,Boris Yeltsin,Moby Prince disaster,Bangladesh,dissolution of the Soviet Union,Nigeria Airways Flight 2120
Categories: 1991, All articles with dead external links, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles containing Latin-language text, Articles using Mw magnitude scale, Articles using mb magnitude scale, Articles with dead external links from December 2024, Articles with permanently dead external links, Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from June 2021, Articles with unsourced statements from November 2024, CS1 Italian-language sources (it), CS1 Russian-language sources (ru), CS1 Spanish-language sources (es), Commons category link from Wikidata, Pages using multiple image with auto scaled images, Short description is different from Wikidata, Use mdy dates from November 2024, Wikipedia pending changes protected pages
Summary: 1991 (MCMXCI) was a common year starting on Tuesday of the Gregorian calendar, the 1991st year of the Common Era (CE) and Anno Domini (AD) designations, the 991st year of the 2nd millennium, the 91st year of the 20th century, and the 2nd year of the 1990s decade.
It was the final year of the Cold War, which had begun in 1947. During the year, the Soviet Union collapsed, leaving fifteen sovereign republics and the CIS in its place. In July 1991, India abandoned its policies of dirigism, license raj and autarky and began extensive liberalisation to its economy. This increased GDP but also increased income inequality over the next two decades. A UN-authorized coalition force from 34 nations fought against Iraq, which had invaded and annexed Kuwait in the previous year, 1990. The conflict would be called the Gulf War and would mark the beginning of a since-constant American military presence in the Middle East. The clash between Serbia and the other Yugoslav republics would lead into the beginning of the Yugoslav Wars, which ran through the rest of the decade.
In the context of the apartheid, the year after the liberation of political prisoner Nelson Mandela, the Parliament of South Africa repeals the Population Registration Act, 1950, overturning the racial classification of the population, a key component of apartheid.
The year 1991 saw the rise of a ten-year-long boost of the US domestic economy with the Dow Jones Industrial Average remarkably closing in April at above 3,000 for the first time. This situation would only be cut short by the Dot-com bubble of 2000–2002.
In August, the World Wide Web, originally conceived during the previous year, was released outside CERN to other research institutions starting in January 1991 and publicly announced in August, also establishing the first website ever, “info.cern.ch”. This step was a key factor that led to the mid-1990s public breakthrough of the internet, which would eventually accelerate the already ongoing globalization around the globe.
In terms of popular culture, during this year alternative rock saw a new height of popularity when some of the earliest music exponents of the virtually unknown grunge sound were released, including the influential Nevermind album by Seattle-based band Nirvana in September 1991. It was also in 1991 that hip-hop music reached an unprecedented mainstream level of success. Electronic music derivative forms were also starting to gain momentum and would define, along with the previous scenes, the sound for most of the decade.
Get more information about: 1991
2. **Scale of the Spectacle: A Massive Deployment of Personnel and Equipment** The enormous magnitude of the Army’s 250th Anniversary Parade constituted a defining feature. The event entailed a considerable allocation of resources, assembling a substantial contingent of military personnel along with an impressive assortment of vehicles and aircraft. Approximately 6,600 to 6,700 servicemen and servicewomen took part in the procession, representing various branches and historical epochs of the Army.
Accompanying the thousands of soldiers was a significant assemblage of military hardware. The parade showcased approximately 150 vehicles, spanning from heavy armor to logistical support. Augmenting the visual impact were more than 50 aircraft, which performed flyovers as part of the display. This amalgamation of ground and aerial elements created a multi-dimensional presentation of the Army’s capabilities.
Beyond the conventional military assets, the parade also incorporated some relatively uncommon participants, enhancing the spectacle. The procession featured 34 horses, a tribute to historical cavalry units, and even two mules, reflecting the Army’s long-standing dependence on pack animals in specific terrains. A single dog was also included among the participants, perhaps symbolizing the role of service animals. These figures exemplify the all-encompassing nature of the event, which aimed to display the diverse elements that make up the modern and historical Army.
Military equipment: Indian Armed Forces
Name: Indian Armed Forces
Caption2: Flag of Indian Armed Forces
Branches: army,air force
Headquarters: Ministry of Defence (India),Secretariat Building, New Delhi,New Delhi
CommanderInChief: flagicon,President of India,Droupadi Murmu
CommanderInChiefTitle: Commander in Chief#India
ChiefMinister: flagicon,Narendra Modi
ChiefMinisterTitle: Prime Minister of India
Minister: Flagicon image,Rajnath Singh
Child: true
Label1: Chief of Defence Staff (India)
Data1: Flagicon image,General (India),Anil Chauhan
Label2: Defence Secretary (India)
Data2: Flagicon image,Rajesh Kumar Singh (civil servant),Indian Administrative Service
MinisterTitle: Minister of Defence (India)
Age: 18
Conscription: No
Reaching: 23,116,044
Active: 1,431,000
Ranked: 2nd
Reserve: 1,000,000
Amount: List of countries by military expenditures
PercentGdp: 2.22% (2025/26)
DomesticSuppliers: hidden
Headerstyle: background:#b0c4de
Style: text-align:center;
ForeignSuppliers: Russia
Imports: Currency
Exports: Currency
History: Military history of India,Presidency armies,British Indian Army,Royal Indian Navy,Royal Indian Air Force,Indian National Army,List of wars involving India
Ranks: Indian Army ranks and insignia,Indian Navy ranks and insignia,Indian Air Force ranks and insignia
Country: India
Categories: All Wikipedia articles in need of updating, All Wikipedia articles written in Indian English, All articles lacking reliable references, All articles with dead external links, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles lacking reliable references from August 2016, Articles prone to spam from March 2017, Articles with dead external links from September 2021, Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from February 2023, Articles with unsourced statements from June 2017, CS1: unfit URL, CS1 errors: generic name, CS1 maint: url-status, Commons category link is on Wikidata, Military of India, Ministry of Defence (India), Pages using sidebar with the child parameter, Pages with non-numeric formatnum arguments, Short description matches Wikidata, Use Indian English from July 2025, Use dmy dates from July 2025, Webarchive template wayback links, Wikipedia articles in need of updating from July 2020, Wikipedia articles in need of updating from June 2017, Wikipedia pages semi-protected against vandalism
Summary: The Indian Armed Forces are the military forces of the Republic of India. It consists of three professional uniformed services: the Indian Army, the Indian Navy, and the Indian Air Force. Additionally, the Indian Armed Forces are supported by the Central Armed Police Forces, the Indian Coast Guard, and the Special Frontier Force and various inter-service commands and institutions such as the Strategic Forces Command, the Andaman and Nicobar Command, and the Integrated Defence Staff. The President of India is the Supreme Commander of the Indian Armed Forces but the executive authority and responsibility for national security is vested in the Prime Minister of India and their chosen Cabinet Ministers. The Indian Armed Forces are under the management of the Ministry of Defence of the Government of India. With strength of over 1.4 million active personnel, it is the world’s second-largest military force and has the world’s largest volunteer army. It also has the third-largest defence budget in the world. The Global Firepower Index report lists it as the fourth most-powerful military in the world.
