Let’s be honest—there are a lot of SUVs out there. So many, in fact, that choosing the right one can be overwhelming. The market is absolutely saturated, and every manufacturer seems to have a half-dozen crossovers vying for your attention, each promising the moon and stars in terms of capability, comfort, and cutting-edge tech. But as anyone who’s spent serious time behind the wheel will tell you, not all that glitters is actually gold. The sheer volume of choice, coupled with slick marketing, often makes it tough to distinguish between genuine contenders and vehicles that are, frankly, just taking up space on dealer lots. So, if you’re looking for a smart buy, buckle up, because we’re about to get real.
And while some SUVs truly rise to the top with outstanding value, performance, and reliability, others, well, they just don’t measure up. These are the vehicles that, despite perhaps getting a passing grade in some reviews, privately make seasoned auto enthusiasts and mechanics cringe. They might have a popular badge or a trendy design, but under the surface, they’re riddled with compromises that can turn everyday driving into a chore and long-term ownership into a financial headache. We’re talking about more than just minor quirks; these are fundamental flaws that make them a hard sell for anyone who genuinely cares about their ride or their wallet.
Whether it’s outdated tech that feels like it’s from another decade, lackluster powertrains that struggle to get out of their own way, or just plain poor value for the money, there are a few SUVs we simply wouldn’t recommend to anyone looking for a smart buy. We’ve driven enough of these to know their true colors, and trust us, they’re not pretty. Here’s a look at the first five of eleven SUVs we would skip, and exactly why they didn’t make our cut, bringing you the unvarnished truth that often gets left out of the glossy brochures and superficial reviews.
1. **Jeep Compass**The Jeep Compass is a vehicle that embodies the phrase “looks can be deceiving.” It undeniably “looks the part of a rugged SUV,” with its iconic seven-slot grille and chunky proportions that hint at off-road prowess. However, after putting it through its paces countless times, it becomes painfully clear that “the capability doesn’t match the image.” This isn’t the adventurous spirit you’d expect from a brand synonymous with trailblazing; it’s a front for a vehicle that struggles to deliver on its promises. The disconnect between its visual promise and its actual performance is arguably its biggest sin, leaving drivers feeling short-changed the moment they venture beyond the paved city streets, let alone contemplate anything more challenging.
Delving deeper, the issues with the Compass quickly become apparent. “The engine is weak,” and that’s putting it mildly. It often feels strained, especially when attempting to merge onto a highway or tackling even a moderate incline, making acceleration a sluggish and noisy affair. This lack of power isn’t just an annoyance; it impacts confidence and the overall driving experience, undermining any sense of ruggedness the exterior projects. Moreover, the interior, despite some attempts at modern touches, “feels cheap in places,” with noticeable hard plastics and an uninspiring layout that reminds you this isn’t a premium offering. These tangible shortcomings collectively contribute to a driving experience that falls far short of expectations, particularly when considering the brand’s heritage.
Beyond the driving dynamics, the Compass also “falls short on fuel efficiency.” In an era where even more capable SUVs are pushing for better MPG figures, the Compass lags behind, making it a more expensive proposition at the pump than its performance would suggest. This combination of a weak engine, questionable interior quality, and poor fuel economy creates a vehicle that’s hard to justify. Even for a brand known for its loyal following, “even die-hard Jeep fans might find themselves frustrated by the lack of refinement here.” It feels like a missed opportunity to create a truly compelling compact SUV, instead delivering a package that’s fundamentally compromised.
The overarching problem with the Compass is that it asks for your hard-earned money based on an illusion of capability and adventure, but then fails to deliver on the basics. While the psychological appeal of a Jeep badge is strong, implying a sense of security and freedom, the reality of the Compass exposes the gap between perception and truth. Its design might lure you in, but the ownership experience quickly reveals the compromises in engineering and execution. For the same money, we’d echo the sentiment that “we’d go for a Mazda CX-5 or Hyundai Tucson—both are better-equipped and more enjoyable to drive,” offering a far more polished and rewarding experience without the pretense.
Read more about: Unleash the Beast: Exploring Pickup Trucks with Unrivaled Towing and Payload Capabilities
2. **Mitsubishi Outlander Sport**The Mitsubishi Outlander Sport feels less like a contemporary crossover and more like a relic from a bygone era. It’s a prime example of a vehicle that has simply stagnated, feeling “stuck in the past.” While Mitsubishi has occasionally thrown “a few styling tweaks over the years” to keep up appearances, these superficial changes couldn’t mask the fundamental truth: “the engine, interior, and overall experience haven’t evolved much since 2011.” This isn’t just a minor complaint; it points to a serious lack of investment in a segment that has seen dramatic advancements from competitors, leaving the Outlander Sport hopelessly outclassed and outmatched.
This lack of evolution translates directly into a decidedly underwhelming driving experience. The engine, feeling underpowered and unrefined, strains under pressure, and the transmission often hunts for gears, making for noisy and inefficient acceleration. It’s “basic—too basic” for modern expectations. You might forgive some simplicity in a budget offering, but the Outlander Sport takes it to an extreme, sacrificing comfort, features, and even basic driving enjoyment. Crucially, “the ride is anything but smooth,” transmitting every road imperfection directly into the cabin, leading to a jarring and uncomfortable journey that quickly saps the pleasure out of driving, whether it’s a short city hop or a longer highway cruise.
