When embarking on the significant journey of purchasing a new or used SUV, the pursuit of longevity and reliability often sits at the very top of a buyer’s priority list. We all envision a vehicle that can effortlessly tackle daily commutes, epic road trips, and the endless demands of hauling family and gear, confidently ticking past 100,000, 200,000, or even 250,000 miles without a hiccup. The allure of owning an SUV that maintains its driving composure and mechanical integrity deep into a six-digit mileage range is undeniably powerful, representing a smart investment and peace of mind.
However, the reality is that not all SUVs are created equal in their ability to withstand the test of time and mileage. While some models are engineered with robust components and a design philosophy focused on enduring performance, gracefully shrugging off years of use, others unfortunately begin to show significant signs of wear and tear surprisingly early. These vehicles can quickly transform from promising new additions to frustrating “money pits” that drain your finances through frequent, expensive repairs and a constant decline in overall driving satisfaction.
In this comprehensive guide, we delve into the SUVs that, according to expert analysis and common owner experiences, are prone to losing their luster and reliability well before the 100,000-mile mark. Our aim is to empower you with objective, fact-based information, allowing you to make truly informed purchasing decisions and avoid potential pitfalls. We’ll explore seven models notorious for premature aging, highlighting the specific issues that often arise and explaining why they frequently feel “done” by 80,000 miles or even sooner.
1. **Jeep Compass (2007–2017, 1st Generation)**The first-generation Jeep Compass, produced from 2007 to 2017, represented Chrysler’s attempt to carve out a niche in the compact crossover market. Despite bearing the iconic Jeep badge, which typically signifies ruggedness and durability, this particular model unfortunately delivered little of the brand’s expected resilience. By the time these SUVs reached the 80,000-mile mark, a significant number of owners reported that their vehicles felt considerably older and more worn out than their odometers suggested.
This premature aging was often attributed to a combination of factors, including persistent suspension creaks, an interior prone to rattling, and a drivetrain that felt sluggish and unrefined. These issues, alongside a growing list of mechanical problems, converged to establish the first-generation Compass as one of the most notably prematurely worn-out SUVs available on the road. The initial promise of a compact, versatile Jeep often dissolved into a frustrating ownership experience, leaving many drivers disappointed with its long-term reliability and build quality.
Built on a modified Dodge Caliber platform, the Compass relied on components that, regrettably, proved to be insufficient for sustained long-term use. While the 2.0L and 2.4L World Engines provided adequate power in their prime, they gained a reputation for oil consumption issues and less-than-ideal noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) levels as they aged. However, the most significant mechanical flaw often cited was the continuously variable transmission (CVT), which became infamous for its rough performance, tendencies to overheat, and outright failures, frequently occurring well before the 100,000-mile mark. Although Jeep later transitioned to a conventional automatic transmission in subsequent models, the reputation for CVT troubles had already severely impacted this generation.
Beyond the drivetrain, the interior durability of the Jeep Compass also emerged as a notable weak point over time. Owners frequently reported issues such as plastic panels warping, buttons becoming sticky, and headliners sagging, all much earlier than one would expect from a modern vehicle. Furthermore, suspension components, particularly the control arms and bushings, tended to wear out prematurely, directly contributing to the loose and clunky driving sensation that many owners consistently reported. These issues collectively underscored a vehicle that, despite its potential, simply was not built for the long haul.
For prospective buyers exploring the used market, the first-generation Jeep Compass serves as a stark reminder that appearances can be deceiving. While a unit might look acceptable on a used car lot, its underlying mechanical and structural integrity can be severely compromised. It’s a prime example of an SUV that, even with average mileage, can drive and require repairs as if it’s already well past its prime. Caution is strongly advised if you’re considering this model for long-term ownership.
Car Model Information: 2024 Jeep Compass Latitude
Name: Jeep Compass
Caption: 2019 Jeep Compass
Manufacturer: Jeep
Production: 2006–present
ModelYears: 2007–present
Class: Compact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout
Chassis: Unibody
Categories: 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Articles with short description
Summary: The Jeep Compass is a compact crossover SUV, introduced in 2006 for the 2007 model year. The first generation Compass and Patriot, its rebadged variant, were among Jeep’s first crossover SUVs. The second-generation Compass debuted in September 2016 in Brazil and at the Los Angeles International Auto Show in November 2016, sharing a modified platform with the Renegade. It is positioned between the smaller Renegade and the larger Cherokee globally or the Commander in South America. The third-generation Compass debuted in May 2025, built on the STLA Medium by Stellantis, shared with other PSA Groupe vehicles.
Get more information about: Jeep Compass
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Jeep Model: Compass
Price: $19,861 Mileage: 53,954 mi.
Read more about: Buyer’s Remorse in Every Mile: 12 Cars Drivers Say They’d “Unbuy” If They Could
2. **Ford Explorer (2011–2015, 5th Generation Early Models)**The 2011–2015 Ford Explorer represented a significant and ambitious transformation for the venerable model line, shifting from its traditional rugged body-on-frame SUV heritage to a more modern, family-oriented unibody crossover design. This redesign was initially lauded for bringing enhanced road manners, a more refined driving experience, and a contemporary aesthetic to the popular SUV. However, this pivotal generational change, particularly in its early iterations, inadvertently introduced a range of mechanical and quality control problems that would significantly impact owner satisfaction.