The Indian Armed Forces have been engaged in a number of major military operations, including: the Indo-Pakistani wars of 1947, 1965, and 1971, the Portuguese-Indian War, the Sino-Indian War, the Indo-China War of 1967, the Kargil War, the Siachen conflict, and the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict among others. India honours its armed forces and military personnel annually on Armed Forces Flag Day, 7 December. Armed with the nuclear triad, the Indian Armed Forces are steadily undergoing modernisation, with investments in areas such as futuristic soldier systems and ballistic missile defence systems.
The Department of Defence Production of the Ministry of Defence is responsible for the indigenous production of equipment used by the Indian Armed Forces. It comprises 16 Defence PSUs. India remains one of the largest importer of defence equipment with Russia, Israel, France and the United States being the top foreign suppliers of military equipment. The Government of India, as part of the Make in India initiative, seeks to indigenise manufacturing and reduce dependence on imports for defence.
Get more information about: Indian Armed Forces
3. **The Star Vehicles: Showcasing the Power of M1A2 Abrams Tanks** Among the most highly anticipated participants in the parade were the heavy – armored vehicles, especially the M1A2 Abrams tanks. The relevant context explicitly states the existence of “dozens of M1A2 Abrams tanks” as an integral part of the procession. These modern battle tanks stand as the pinnacle of the Army’s ground combat capabilities, renowned for their formidable firepower and robust protection.
The logistical challenges linked to the transportation of these heavy tanks were conspicuous even prior to the commencement of the parade. Their presence on urban streets necessitated special convoys and escorts, resulting in substantial traffic disruptions. The immense weight of the Abrams tank, which is noted to be approximately 70 tons (63 tonnes), far surpasses the maximum weight capacity of numerous DC roads, as indicated by the DC Department of Transport to be 40 tons (36 tonnes). This weight discrepancy underscored a crucial logistical concern pertaining to potential infrastructure damage.
Despite apprehensions regarding their weight, the decision to incorporate Abrams tanks emphasized the parade’s objective of showcasing current military might. Their inclusion, along with other modern vehicles, stood in stark contrast to the historical elements and provided a definitive demonstration of the Army’s contemporary operational preparedness and technological progress. Their passage through the city constituted a compelling visual, even though it was accompanied by logistical complexities and potential costs.
Military equipment: Transformation of the United States Army
Categories: All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify, All articles needing references cleanup, All articles that are excessively detailed, All articles with dead external links, All articles with style issues, Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify from June 2024, Articles with dead external links from April 2025, Articles with dead external links from March 2025, Articles with dead external links from October 2022, Articles with multiple maintenance issues, Articles with permanently dead external links, Articles with short description, CS1: unfit URL, CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list, Short description matches Wikidata, United States Army, Webarchive template wayback links, Wikipedia articles that are excessively detailed from June 2024, Wikipedia articles with style issues from June 2024, Wikipedia references cleanup from June 2024
Summary: The transformation of the United States Army is part of a
strategy using Multi-Domain Operations (MDO). In 2019, the planning was for Large Scale ground Combat Operations (LSCO) at echelons above the brigade combat team (meaning division-sized units, or larger). Multi-Domain Task Forces (MDTFs) operate in a combatant commander’s theater (area of responsibility).
In 2020, the Army’s 40th Chief of Staff, Gen. James C. McConville, was calling for transformational change, rather than incremental change by the Army.: minute 4:55 In 2021, McConville laid out Aimpoint 2035, a direction for the Army to achieve Corps-level “large-scale combat operations” (LSCO) by 2035, with Waypoints from 2021 to 2028.
In fall 2018, Army Strategy for the next ten years was articulated listeding four Lines of Effort to be implemented. By August 2023, the Army’s 41st Chief of Staff Gen. Randy A. George could lay out his priorities. The priorities are:
Warfighting capability;
Ready combat formations;
Continuous transformation;
Strengthening the profession of arms.
In 2009 an “ongoing campaign of learning” was the capstone concept for force commanders, meant to carry the Army from 2016 to 2028.