The context’s criticism of certain SUV construction methods—especially older designs not being “comprehensively redesigned to be safely used as passenger vehicles”—resonates strongly with the Outlander Sport’s plight. Its dated platform and lack of modern refinement are hallmarks of a vehicle that hasn’t kept pace with evolving safety and comfort standards, which are now core expectations for passenger vehicles. This isn’t just about bells and whistles; it’s about the fundamental engineering that makes a car feel secure, composed, and pleasant to drive. The Outlander Sport often feels like a vehicle still built on older truck-like principles, without the sophisticated integration found in modern unibody designs, leading to its poor handling and uncomfortable ride.
We’ve tested countless budget crossovers, and it’s clear that “better budget crossovers with far more comfort, features, and value” are readily available. The Outlander Sport struggles to compete on any front that truly matters to today’s buyers, from connectivity features to dynamic performance. Unless you’re absolutely fixated on “sacrificing tech and performance just to save a few bucks,” there are a myriad of better options out there that offer a more contemporary and enjoyable ownership experience. This SUV, sadly, is a stark reminder that sometimes, holding onto the past means getting left behind entirely.
Read more about: Beyond the Battery: 12 Smart Ways to Slash Your Car’s Emissions (No EV Needed!)
3. **Ford EcoSport**The Ford EcoSport is one of those vehicles that makes you question design choices at almost every turn. “We tried to like the EcoSport, we really did,” but its array of quirks and compromises made it an exercise in frustration. From the moment you approach the rear, the “odd swing-out tailgate” presents an immediate practical hurdle, requiring more space to open than a conventional liftgate – a significant inconvenience in tight urban parking scenarios. This single design decision immediately signals a vehicle that prioritizes style over usability, which is a cardinal sin in the utilitarian SUV segment.
Inside, the compromises continue, hitting hard where it matters most for passengers. The “cramped rear seat” renders it impractical for anything more than short trips with small children, and even then, comfort is severely lacking. Compounding these ergonomic woes is an “underpowered engine” that struggles to deliver adequate motivation, particularly when attempting to accelerate from a standstill or overtake. This combination makes the EcoSport feel breathless and lethargic, undermining any pretense of agility for city driving. The vehicle’s driving dynamics are further hampered by a “bouncy ride,” which never settles down, making for an unsettled and tiring experience on anything but perfectly smooth asphalt.
The EcoSport’s struggles are emblematic of what happens when a manufacturer attempts to fit a global platform into a market with different demands, and cuts too many corners in the process. The context points out general criticisms of large SUVs having “longer braking distances” and a “higher center of gravity” increasing rollover risk. While the EcoSport is a compact SUV, its bouncy ride and compromised handling echo the feeling of a vehicle that hasn’t been optimally tuned for nuanced road dynamics. Mike Winter, a long-time owner of MDP Diesel & Auto Repair, starkly summarizes its woes, calling it a “terrible drive, with major engine issues/failures and high repair costs,” reinforcing the notion that its cheap entry price often leads to expensive problems down the road.
Ultimately, while the EcoSport might be “small enough for city driving, sure,” the crucial follow-up is that “so are plenty of other compact SUVs that don’t feel like a compromise.” The segment is fiercely competitive, and the EcoSport’s dated interior and fundamental flaws mean it simply cannot hold its own against rivals that offer superior refinement, better performance, and a more pleasant overall ownership experience. In a market teeming with capable and comfortable alternatives, adding the EcoSport’s “bouncy ride and dated interior” to the mix just seals its fate. We just can’t recommend it when the competition is this fierce, especially when the core driving dynamics and reliability are so heavily questioned.
Car Model Information: 2021 Ford EcoSport SE
Name: Ford EcoSport
Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company
Production: 2003–2022
ModelYears: 2014–2022 (Europe) ,2018–2022 (North America)
Class: Subcompact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: Sport utility vehicle
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout
Categories: 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All articles with bare URLs for citations, All articles with unsourced statements
Summary: The Ford EcoSport ( EK-oh-sport) is a subcompact crossover SUV (B-segment) manufactured by Ford between 2003 and 2022.
The first-generation model was developed and built in Brazil by Ford Brazil since 2003, at the Camaçari plant. The second-generation model was launched in 2012, which was assembled in factories in India, Thailand, Russia and Romania. The vehicle entered the European market in 2014 and the North American market in 2018. It was sold in both until its discontinuation after the 2022 model year. Throughout its existence, the EcoSport shared its platform with the Fiesta.
Get more information about: Ford EcoSport
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Ford Model: EcoSport
Price: $12,200 Mileage: 96,879 mi.
Read more about: The Moment of Regret: 14 Compacts Drivers Wished They Never Saw the Price Tag At the Dealer
4. **Chevrolet Trax (Pre-2024)**The first-generation Chevrolet Trax, specifically models predating 2024, never managed to stake a real claim in the compact SUV segment. It “always felt more like a placeholder than a serious contender,” a vehicle rolled out to simply fill a slot in the lineup rather than to genuinely impress. There was a palpable lack of effort, a sense that it existed merely to offer a low-cost entry into the burgeoning crossover market without any real ambition to excel. This approach, unfortunately, resulted in a vehicle that was mediocre at best and frustrating at worst, leaving many drivers wondering what the point was.