New capabilities
In the summer of 2018, the U.S. Army Futures Command (AFC), a new Army command for modernization was activated. The modernization effort, coordinated with FORSCOM, US Army Materiel Command (AMC), and US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC), addresses the long lead times for introducing new materiel and capabilities into the brigades of the Army. This planned Joint capability was demonstrated to the Combatant commanders (who are the “customers” for the capability) and the Joint Chiefs (who advise the government on the importance of this effort) at White Sands Missile Range in September 2020, in an ongoing campaign for achieving integrated deterrence. By 2020 Project Convergence, a campaign of learning, was pressed into service at Yuma Proving Ground, in the Army’s campaign to modernize, by experimental prototype and demonstration of a networking concept; Project Convergence 2021 (PC21) was then a vehicle for the entire DoD, in its Joint Warfighting Concept (JWC) demonstration of Joint all-domain command and control (JADC2). Project Convergence 2022 (PC22) now has a website for candidate entries, even as PC21 was underway in 2021. Analysis is underway in FY2022 to balance modernization and readiness going forward.
Get more information about: Transformation of the United States Army
4. **Other Armored Vehicles: M2 Bradleys and More** While the Abrams tanks garnered considerable attention owing to their size and weight, the parade presented a wide array of other armored vehicles, thereby contributing to the all – encompassing display of the Army’s mechanized forces. The relevant context refers to “other armored vehicles” alongside the tanks, signifying a diverse range of military transport and combat platforms.
Specifically, a photo caption identifies an M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle participating in the parade, which was observed crossing the Memorial Bridge. The Bradley is a tracked vehicle specifically designed to transport infantry into combat zones while offering fire support. Its presence alongside the Abrams tanks showcased the various types of armored vehicles employed by the Army, each fulfilling distinct roles in modern warfare. The inclusion of vehicles such as the Bradley offered a more comprehensive perspective on the Army’s vehicle inventory.
Adding a historical aspect to the armored vehicle display, the parade also incorporated World War II – era armored vehicles. A photo caption verifies that members of the US Army operated these vintage machines as they crossed the Memorial Bridge. This combination of state – of – the – art and historical armor underscored the parade’s objective of narrating the Army’s history, demonstrating the development of its mechanized forces from past conflicts to the present.
Military equipment: Bradley Fighting Vehicle
IsVehicle: true
Name: Bradley Fighting Vehicle
Caption: M2 Bradley
Type: Armored fighting vehicle,Infantry fighting vehicle
Origin: United States
Service: 1981–present
UsedBy: section link
Variants: section link
Designer: FMC Corporation
DesignDate: 1963–1981
Manufacturer: ubli
ProductionDate: ubli
Number: 6,724
Length: 6.55 m
Abbr: on
Order: flip
Width: 3.6 m
Height: 2.98 m
Weight: 27.6 t
Suspension: Torsion bar
Speed: 56 km
VehicleRange: 400 km
Armor: laminate
PrimaryArmament: ubli
SecondaryArmament: M240 machine gun
Engine: Cummins
Crew: 3 + variable number of passengers depending on variant
EnginePower: 600 hp
PwRatio: convert
Categories: All articles lacking reliable references, All articles with dead external links, All articles with unsourced statements, Armored fighting vehicles of the United States, Articles lacking reliable references from June 2016, Articles with dead external links from February 2024, Articles with dead external links from October 2023, Articles with permanently dead external links, Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from February 2022, Articles with unsourced statements from January 2023, Articles with unsourced statements from January 2024, Articles with unsourced statements from September 2022, BAE Systems land vehicles, CS1 Greek-language sources (el), Cold War armored fighting vehicles of the United States, Commons link is locally defined, Military vehicles introduced in the 1980s, Pages using infobox weapon with unknown parameters, Pages using the Kartographer extension, Short description is different from Wikidata, Tracked amphibious vehicles, Tracked armoured fighting vehicles, Tracked reconnaissance vehicles, Webarchive template archiveis links, Webarchive template wayback links, Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from November 2023
Summary: The Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) is an American tracked armored fighting vehicle of the United States developed by FMC Corporation and now manufactured by BAE Systems Land & Armaments, formerly United Defense. It is named for U.S. General Omar Bradley.
The Bradley is designed to transport infantry or scouts with armor protection, while providing covering fire to suppress enemy troops and armored vehicles. Variants include the M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle and the M3 Bradley reconnaissance vehicle. The M2 holds a crew of three—a commander, a gunner and a driver—along with six fully equipped soldiers. The M3 mainly conducts scout missions and carries two scout troopers in addition to the regular crew of three, with space for additional BGM-71 TOW missiles.
In 2014, the U.S. Army selected BAE Systems’ Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV) proposal of a turretless variant of the Bradley to replace over 2,800 M113 armored personnel carriers. Some 2,907 surplus Bradleys will be modified to become AMPVs for the U.S. Army.
Get more information about: Bradley Fighting Vehicle
_14_participates_in_an_air_power_demonstration_near_the_aircraft_carrier_USS_John_C._Stennis_(CVN_74)%2C_not_shown%2C_in_the_Pacific_130424-N-TC437-585.jpg)
5. **Air Power Display: Over 50 Aircraft Overhead** Infusing an impressive vertical dimension into the parade was the incorporation of a substantial aerial element. The event showcased flyovers by “over 50 aircraft,” which soared above the National Mall and along the parade route. This aerial presentation offered a dynamic contrast to the ground – based procession of troops and vehicles, demonstrating the Army’s aviation prowess.
The relevant context refers to military helicopters flying across the National Mall, with the Washington Monument and the US Capitol visible in the distance, as indicated in a photo caption. Although specific types of aircraft other than helicopters are not elaborated upon in the provided text, the large number implies that a diverse array of Army aviation assets participated, potentially encompassing transport, attack, or reconnaissance aircraft.