From a driving enthusiast’s perspective, the first-gen Trax was a deeply uninspired machine. It was “small, slow, and uninspired—inside and out.” The engine lacked any semblance of enthusiasm, making acceleration a rather labored affair, while the handling was vague and disconnected, providing little to no feedback to the driver. The interior, much like its performance, was bland and utilitarian, devoid of character or premium touches, confirming the impression that this vehicle was built to a strict budget with little thought given to occupant experience. It’s the kind of car that fades into the background, leaving no lasting impression other than its sheer ubiquity in rental fleets.
This lack of inspiration and value ties into broader critiques of how some SUVs are positioned in the market. The classification of SUVs as “light trucks” in the United States has often created a loophole, allowing manufacturers to avoid certain fuel economy and size regulations. This “light truck exemption” can lead to vehicles like the early Trax being developed with less stringent requirements, potentially contributing to designs that are less refined and less fuel-efficient than their passenger car counterparts. The result is a vehicle that might offer a higher driving position but compromises significantly on the driving dynamics and overall quality found in sedans or better-engineered crossovers, ultimately feeling like a “corporate scam designed to increase profit margins for the auto industry” at the expense of genuine value for the consumer.
“We’ve driven enough of them to know they’re better left in rental fleets.” These aren’t the cars you aspire to own; they’re the cars you get when your preferred choice isn’t available. While it’s important to acknowledge that “the newer models are a huge improvement,” any iteration “pre-2024 just doesn’t deliver enough value to justify the purchase.” If you’re currently shopping used, you owe it to yourself to explore other options. There are simply “far better vehicles in the same price range” that offer more power, better interiors, superior driving dynamics, and a more fulfilling ownership experience than the forgettable first-gen Chevrolet Trax.
Car Model Information: 2025 Chevrolet Trax FWD 2RS
Name: Chevrolet Trax
Manufacturer: General Motors
Aka: unbulleted list
Production: 2013–present
BodyStyle: SUV
Predecessor: unbulleted list
Successor: unbulleted list
Categories: 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Articles with short description
Summary: The Chevrolet Trax is a compact crossover SUV manufactured by General Motors and marketed under the Chevrolet brand since 2013, currently in its second generation.
The first generation model was released globally in 2013 as the smallest, entry-level crossover SUV offering from the brand. Development and production were centered in South Korea by GM Korea. A restyled model was also produced as the Buick Encore in North America and as the Opel/Vauxhall Mokka in Europe.
In several markets, the vehicle was marketed as the Chevrolet Tracker, and as the Holden Trax in Australia and New Zealand. The Trax became available in Canada, Mexico, Germany, South Korea, Lebanon, United Arab Emirates, and Europe for the 2013 model year and was released in the United States for the 2015 model year.
In 2019, GM released the replacement of the Trax for China and Latin America, the Tracker. The first-generation Trax continued to be marketed in North America, South Korea, and several other markets until 2022, when it was replaced by the larger second-generation Trax due for the 2024 model year. The second-generation Trax is also marketed in China as the Chevrolet Seeker.
Get more information about: Chevrolet Trax
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Chevrolet Model: Trax
Price: $25,585 Mileage: 4,085 mi.
5. **Dodge Journey**The Dodge Journey is a prime example of a vehicle that lingered far past its expiration date, a ghost of an SUV that continued to haunt showrooms even after it should have been put out to pasture. This SUV “was outdated long before it was discontinued,” a statement that speaks volumes about the manufacturer’s commitment, or rather, lack thereof, to keeping it competitive. Even in its final model years, it felt like a relic, unable to keep pace with the rapidly evolving automotive landscape and the increasingly sophisticated expectations of buyers.
One of the most glaring anachronisms that defined the Journey’s dated nature was its transmission. “Even in its final model years, the Journey still used a 4-speed transmission—yes, you read that right.” In an era where 6, 8, and even 10-speed automatics had become the norm for efficiency and refinement, a 4-speed felt laughably archaic. This choice severely hampered both its performance and its fuel economy, making for a sluggish and inefficient driving experience. Coupled with this, “the tech was outdated” from infotainment to safety features, providing a stark contrast to the modern connectivity and driver aids found in rivals. The “ride quality was below average,” further cementing its status as a vehicle that simply couldn’t deliver a comfortable or engaging drive.
The Journey’s existence, prolonged despite its obvious shortcomings, highlights a problematic industry trend where perceived affordability sometimes trumps genuine value and quality. While it was indeed an “affordable” option, that low price came with significant hidden costs in terms of driver frustration, poor fuel economy, and a general lack of refinement that eroded the ownership experience. This situation resonates with the critiques of SUVs being sold under a “light truck exemption,” where cost-cutting on regulation compliance often translates into a less sophisticated, less appealing product for the consumer, prioritizing profit margins over product excellence.
The overall feeling was that “Dodge just gave up on updating it,” leaving it to languish while competitors forged ahead. We get that it was affordable, and for some budget shoppers, that might be the primary draw. However, we firmly believe that “even budget shoppers deserve better.” The compromises were simply too great, too fundamental, to overlook. The Dodge Journey, with its antiquated mechanics and dismal driving experience, earns “a hard no from us” – a definitive sign to steer clear, no matter how tempting the initial price tag might seem for a vehicle that has so little to offer in return for long-term satisfaction.
As we continue our unfiltered journey through the SUV landscape, it’s crucial to remember that the glossy ads often paint a very different picture from the reality behind the wheel. The issues we’ve uncovered aren’t just minor inconveniences; they’re fundamental compromises that affect everything from daily commutes to long-term financial health. These aren’t just vehicles that are ‘okay’; these are the ones that, frankly, leave us scratching our heads wondering why anyone would opt for them when truly superior alternatives exist. It’s about separating the marketing hype from the driving truth.
We’ve covered five contenders that simply don’t make the cut, but unfortunately, our list of vehicles that quietly earn a thumbs-down from seasoned pros is far from exhausted. The automotive industry, with its drive for ever-increasing profit margins, sometimes pushes models that prioritize market presence over actual product excellence. This often leads to vehicles being classified as ‘light trucks,’ allowing them to skirt stricter regulations, a strategy that, for consumers, often translates into less refined, less efficient, and ultimately, less satisfying vehicles. So, let’s peel back the layers on six more SUVs that should probably stay off your shopping list.
Car Model Information: 2020 Dodge Journey SE Value
Name: Dodge Journey
Caption: 2012 Dodge Journey
Manufacturer: Dodge
Aka: Fiat Freemont,Dodge JC (Japan),Dodge JCUV (China)
Production: 2008–2020
ModelYears: 2009–2020,2011–2015 (Freemont)
Assembly: Toluca, Mexico
Designer: Ryan Nagode
Class: Mid-size crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Platform: Mitsubishi GS platform
Related: Chrysler 200,Chrysler Sebring,Dodge Avenger
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout
Engine: ubl
Transmission: Ultradrive#40TES/41TES
Wheelbase: 2890 mm
Abbr: on
Order: flip
Length: 192.4 in
Width: 72.2 in
Height: 66.6 in
Weight: 3818 lb
Predecessor: Fiat Ulysse,Fiat Croma
Successor: Dodge Journey (2021)
Categories: 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All articles with dead external links, All articles with unsourced statements
Summary: The Dodge Journey is a mid-size crossover SUV manufactured and marketed by Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ Dodge brand for model years 2009 to 2020 over a single generation, with a facelift for the 2011 model year. The Journey was styled by Ryan Nagode, and was marketed globally in both left- and right-hand drive, including as the Fiat Freemont.
Internally identified as the JC49, the Journey shares FCA’s global D-segment platform with the Dodge Avenger and a nearly identical wheelbase to the outgoing short-wheelbase (SWB) Dodge Caravan.
Having debuted at the 2007 Frankfurt Motor Show, the Journey subsequently appeared at the 2009 Frankfurt Motor Show. All models were manufactured in Mexico at FCA’s Toluca Assembly facility, with just over 1.1 million manufactured before production ended in 2020.
Get more information about: Dodge Journey
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Dodge Model: Journey
Price: $13,988 Mileage: 81,197 mi.
Read more about: Legends of Asphalt: The Definitive Guide to the American Muscle Car, from the Iconic Pontiac Firebird to the Enduring Chevy Camaro
6. **Nissan Rogue Sport**We really wanted to champion this smaller sibling to the popular Rogue, a compact crossover that promised the right size for urban dwellers and potentially better agility. On the surface, it ‘looks good on the outside,’ with styling cues that are undeniably appealing to many. Nissan has certainly mastered the art of making its vehicles presentable in the showroom, creating an initial impression that it might be a genuinely compelling option in a crowded segment. But as we’ve learned repeatedly in this business, external aesthetics are only skin deep, and a pretty face can hide a multitude of sins beneath.
Unfortunately, the moment you put your foot down, the illusion quickly shatters. The Rogue Sport is fundamentally ‘underpowered,’ making acceleration a laborious and often frustrating experience. This isn’t just about winning drag races; it’s about confident merging onto highways, effortlessly tackling inclines, and generally feeling like the vehicle has enough grunt to get out of its own way. Compounding this power deficit is an engine that’s simply ‘noisy,’ creating a rather unpleasant soundtrack for every drive. It’s the kind of constant drone that reminds you the powertrain is working far too hard, often without delivering commensurate results, which quickly wears thin on longer journeys.
Adding insult to injury, ‘the CVT makes driving feel like a chore.’ Nissan has been a proponent of Continuously Variable Transmissions for a long time, promising efficiency and smoothness, but in the Rogue Sport, it often translates into a detached, rubber-band-like sensation that utterly drains any joy from the driving experience. There’s no crisp shift, no engaging connection between driver input and vehicle response—just a relentless, rev-heavy climb that feels far removed from actual performance. This fundamental flaw in the powertrain architecture is a deal-breaker for anyone who appreciates even a modicum of driving enjoyment.
Beyond the lackluster performance, the interior, despite its outward appearance, ‘isn’t all that roomy either.’ While a compact crossover isn’t expected to be a cavern, the Rogue Sport struggles to maximize its interior volume for both passengers and cargo, making it a less practical choice than many rivals. The combination of an underwhelming drive, excessive noise, and compromised interior space means that ‘with so many better options in the compact crossover segment, this one just doesn’t make the cut for us.’ It’s a classic case of an SUV failing to deliver on the core promises of practicality and enjoyable mobility.