Integrating air assets into the parade underscored the multi – domain nature of contemporary Army operations. The flyovers served as a visual manifestation of the Army’s capacity to project power from the air, complementing its ground forces. This segment of the parade was presumably a pivotal visual spectacle for attendees and observers, highlighting the all – encompassing scope of the Army’s capabilities on its 250th anniversary.
Military equipment: Anti-aircraft warfare
Categories: All articles needing additional references, All articles with unsourced statements, Anti-aircraft warfare, Articles needing additional references from February 2024, Articles needing additional references from July 2013, Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from April 2019, Articles with unsourced statements from February 2024, Articles with unsourced statements from October 2020, CS1 Bosnian-language sources (bs), CS1 Serbian-language sources (sr), Commons category link is locally defined, Military aviation, Short description is different from Wikidata, Use British English from May 2025, Use dmy dates from January 2025, Warfare by type, Webarchive template wayback links, Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from October 2012
Summary: Anti-aircraft warfare (AAW) is the counter to aerial warfare and includes “all measures designed to nullify or reduce the effectiveness of hostile air action”. It encompasses surface-based, subsurface (submarine-launched), and air-based weapon systems, in addition to associated sensor systems, command and control arrangements, and passive measures (e.g. barrage balloons). It may be used to protect naval, ground, and air forces in any location. However, for most countries, the main effort has tended to be homeland defense. Missile defense is an extension of air defence, as are initiatives to adapt air defence to the task of intercepting any projectile in flight.
Most modern anti-aircraft (AA) weapons systems are optimized for short-, medium-, or long-range air defence, although some systems may incorporate multiple weapons (such as both autocannons and surface-to-air missiles). ‘Layered air defence’ usually refers to multiple ‘tiers’ of air defence systems which, when combined, an airborne threat must penetrate to reach its target; this defence is usually accomplished via the combined use of systems optimized for either short-, medium-, or long-range air defence.
In some countries, such as Britain and Germany during the Second World War, the Soviet Union, and modern NATO and the United States, ground-based air defence and air defence aircraft have been under integrated command and control. However, while overall air defence may be for homeland defence (including military facilities), forces in the field, wherever they are, provide their own defences against airborne threats.
Until the 1950s, guns firing ballistic munitions ranging from 7.62 mm (.30 in) to 152.4 mm (6 in) were the standard weapons; guided missiles then became dominant, except at the very shortest ranges (as with close-in weapon systems, which typically use rotary autocannons or, in very modern systems, surface-to-air adaptations of short-range air-to-air missiles, often combined in one system with rotary cannons).
Get more information about: Anti-aircraft warfare
6. **The Route and Preparations: Navigating Constitution Avenue** The designated route for the US Army’s 250th Anniversary Parade constituted a pivotal element of the event’s logistical framework and presentation. The procession traversed eight blocks along Constitution Avenue Northwest, a well – known thoroughfare in Washington DC. The route commenced at the Lincoln Memorial, an apt historical landmark, and terminated just beyond the White House, situating the military display in close vicinity to key national symbols and power centers.
Conducting a parade of such magnitude, particularly one involving heavy vehicles like M1A2 Abrams tanks, demanded meticulous logistical planning and precautionary measures. An Army spokesperson, Heather J Hagan, expounded on some of these endeavors. Tanks participating in the parade were equipped with rubber pads on their tracks to minimize potential damage to the road surface. This represented a direct effort to address concerns regarding the impact of such heavy vehicles on urban infrastructure not designed to bear their weight.
Moreover, the Army implemented a strategy of placing one – inch – thick steel plates “strategically” along the parade route. These plates were positioned as a “precautionary measure,” especially in areas projected to experience the greatest stress from the heavy vehicles. These measures, though not ensuring the complete elimination of damage, demonstrated an awareness of potential infrastructure challenges and an attempt to mitigate them during the parade’s movement along Constitution Avenue.
Now that we have examined the remarkable scale and the prominent equipment on display, let us delve further into the logistics, historical context, and the broader reception of this momentous event. Staging a spectacle of this scale in a major metropolitan area like Washington D.C. inherently brings with it a unique set of challenges and considerations, extending well beyond the mere movement of personnel and machinery. It has implications for the city’s infrastructure, the daily lives of its residents, and even national discourse.
Military equipment: Abraham Lincoln
Caption: Lincoln in 1863
Alt: Portrait of a bearded Abraham Lincoln showing his head and shoulders
Order: 16th
Office: President of the United States
Vicepresident: longitem,longitem
TermStart: March 4, 1861
TermEnd: April 15, 1865
Children: Robert Todd Lincoln,Edward Baker Lincoln,William Wallace Lincoln,Tad Lincoln
Parents: Thomas Lincoln,Nancy Lincoln
Predecessor: James Buchanan
Successor: Andrew Johnson
State1: Illinois
District1: ushr
TermStart1: March 4, 1847
TermEnd1: March 3, 1849
Predecessor1: John Henry (representative)
Successor1: Thomas L. Harris
StateHouse2: Illinois
Constituency2: Sangamon County, Illinois
TermStart2: December 1, 1834
TermEnd2: December 4, 1842
Predecessor2: Achilles Morris
BirthDate: [object Object]
BirthPlace: Hodgenville, Kentucky
DeathDate: [object Object]
DeathPlace: Washington, D.C., U.S.