Car Model Information: 2024 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Premium
Name: Nissan Qashqai
Caption: 2024 Nissan Qashqai (J12B)
Manufacturer: Nissan
Aka: Nissan Dualis (Japan and Australia, 2006–2013),Nissan Rogue Sport (United States, 2017–2022)
Production: 2006–present
Class: Compact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: Sport utility vehicle
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive,Front-engine, four-wheel-drive
Alt: White Nissan Qashqai (J12)
Categories: 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in British English, All articles containing potentially dated statements
Summary: The Nissan Qashqai () is a compact crossover SUV (C-segment) designed and produced by the Japanese car manufacturer Nissan since 2006. The first generation of the vehicle was sold as the Nissan Dualis (Japanese: 日産・デュアリス, Hepburn: Nissan Dyuarisu) in Japan and Australia, and Qashqai in the rest of the world. The second generation, launched in late-2013 for the 2014 model year, was not sold in Japan and was badged as the Qashqai in all countries it was sold, except in the United States, where it was rebadged as the Nissan Rogue Sport. Since the third and latest generation model launched in 2021, the Qashqai is available with hybrid powertrains.
Nissan named the vehicle after the Qashqai people, who live in mountainous Central and Southwestern Iran. As of 2023, for the European and Australian market the Qashqai is positioned between the Juke and the X-Trail in Nissan’s crossover SUV lineup with the latter sharing platform with the Qashqai.
Get more information about: Nissan Qashqai
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Nissan Model: Rogue Sport
Price: $31,463 Mileage: 33,139 mi.
Read more about: Rolling Regret: 6 Trucks Owners Wish They Had Left Sitting on the Dealer’s Pavement
7. **Toyota C-HR**Toyota holds a legendary status for reliability, and rightly so. Many of us implicitly trust the badge, expecting bulletproof dependability and sensible engineering. So, when the C-HR arrived, it was met with a degree of optimism, especially given its undeniably ‘bold design’ that stood out from the usually more conservative Toyota lineup. It was fun, quirky, and tried to inject a dose of personality into a segment that often felt generic. However, as the saying goes, style often comes at a price, and with the C-HR, that price was paid in practicality.
The striking exterior design, while visually appealing, ‘compromises rear visibility, cargo space, and headroom.’ This isn’t a small sacrifice; these are core functionalities that define the utility of an SUV. Drivers often find themselves craning their necks to see out the back, a significant safety concern. Rear passengers, particularly adults, will quickly feel claustrophobic due to limited headroom and the constricted feeling created by the sweeping roofline and small rear windows. Moreover, the cargo area is surprisingly tight for a vehicle of its footprint, undermining the very reason many opt for an SUV over a traditional sedan—versatility.
Furthermore, the C-HR’s strategic limitations are a glaring oversight for many potential buyers. Critically, it launched ‘without the option for all-wheel drive,’ which severely ‘limits its appeal in climates where that matters.’ For a vehicle marketed as a crossover, the absence of AWD is a serious drawback, especially in regions with snow or frequent wet weather where the added traction provides essential peace of mind. This decision felt like a misstep, creating an SUV that looked like an adventurer but was designed for perpetually sunny, flat roads.
Given these significant compromises, and despite Toyota’s strong reputation, the C-HR feels like a vehicle that tried too hard to be different and lost sight of the fundamentals. The context’s general discussion about SUVs often sacrificing practical design for perceived ruggedness or style rings true here. It’s a prime example of an automaker pushing a design-first agenda without fully considering the real-world implications for its users. For a truly sensible and functional Toyota crossover, ‘we’d recommend the Corolla Cross instead—it delivers more function with the same Toyota dependability,’ offering a far more balanced and genuinely useful package without the C-HR’s stylistic drawbacks.
Car Model Information: 2018 Toyota C-HR XLE Premium
Name: Toyota C-HR
Caption: Toyota C-HR 1.8 Hybrid (ZYX20, Europe)
Manufacturer: Toyota
Aka: FAW Toyota
Production: 2016–present
Class: Subcompact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Platform: Toyota TNGA-C platform
Layout: unbulleted list
Categories: 2020s cars, ASEAN NCAP small off-road, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in British English, All articles with dead external links
Summary: The Toyota C-HR (Japanese: トヨタ C-HR, Hepburn: Toyota Shīeichiāru) is a subcompact crossover SUV manufactured and marketed by Japanese automaker Toyota since 2016. Since 2020, it is positioned between the Yaris Cross and Corolla Cross in Toyota’s crossover SUV range.
The first-generation C-HR was available in many regions, including Japan, China, North America, Europe, Southeast Asia, and Australasia, and was produced in four countries. Since the release of the second-generation C-HR in 2023, availability of the C-HR has been limited to Europe and Australia, with production centralised in Turkey. The Corolla Cross, released in 2020, has largely taken over the model’s positioning outside Europe.
Get more information about: Toyota C-HR
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Toyota Model: C-HR
Price: $16,710 Mileage: 69,840 mi.
Read more about: Walk Away Now: 10 SUVs That Are Guaranteed to Bring Buyer’s Remorse
8. **Buick Encore (First Gen)**Buick, often associated with a mature, comfortable, and somewhat understated luxury, attempted to carve out a niche in the burgeoning compact SUV market with the first-generation Encore. The aim was to offer ‘a small, upscale SUV,’ blending urban maneuverability with a touch of premium refinement. It was an ambitious goal, hoping to attract a new demographic to the brand. However, as is often the case with such ventures, the execution ‘didn’t quite stick the landing,’ leaving a gap between aspiration and reality that was difficult to ignore.
From the moment you step inside, the sense of a ‘tight cabin’ is immediately apparent. While compactness is inherent in the segment, the Encore felt more constricted than clever, particularly for adult passengers. This spatial limitation isn’t just about comfort; it impacts the perception of value, especially when the vehicle is positioned as ‘upscale.’ What further undermined its premium aspirations was a ‘powertrain [that] lacks punch,’ feeling strained and unrefined under acceleration. It struggled to deliver the smooth, effortless propulsion one expects from a vehicle with a premium badge, making highway merges and uphill climbs feel far more arduous than they should.
The overall experience simply ‘doesn’t match the premium price’ Buick asked for the first-gen Encore. Consumers expect a certain level of sophistication, performance, and material quality when paying extra, and the Encore often fell short on these counts. This disparity highlights a common issue in the SUV market: the perceived value often doesn’t align with the actual product, particularly when manufacturers try to stretch a platform or brand into a segment it’s not quite suited for. The “light truck exemption” allowing certain vehicles to bypass stricter regulations can lead to such compromises being more pronounced in these ‘entry-luxury’ segments.
Our extensive testing revealed that ‘we found better quality and comfort in mainstream alternatives like the Honda HR-V or Kia Seltos.’ These competitors, often priced more competitively, delivered a more rounded and satisfying package, proving that a premium badge alone isn’t enough to justify shortcomings in core areas. The first-gen Encore serves as a reminder that sometimes, trying to be ‘upscale’ on a budget can backfire, resulting in a vehicle that neither fully embraces its premium ambitions nor offers compelling mainstream value. ‘If you’re shopping Encore, we suggest going for a newer generation or skipping it altogether,’ because the initial offering simply didn’t earn its stripes.
Car Model Information: 2020 Buick Encore Preferred
Name: Buick Encore
Manufacturer: General Motors
Production: 2012–2022
ModelYears: 2013–2022
Class: Subcompact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Successor: Buick Envista
Categories: 2010s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Articles with short description, Buick vehicles
Summary: The Buick Encore is a subcompact crossover SUV built by General Motors from 2012 to 2022. It is subcompact crossover SUV marketed by Buick and its fourth SUV overall after the Rendezvous, Rainier, and Enclave.
The “Encore” designation was previously used by American Motors Corporation (AMC) for the subcompact two and four-door hatchback variants of the U.S.-built front-wheel drive Renault Alliance from 1984 to 1987.
Get more information about: Buick Encore
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Buick Model: Encore
Price: $13,990 Mileage: 64,227 mi.
9. **Land Rover Discovery Sport**Ah, Land Rover. The name conjures images of rugged capability, aristocratic luxury, and adventurous spirit. So naturally, ‘it’s a Land Rover, so we expected more’ from the Discovery Sport. On paper, and indeed in photos, it ‘looks great and promises capability,’ embodying that distinctive blend of British elegance and off-road readiness. This is the aspirational vehicle for many, a symbol of freedom and prestige. However, the reality of owning and living with a Discovery Sport often veers sharply away from this idyllic vision, plunging owners into a world of frustration and unexpected expense.
The immediate allure of a Land Rover badge quickly fades when confronted with the glaring issues that plague the Discovery Sport: ‘unreliable electronics, frequent trips to the shop, and a resale value that drops like a rock.’ These aren’t minor inconveniences; they’re fundamental strikes against a vehicle that purports to be a luxury item. Electrical gremlins can manifest in countless ways, from infotainment malfunctions to critical system failures, turning a premium experience into a constant headache. Frequent repair visits are not only costly but also inconvenient, eroding trust in the brand and the vehicle itself.
Moreover, the financial hit from depreciation is severe, making the Discovery Sport a particularly poor investment. This resonates strongly with the broader criticisms aimed at Land Rover, as auto expert Mike Winter notes about the Range Rover model, citing ‘terrible depreciation and resale value, very high repair costs…electrical issues, coolant issues, turbo issues.’ Chris Pyle echoes this for the Discovery, stating, ‘They are expensive to maintain doing just general maintenance and when they fail, the parts and labor are high.’ It becomes clear that ‘luxury shouldn’t come with this much hassle.’ The dream of adventure quickly turns into the nightmare of a rapidly emptying wallet and constant trips to the service department.
This isn’t just about individual flaws; it speaks to a systemic issue within certain luxury brands where the allure of the badge overshadows the practical realities of ownership. The psychological pull of perceived safety and status, as discussed in the broader context of SUVs, leads buyers to overlook these glaring problems. But for anyone who values their hard-earned money and their peace of mind, the message is clear: ‘We’ve had our fair share of experiences with costly Land Rover repairs, and unless you’re leasing or have deep pockets, this one isn’t worth the stress.’ It’s a costly lesson in brand perception versus real-world reliability.