DeathCause: Assassination of Abraham Lincoln
Occupation: Politician,lawyer
RestingPlace: Lincoln Tomb
Party: Whig Party (United States),Republican Party (United States)
Otherparty: National Union Party (United States)
Height: 6 ft 4 in
Spouse: [object Object]
Signature: Abraham Lincoln 1862 signature.svg
SignatureAlt: Cursive signature in ink
Branch: Illinois Militia
Serviceyears: April–July 1832
Rank: Captain (United States O-3),Private (United States)
Battles: Black Hawk War
Categories: 1809 births, 1865 deaths, 19th-century members of the Illinois General Assembly, 19th-century members of the United States House of Representatives, 19th-century presidents of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, Activists for African-American civil rights, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, American lawyers admitted to the practice of law by reading law, American military personnel of the Indian Wars, American militia officers, American nationalists, American people of English descent, American surveyors, Articles with Internet Archive links, Articles with Project Gutenberg links, Articles with short description, Assassinated presidents of the United States, Burials at Oak Ridge Cemetery, CS1: long volume value, CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list, Candidates in the 1860 United States presidential election, Candidates in the 1864 United States presidential election, Deaths by firearm in Washington, D.C., Good articles, Hall of Fame for Great Americans inductees, Harrison family (Virginia), Illinois Republicans, Illinois lawyers, Illinois postmasters, Lincoln family, Members of the Illinois House of Representatives, National presidents assassinated in the 19th century, Pages including recorded pronunciations, Pages using Sister project links with hidden wikidata, Pages using multiple image with auto scaled images, Pages using the Phonos extension, People associated with the assassination of Abraham Lincoln, People from LaRue County, Kentucky, People from Macon County, Illinois, People from Spencer County, Indiana, People murdered in 1865, People murdered in Washington, D.C., People of Illinois in the American Civil War, People with mood disorders, Politicians assassinated in the 1860s, Politicians from Springfield, Illinois, Politicians killed in the American Civil War, Presidents of the United States, Republican Party (United States) presidential nominees, Republican Party presidents of the United States, Short description matches Wikidata, Union (American Civil War) political leaders, Use American English from November 2024, Use mdy dates from July 2025, Whig Party members of the United States House of Representatives from Illinois, Wikipedia indefinitely move-protected pages, Wikipedia indefinitely semi-protected pages
Summary: Abraham Lincoln (February 12, 1809 – April 15, 1865) was the 16th president of the United States, serving from 1861 until his assassination in 1865. He led the United States through the American Civil War, defeating the Confederate States of America and playing a major role in the abolition of slavery.
Lincoln was born into poverty in Kentucky and raised on the frontier. He was self-educated and became a lawyer, Illinois state legislator, and U.S. representative. Angered by the Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854, which opened the territories to slavery, he became a leader of the new Republican Party. He reached a national audience in the 1858 Senate campaign debates against Stephen A. Douglas. Lincoln won the 1860 presidential election, prompting the slave states to begin to secede and form the Confederate States of America. A month after Lincoln assumed the presidency, Confederate forces attacked Fort Sumter, starting the Civil War.
Lincoln, a moderate Republican, had to navigate a contentious array of factions in managing conflicting political opinions during the war effort. Lincoln closely supervised the strategy and tactics in the war effort, including the selection of generals, and implemented a naval blockade of Southern ports. He suspended the writ of habeas corpus in April 1861, an action that Chief Justice Roger Taney found unconstitutional in Ex parte Merryman, and he averted war with Britain by defusing the Trent Affair. On January 1, 1863, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared the slaves in the states “in rebellion” to be free. On November 19, 1863, he delivered the Gettysburg Address, which became one of the most famous speeches in American history. He promoted the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which, in 1865, abolished chattel slavery. Re-elected in 1864, he sought to heal the war-torn nation through Reconstruction.
On April 14, 1865, five days after the Confederate surrender at Appomattox, Lincoln was attending a play at Ford’s Theatre in Washington, D.C., when he was fatally shot by Confederate sympathizer John Wilkes Booth. Lincoln is remembered as a martyr and a national hero for his wartime leadership and for his efforts to preserve the Union and abolish slavery. He is often ranked in both popular and scholarly polls as the greatest president in American history.
Get more information about: Abraham Lincoln
7. **Weighing the Costs: The Financial and Infrastructure Impact** Organizing a parade of such magnitude is not merely a logistical challenge; it also entails a substantial financial outlay. According to Army spokesperson Heather J Hagan, the estimated cost for the entire parade fell within a significant range, between 25 million and 45 million. This figure encompasses all facets of the event, from the transportation of equipment and personnel to the necessary preparations and security measures required for such a large – scale public demonstration in the nation’s capital.
A substantial portion of this cost, or at least a significant point of concern, centered around the potential for damage to city infrastructure. Washington DC streets, by design, are not constructed to withstand the immense weight of modern military hardware such as the M1A2 Abrams tank, which weighs approximately 70 tons (63 tonnes). The DC Department of Transport stipulates that the maximum weight capacity for many city roads is considerably lower, around 40 tons (36 tonnes). This significant disparity meant that moving dozens of these heavy vehicles down Constitution Avenue posed a real risk of causing damage.
While the Army spokesperson anticipated “minimal damage to roads,” she refrained from commenting on who would ultimately be responsible for the cost of any necessary repairs. Mayor Muriel Bowser openly expressed her concern about this potential financial burden, stating, “I must admit that I remain concerned about it.” She pointed out that these are primarily local streets, and if they were rendered unusable, the city would need to undertake repairs and then “seek reimbursement from the federal government.” This underscores a significant post – event consideration directly related to the parade’s execution.
Military equipment: Public–private partnership
Categories: All articles with unsourced statements, Articles prone to spam from November 2014, Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from June 2019, CS1 French-language sources (fr), CS1 Spanish-language sources (es), CS1 errors: missing periodical, CS1 maint: archived copy as title, CS1 maint: location missing publisher, Commons category link is on Wikidata, Construction management, Government finances, Government procurement, Privatization, Public economics, Public–private partnership, Securities (finance), Short description is different from Wikidata, Use dmy dates from June 2021, Webarchive template wayback links
Summary: A public–private partnership (PPP, 3P, or P3) is a long-term arrangement between a government and private sector institutions. Typically, it involves private capital financing government projects and services up-front, and then drawing revenues from taxpayers and/or users for profit over the course of the PPP contract. Public–private partnerships have been implemented in multiple countries and are primarily used for infrastructure projects. Although they are not compulsory, PPPs have been employed for building, equipping, operating and maintaining schools, hospitals, transport systems, and water and sewerage systems.