Car Model Information: 2024 Jeep Wrangler Sport
Name: Land Rover Discovery Sport
Manufacturer: Jaguar Land Rover
Production: 2014–present
ModelCode: L550
Assembly: Jaguar Land Rover Halewood,Changshu,Itatiaia,Pune
Designer: Gerry McGovern
Platform: Jaguar Land Rover car platforms#D8
Related: Range Rover Evoque,Jaguar E-Pace,Tata Harrier
Engine: ubl
Motor: ubl
Transmission: ubl
Wheelbase: Convert
Length: Convert
Width: Convert
Height: Convert
Weight: Convert
Sp: uk
Class: Compact crossover SUV#Luxury vehicles
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: unbulleted list
Predecessor: Land Rover Freelander
Categories: 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in British English, Articles with short description, CS1: unfit URL
Summary: The Land Rover Discovery Sport (internal code L550) is a compact luxury crossover SUV produced by British automotive company Jaguar Land Rover since 2014, under their Land Rover marque, and since 2017 their best-selling model.
Introduced in late 2014, it replaces the Freelander in a revised Land Rover range of vehicles, with Discovery joining Range Rover as a sub-brand. Contrary to its predecessor, the slightly larger car is also available in a seven seat layout.
The pre-facelift Discovery Sport is based on the JLR D8/LR-MS platform, customised for off-road applications, and is powered by a range of four cylinder petrol and diesel engines. It is the first Discovery built with a unibody structure.
Land Rover described the facelifted Discovery Sport as being based on the JLR PTA platform, a rebrand of the D8. It is also used by the Jaguar E-Pace and L551 version of Range Rover Evoque.
Get more information about: Land Rover Discovery Sport
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Land Rover Model: Discovery Sport
Price: $35,495 Mileage: 13,505 mi.
Read more about: Declassified Secrets: The CIA, Remote Viewing, and Ingo Swann’s Startling Claims of an Alien Presence on the Moon – ‘They Told Us to Stay Away’
10. **Hyundai Kona EV (Pre-2024)**Hoy, credit where credit is due: ‘We give Hyundai credit for jumping into the EV game early’ with the Kona EV. In an era when many traditional automakers were still cautiously dipping their toes into electrification, Hyundai bravely pushed forward, offering an accessible electric vehicle to the masses. The initial enthusiasm was certainly justified; it represented a significant step towards mainstream EV adoption. However, despite this commendable effort, the ‘pre-2024 Kona EV left us underwhelmed’ in several key areas, highlighting the rapid pace of development in the electric vehicle segment.
One of the most immediate drawbacks for anyone spending significant time behind the wheel was that ‘the ride is stiff.’ While some might tolerate a firmer suspension in a sporty car, the Kona EV’s ride quality often verged on uncomfortable, transmitting too much of the road’s imperfections into the cabin. This compromises the daily driving experience, especially for those looking for a comfortable commuter. Furthermore, in true compact SUV fashion, ‘rear seating is cramped,’ making it a less-than-ideal choice for families or anyone regularly transporting adult passengers. The practical utility, a key selling point for any SUV, was noticeably diminished.
Perhaps the most telling sign of its early entry into the market was that ‘the tech already feels dated.’ In the fast-evolving world of electric vehicles, infotainment systems, driver-assist features, and battery management software advance at a blistering pace. What was cutting-edge a few years ago can quickly become obsolete. While ‘the range is decent,’ offering practical usability for many, the overall package lagged behind newer competitors. This emphasizes the challenge of early adoption in tech-driven segments; what seems innovative today can quickly be outpaced by superior, more refined offerings.
The context often highlights how SUVs, even EVs, can represent compromises. While the Kona EV avoided some of the fuel economy issues of ICE SUVs, its physical dimensions and ride quality still fell into common pitfalls. It’s not that the Kona EV was a bad car, but the relentless innovation in the EV space quickly exposed its shortcomings. ‘Newer EVs in the same price bracket—like the Bolt EUV or Tesla Model Y—offer more bang for your buck,’ providing a more polished, comfortable, and feature-rich experience. Ultimately, ‘it’s not a bad EV, but it’s not a great one either,’ making it a difficult recommendation in today’s highly competitive market for anyone looking for lasting value.
Car Model Information: 2024 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Premium
Name: Hyundai Kona
Caption: Hyundai Kona N Line (SX2)
Manufacturer: Hyundai Motor Company
Aka: Hyundai Kauai (Portugal)
Production: 2017–present
ModelYears: 2018–present
Class: Subcompact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: ubl
Categories: 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles in need of updating, All Wikipedia articles written in British English, Articles containing Chinese-language text
Summary: The Hyundai Kona (Korean: 현대 코나) is a subcompact crossover SUV produced by the South Korean manufacturer Hyundai. The first-generation Kona debuted in June 2017 and the production version was revealed later that year. It is positioned between the Venue or Bayon and the Tucson in Hyundai crossover SUV line-up. The battery electric version called the Kona Electric (or Kona EV) was first launched in South Korea during the first half of 2018 and rolled out gradually worldwide afterwards.
Get more information about: Hyundai Kona
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Hyundai Model: Kona EV
Price: $31,463 Mileage: 33,139 mi.
11. **Infiniti QX60 (2016-2020)**The Infiniti QX60, specifically models from 2016 to 2020, presents a classic conundrum in the luxury segment: the promise of opulence versus the reality of its underpinnings. ‘From the outside, the QX60 looks like a luxury SUV,’ boasting sleek lines, a commanding presence, and all the visual cues that suggest a premium experience. It aims to project sophistication and capability, aligning with the aspirations of buyers looking for comfort, space, and a touch of class. However, the true nature of the vehicle reveals itself not in its aesthetic, but in its driving dynamics and componentry.
Regrettably, ‘behind the wheel, it’s a dressed-up Pathfinder with a lackluster CVT and underwhelming handling.’ This is the kind of unfiltered truth that separates the wheat from the chaff in automotive reviews. While sharing platforms can be cost-effective, merely adding a luxury badge and some upgraded materials doesn’t magically transform a mainstream vehicle into a true premium offering. The Continuously Variable Transmission, often criticized for its uninspiring feel, contributes to a disconnected and unengaging driving experience. The ‘underwhelming handling’ means it floats rather than corners with confidence, doing little to inspire driver involvement or a sense of refined control that luxury buyers expect.
Adding to the disappointment, ‘the interior materials didn’t quite match the premium price,’ with some noticeable cost-cutting measures that betray its luxury aspirations. When you pay a premium, every touchpoint should exude quality, and the QX60 sometimes fell short here. Furthermore, ‘the tech was already behind the curve even when new,’ feeling outdated compared to rivals and failing to offer the cutting-edge connectivity and safety features expected in a luxury SUV. This obsolescence only intensified over its model run, leaving owners with an experience that felt increasingly behind the times.
This vehicle perfectly embodies the warning about high-end luxury SUVs that are ‘just too expensive’ when ‘lower-priced SUVs just as nice with similar features’ exist for ‘tens of thousands less,’ as Chris Pyle pointed out regarding luxury SUVs in general. The QX60 attempts to play in a league it’s not quite built for, trading on the illusion of luxury without delivering the substance. For savvy buyers, the choice is clear: ‘For the same money, you could be driving an Acura MDX or Lexus RX—both of which offer a far more rewarding experience.’ It’s a reminder that true luxury isn’t just about the badge or the exterior; it’s about the entire package, from driving dynamics to long-term satisfaction.
**The End of the Road for Underwhelming SUVs**
There you have it—eleven SUVs that, for all their marketing glitz and popular appeal, simply don’t pass the real-world test. From fundamental engineering flaws to outdated technology and questionable value propositions, these vehicles represent the pitfalls of a market that often prioritizes volume and perceived ruggedness over genuine driving pleasure, long-term reliability, and sensible design. We’ve seen how some models, under the guise of the ‘light truck exemption,’ manage to bypass crucial regulations, leading to less efficient and less safe vehicles that burden both your wallet and the environment.
It’s not enough for an SUV to merely exist; it needs to earn its place in your driveway. The sheer ubiquity of SUVs today, often chosen for a ‘psychological sense of security’ rather than actual need, masks the reality of their increased running costs, higher environmental impact, and often compromised driving dynamics compared to more thoughtfully designed passenger cars. We’ve highlighted vehicles with poor fuel economy, cramped interiors, bouncy rides, and electronics that seem to have a mind of their own—all factors that contribute to an ownership experience far from ideal.
Car Model Information: 2022 INFINITI QX60 Pure
Name: Infiniti QX60
Caption: 2017 Infiniti QX60 (L50)
Manufacturer: Nissan
Aka: Infiniti JX (2012–2013)
Production: February 2012 – August 2013 (JX35),September 2013 – present (QX60)
ModelYears: 2013 (JX35),2014–present (QX60)
Class: Executive car,crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Related: Nissan Pathfinder
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive,Front-engine, all-wheel-drive
Predecessor: Infiniti QX4
Categories: 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, All articles with bare URLs for citations, All articles with unsourced statements
Summary: The Infiniti QX60, called the Infiniti JX until the 2014 model year, is a mid-size luxury crossover SUV with three-row seating produced by Infiniti, the luxury vehicle division of Japanese automaker Nissan. It is underpinned by an elongated Nissan Murano platform also used by the Nissan Pathfinder.
In keeping with Infiniti’s naming scheme for 2014, in which cars begin with Q and SUVs begin with QX, the JX was renamed to QX60. While the number previously denoted engine displacement (for example, 35=3.5L engine), the new number, 60, is largely to do with its place in the product lineup, with larger numbers usually corresponding to more expensive vehicles.
Get more information about: Infiniti QX60
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Infiniti Model: QX60
Price: $33,900 Mileage: 45,057 mi.
As automotive enthusiasts who truly care about what you drive, our mission is to cut through the noise. We believe in vehicles that offer genuine value, a rewarding driving experience, and reliability that doesn’t keep you on a first-name basis with your mechanic. So, the next time you’re considering an SUV, remember this list. Do your homework, prioritize substance over style, and demand a vehicle that truly delivers on its promises, rather than one that merely fills a slot on the dealer lot. Because in a world full of choices, you truly deserve better than these underwhelming machines.