Cooperation between private actors, corporations and governments has existed since the inception of sovereign states, notably for the purpose of tax collection and colonization. Contemporary “public–private partnerships” came into being around the end of the 20th century. They were aimed at increasing the private sector’s involvement in public administration. They were seen by governments around the world as a method of financing new or refurbished public sector assets outside their balance sheet. While PPP financing comes from the private sector, these projects are always paid for either through taxes or by users of the service, or a mix of both. PPPs are structurally more expensive than publicly financed projects because of the private sector’s higher cost of borrowing, resulting in users or taxpayers footing the bill for disproportionately high interest costs. PPPs also have high transaction costs.
PPPs are controversial as funding tools, largely over concerns that public return on investment is lower than returns for the private funder. PPPs are closely related to concepts such as privatization and the contracting out of government services. The secrecy surrounding their financial details complexifies the process of evaluating whether PPPs have been successful. PPP advocates highlight the sharing of risk and the development of innovation, while critics decry their higher costs and issues of accountability. Evidence of PPP performance in terms of value for money and efficiency, for example, is mixed and often unavailable.
Get more information about: Public–private partnership
8. **Navigating Disruptions: Roads, Air Travel, and Daily Life** Beyond the financial ramifications, the preparations and execution of the parade inevitably resulted in substantial disruptions throughout Washington DC. Even in the days preceding the event, residents noticed atypical traffic patterns, including flatbed trucks transporting tanks, which caused temporary traffic congestion on busy thoroughfares such as Rhode Island Avenue. These initial indications were merely a prelude to the more extensive closures required for the main event.
Major roads adjacent to the parade route along Constitution Avenue were shut down for a substantial period, affecting traffic flow and accessibility across the city. These closures were not only for the duration of the parade itself but also extended for up to four days in some areas, reflecting the time required for setup, the event, and subsequent cleanup and assessment. Such prolonged closures necessitate meticulous planning by residents and businesses to navigate the altered urban environment.
Adding an additional layer of disruption, the aerial segment of the parade mandated restrictions on air travel. Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport was required to halt flights for an unspecified duration during the event. This measure constitutes a standard safety precaution when a large number of military aircraft are operating in controlled airspace near a major civilian airport, yet it nonetheless impacted travel for potentially numerous passengers and flights on the day of the parade.
Military equipment: List of time travel works of fiction
Categories: All articles needing additional references, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles needing additional references from September 2024, Articles with Welsh-language sources (cy), Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from May 2018, CS1 errors: ISBN date, Fiction about time travel, History of fiction, Lists of films by topic, Science fiction bibliographies, Science fiction lists, Short description is different from Wikidata, Use dmy dates from October 2024
Summary: Time travel is a common plot element in fiction. Works where it plays a prominent role are listed below. For stories of time travel in antiquity, see the history of the time travel concept.
Get more information about: List of time travel works of fiction
9. **A Rare Occurrence: The First Military Parade Since 1991** This grand exhibition of military prowess was remarkable not solely for its magnitude, but also for its scarcity in recent US history. The Army’s 250th Anniversary Parade denoted the inaugural instance that a military parade of this nature had been conducted in Washington DC since 1991. That preceding event, organized by President George HW Bush, commemorated the return of troops subsequent to the conclusion of the Gulf War.
A comparison between the two events unveils some intriguing particulars regarding their scale. The 1991 parade, which welcomed home Gulf War troops, involved approximately 8,000 troops marching through the capital. While the 2025 parade featured a marginally smaller number of marching troops, roughly 6,600 to 6,700, it substantially enhanced the inclusion of heavy vehicles and aircraft. This alteration in emphasis implies a different type of display, underscoring modern mechanized and aerial capabilities alongside traditional marching units.
The determination to hold a military parade after such an extended hiatus bears its own weight and significance, distinguishing it from typical ceremonial events in Washington DC. It positions the 2025 celebration as a unique historical moment, interrupting a three-decade span without such a large-scale military procession through the core of the nation’s capital. This renders it a reference point for future discussions concerning the appropriateness and impact of showcasing military power in a public, urban environment.
Military equipment: United States Army 250th Anniversary Parade
EventName: United States Army 250th Anniversary Parade
Partof: United States Semiquincentennial
Participants: Donald Trump,President of the United States
Date: [object Object]
Time: 6:30 p.m. planned, actual 6:00 p.m. to avoid rain
Timezone: Eastern Time Zone
Duration: 90 minutes
Location: the Pentagon,Virginia
Budget: $25–$45 million
Categories: 2025 in Virginia, 2025 in Washington, D.C., 2025 in military history, 21st-century history of the United States Army, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Arlington County, Virginia, Articles with short description, Commons category link from Wikidata, June 2025 in the United States, Military parades in the United States, National Mall, Pages using the Kartographer extension, Presidential birthdays in the United States, Second Trump administration controversies, Second presidency of Donald Trump, Short description is different from Wikidata, The Pentagon, United States Semiquincentennial, United States military birthdays, Use American English from May 2025, Use mdy dates from June 2025
Summary: The 250th Birthday of the U.S. Army Grand Military Parade and Celebration (widely referred to as “Trump’s military parade”) took place on June 14, 2025, in Arlington, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., to officially commemorate the 250th anniversary of the traditional date of the founding of the United States Army on June 14, 1775, the oldest of the six branches of the United States Armed Forces. It was part of the celebrations marking the United States Semiquincentennial, the 250th anniversary of the nation’s founding and described as a “soft launch” of official celebrations.
The parade also coincided with both the 79th birthday of Donald Trump, the 45th and 47th president of the United States, and Flag Day. It was the first military parade in Washington D.C. since the 1991 National Victory Celebration held by President George H.W. Bush, which commemorated U.S. soldiers in the involvement and conclusion of the Gulf War.
The parade faced bipartisan criticism due to its high projected cost, estimated at between $25 and $45 million, especially as it coincided with broader government cost-cutting measures. Additional controversy arose from its timing on Trump’s birthday, which critics argued politicized the military and drew comparisons to displays typically seen in authoritarian regimes. The idea for the parade originated during Trump’s first term, when a similar proposal was rejected by the Pentagon over concerns that it would appear overly political. Millions of demonstrators attended nationwide protests against the parade and Trump’s policies on the same day in the largest coordinated protests since the start of the second Trump administration.
The parade involved around 6,600 soldiers from at least 11 corps and divisions nationwide, with at least 150 vehicles, 50 helicopters, warplanes, horses, mules, parachutists, celebrities, seven bands’ musical performances, and several thousand civilian attendees.
Get more information about: United States Army 250th Anniversary Parade
10. **Beyond the Machines: Horses, Mules, and Four-Legged Participants** While tanks and aircraft frequently dominate conversations regarding military prowess, the Army’s 250th Anniversary Parade comprised participants that harked back to a distinct era of service. The procession encompassed a diverse array of elements intended to narrate the history of the Army, and this encompassed acknowledging the enduring role of animals in bolstering military operations throughout history.
The official roster of participants incorporated a contingent of 34 horses. These animals epitomize the legacy of cavalry units, which assumed a pivotal role in warfare for centuries prior to the advent of mechanized transport. Their inclusion functioned as a visual connection to the Army’s past, reminding observers of the evolution of military tactics and logistical support over 250 years. Witnessing horses alongside contemporary armored vehicles generated a striking contrast between eras.
Complementing this historical reference were two mules, also included in the list of the parade’s participants. Mules have historically been indispensable for transporting supplies and equipment in challenging terrains where vehicles cannot readily traverse, demonstrating the Army’s dependence on adaptable logistical solutions. Even a single dog was part of the ensemble, perhaps acknowledging the role of service animals in various capacities throughout the Army’s history. These less conventional participants highlighted the all – encompassing nature of the parade’s narrative, aiming to cover the entire range of the Army’s journey.
Military equipment: Marathon
Event: Marathon
Caption: Orlen Warsaw Marathon
WRmen: flagathlete
ORmen: flagathlete
CRmen: flagathlete
WRwomen: Small
ORwomen: flagathlete
CRwomen: flagathlete
Categories: All articles containing potentially dated statements, All articles lacking reliable references, All articles with dead external links, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles containing potentially dated statements from April 2025, Articles lacking reliable references from May 2018, Articles with dead external links from October 2022, Articles with permanently dead external links, Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from July 2012, Articles with unsourced statements from May 2012, Articles with unsourced statements from November 2023, Athletic culture based on Greek antiquity, CS1: unfit URL, CS1 Dutch-language sources (nl), CS1 German-language sources (de), CS1 maint: archived copy as title, CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown, CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list, Commons category link is on Wikidata, Greek inventions, Long-distance running disciplines, Marathon running, Marathons, Road running distances, Short description is different from Wikidata, Summer Olympic disciplines in athletics, Use dmy dates from November 2020, Webarchive template archiveis links, Webarchive template wayback links, Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from September 2010, Wikisource templates with missing id
Summary: The marathon is a long-distance foot race with a distance of 42.195 kilometres (c. 26 mi 385 yd), usually run as a road race, but the distance can be covered on trail routes. The marathon can be completed by running or with a run/walk strategy. There are also wheelchair divisions. More than 800 marathons are held worldwide each year, with the vast majority of competitors being recreational athletes, as larger marathons can have tens of thousands of participants.
A creation of the French philologist Michel Bréal inspired by a story from Ancient Greece, the marathon was one of the original modern Olympic events in 1896 in Athens. The distance did not become standardized until 1921. The distance is also included in the World Athletics Championships, which began in 1983. It is the only running road race included in both championship competitions (walking races on the roads are also contested in both).
Get more information about: Marathon
11. **Voices from All Sides: Official Commentary and Public Response** As is the case with any significant public event, particularly one that involves the military and a prominent political figure, the Army’s 250th Anniversary Parade elicited a variety of commentary and public reactions. From formal statements to demonstrations of protest, the event emerged as a focal point for diverse perspectives on the Army, its role, and its presentation in the capital.
President Donald Trump, who acknowledged that the parade coincided with his 79th birthday but stressed that it was in honor of Flag Day and the Army, was a pivotal figure in promoting the event. He pledged a “spectacular military parade” that would be “unparalleled,” portraying it as a commemoration of the Army’s history and triumphs. During his address, he made forceful remarks, stating, “If you threaten the American people, our soldiers are coming for you. Your defeat will be inevitable, your demise will be final, and your downfall will be total and complete,” adding, “The Army keeps us free, you make us strong, and tonight, you have made all Americans very proud.” This official narrative centered on strength, history, and pride.
On the contrary, the event attracted criticism and triggered protests. Advisory neighborhood commissioners representing sections of Washington DC were especially vocal, passing a resolution that described military parades as “more characteristic of authoritarian governments than of democracies” and called for the event’s cancellation. Jim Malec, a commissioner, expressed concern about the cost, deeming it “appalling that we are spending $45 million on a parade,” especially in view of recent actions to clear homeless encampments in the same area. These locally elected officials underscored concerns regarding the perceived symbolism and allocation of resources.
Military equipment: 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum
Name: 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum
Title: Torres Strait Islanders,Indigenous Voice to Parliament
Country: Australia
Website: [object Object]
Date: start date
Yes: 6286894
No: 9452792
Invalid: 155545
Electorate: 17671784
Outcome: Not carried. A majority “no” vote nationally and in all states.
Map: Switcher
MapDivision: state or territory, and division
Categories: 2023 elections in Australia, 2023 referendums, Albanese government, All Wikipedia articles written in Australian English, All articles containing potentially dated statements, All articles with self-published sources, Articles containing potentially dated statements from January 2023, Articles with excerpts, Articles with hCards, Articles with imported Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 text, Articles with self-published sources from October 2023, Articles with short description, Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from October 2023, CS1 Tamil-language sources (ta), CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list, Constitutional referendums in Australia, Indigenous Australian politics, October 2023 in Australia, Pages containing links to subscription-only content, Pages with non-numeric formatnum arguments, Short description is different from Wikidata, Use Australian English from March 2023, Use dmy dates from March 2023
Summary: The 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum was a constitutional referendum held on 14 October 2023 in which the proposed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice was rejected. Voters were asked to approve an alteration to the Australian Constitution that would recognise Indigenous Australians in the document through prescribing a body called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice that would have been able to make representations to Federal Parliament and the executive government on “matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples”.
The proposal was rejected nationally and by a majority in every state, thus failing to secure the double majority required for amendment by section 128 of the constitution. The Australian Capital Territory was the only state or territory with a majority of “yes” votes. Analysis of surveys following the referendum identified the main reasons why the majority of Australians voted no was a scepticism of rights for some Australians that are not held by others and a fear of constitutional change.
Get more information about: 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum
12. **Dissent and Demonstrations: The ‘No Kings’ Protests** The parade also functioned as a catalyst for organized public dissent, particularly through the “No Kings” protests. These demonstrations were explicitly directed against President Trump and his administration, perceiving the military parade as a symbol of worrisome political trends. The context indicates that over 2,000 such protests occurred across the United States simultaneously with the parade in Washington DC.
In Washington DC itself, demonstrators were in attendance, and the context reveals that across the nation, protesters labeled President Trump a dictator. This pronounced opposition underscores the political undertones surrounding the event, suggesting that for a substantial portion of the public, the display of military power was not merely a non-political commemoration of the Army’s history but was interpreted through the prism of contemporary political dynamics and leadership style.
President Trump himself anticipated the possibility of protests in advance, issuing a warning that protesters “would be confronted with very heavy force.” This statement, along with the demonstrators’ actions and messages, highlights the contentious nature of the parade for certain segments of the population. The “No Kings” movement explicitly rejected the notion of concentrated power, portraying the military parade as an manifestation of authority they opposed, creating a counter-narrative to the official celebration of military service and history.
Military equipment: 50501 movement
Name: 50501 movement
Formation: [object Object]
FullName: “50 protests. 50 states. 1 movement.”
Logo: 50501 logo.svg
LogoSize: 120
LogoCaption: Official emblem
Location: United States,Canada
Founder: u/
Type: Grassroots organization
Purpose: bulleted list
Methods: Protesting,boycotting,civil resistance
Field: Political movement
Membership: [object Object]
MembershipYear: 2025
LeaderTitle: Leadership
Website: https://www.fiftyfifty.one
Categories: 2025 protests, 50501 movement, All articles lacking reliable references, All articles with dead external links, All articles with unsourced statements, Anti-fascism in the United States, Articles lacking reliable references from June 2025, Articles with dead external links from July 2025, Articles with permanently dead external links, Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from April 2025, Articles with unsourced statements from June 2025, February 2025 in the United States, Left-wing populism in the United States, Progressivism in the United States, Protests against the second presidency of Donald Trump, Protests in the United States, Short description is different from Wikidata, Use mdy dates from February 2025, Wikipedia semi-protected pages
Summary: 50501 (short for “50 protests, 50 states, 1 movement”) is an American progressivist grassroots political organization founded to protest the policies and actions of the second Donald Trump administration in the United States. The group organized several nationwide demonstrations starting on February 5, 2025, with anti-Trump rallies. The group hosted another nationwide protest – named “No Kings on Presidents Day” – on February 17 (Presidents’ Day), and a third demonstration on March 4, 2025. The movement’s membership contributed to the organizing of the April 5, 2025, Hands Off protests, which gathered millions of participants nationwide and was among the largest protests against U.S. president Donald Trump. No Kings” protests took place across the USA (but avoided Washington, D.C.) on June 14, 2025, the day of the U.S. Army 250th Anniversary Parade and Donald Trump’s 79th birthday. These events, in over 2,000 locations and attended by an estimated 5 million people, represent the largest one-day protest in US history.
The movement continues to hold demonstrations nationwide and is active online, locally, and nationally.
Get more information about: 50501 movement
Ultimately, the US Army’s 250th Anniversary Parade constituted a multifaceted event, notable for its magnitude, historical breadth, and the intricate reactions it evoked. It was a day characterized by the thunderous sounds of tanks and the deafening roars of aircraft, a visual historical lesson unfolding along Constitution Avenue. Moreover, it was a moment that ignited debate concerning costs, disruptions, and the very essence of displaying military might within a democratic context. Whether regarded as a proud commemoration of two and a half centuries of service or a contentious political spectacle, the parade left an indelible mark on the capital and functioned as a vivid manifestation of the Army’s past and present, set against the backdrop of contemporary American discourse.