Unfortunately, many of these early 5th-generation Explorers began to exhibit pronounced signs of wear and tear remarkably early, often by the time they reached 80,000 miles. A litany of issues encompassing the drivetrain, suspension, and interior quality started to surface, adversely affecting both the vehicle’s drivability and the overall ownership experience. What promised to be a seamless transition into a new era for the Explorer instead became a source of mounting concern for many who had invested in these models.
One of the most persistent and troubling aspects identified in these models was the performance of the 3.5L V6 engine when paired with Ford’s 6-speed automatic transmission. While the powertrain appeared robust and capable on paper, real-world reliability proved to be inconsistent. Common complaints included transmission shudder, noticeably delayed shifting, and, in some unfortunate cases, outright transmission failures, often surfacing just as the vehicle’s factory warranty expired. Furthermore, some models were equipped with a 2.0L EcoBoost turbocharged four-cylinder engine, which presented its own set of challenges, including oil leaks, issues with carbon buildup, and generally lackluster performance when under heavy load.
The Explorer’s interior, despite its stylish and modern appearance when new, also struggled with long-term durability. Owners frequently reported various issues that contributed to a premature sense of aging, such as dashboard rattles, persistent squeaks, and screens on the infotainment systems (particularly the MyFord Touch systems) that would fade or malfunction. Additionally, premature seat wear was a common complaint, detracting from the cabin’s initial premium feel. Beyond the interior, critical components like the power steering system were prone to failures, and various suspension components, including control arms and sway bar links, would wear out prematurely, further degrading the vehicle’s once-smooth ride quality.
Considering these widespread issues, the 2011–2015 Ford Explorer serves as a classic cautionary tale of a vehicle that may present beautifully when new but rapidly becomes fatigued and problematic far too soon. While Ford did implement improvements in later model years, these early 5th-generation versions frequently began to feel loose, unrefined, and in urgent need of costly attention by the 80,000-mile mark. For a vehicle positioned as a reliable and capable family hauler, this pattern of early degradation represents a significant red flag for prospective buyers focused on long-term ownership value.
Car Model Information: 2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Name: Ford Explorer
Caption: Sixth-generation Ford Explorer
Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company
Production: 1990–present
ModelYears: 1991–present
Class: unbulleted list
Chassis: unbulleted list
Predecessor: Ford Bronco II
Successor: Ford Territory (Australia)
Categories: 2000s cars, 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles in need of updating
Summary: The Ford Explorer is a range of SUVs manufactured by the Ford Motor Company since the 1991 model year. The first five-door SUV produced by Ford, the Explorer, was introduced as a replacement for the three-door Bronco II. As with the Ford Ranger, the model line derives its name from a trim package previously offered on Ford F-Series pickup trucks. As of 2020, the Explorer became the best-selling SUV in the American market.
Currently in its sixth generation, the Explorer has featured a five-door wagon body style since its 1991 introduction. During the first two generations, the model line included a three-door wagon (directly replacing the Bronco II). The Ford Explorer Sport Trac is a crew-cab mid-size pickup derived from the second-generation Explorer. The fifth and sixth generations of the Explorer have been produced as the Ford Police Interceptor Utility (replacing both the Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor and the Ford Police Interceptor Sedan).
The Explorer is slotted between the Ford Edge and Ford Expedition within North America’s current Ford SUV range. The model line has undergone rebadging several times, with Mazda, Mercury, and Lincoln each selling derivative variants. Currently, Lincoln markets a luxury version of the Explorer as the Lincoln Aviator.
For the North American market, the first four generations of the Explorer were produced by Ford at its Louisville Assembly Plant (Louisville, Kentucky) and its now-closed St. Louis Assembly Plant (Hazelwood, Missouri). Ford currently assembles the Explorer alongside the Lincoln Aviator and the Police Interceptor Utility at its Chicago Assembly Plant (Chicago, Illinois).
Get more information about: Ford Explorer
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Ford Model: Explorer
Price: $33,399 Mileage: 35,792 mi.
Read more about: 12 SUVs to Steer Clear Of: Critical Insights into Models That Age Poorly and Rack Up Repair Bills
3. **GMC Terrain (2010–2017, 1st Generation with 2.4L Engine)**The first-generation GMC Terrain, especially those equipped with the 2.4L inline-four engine, stands out as a prime illustration of an SUV that succumbs to premature aging, often showing significant signs of wear and mechanical distress well before it reaches the 80,000-mile mark. Upon its debut, the Terrain garnered attention for its distinctive, bold styling and a smooth, car-like ride that promised comfort and modern functionality. However, this initial appeal quickly diminished as the vehicle gained an unfortunate reputation for incurring costly mechanical issues and experiencing a noticeable, rapid decline in overall refinement as the mileage accumulated.
At the very core of the Terrain’s chronic problems was the 2.4L Ecotec engine, a powertrain that became notoriously known for its excessive oil consumption. This issue wasn’t merely an inconvenience; many owners frequently reported the necessity of topping off their engine oil every 1,000 to 1,500 miles. Neglecting this crucial task could lead to severe consequences, including dangerously low oil pressure, irreversible timing chain damage, and ultimately, catastrophic engine failure. Despite GMC issuing multiple technical service bulletins and extending warranties to address these widespread issues, the fundamental problem remained unresolved for a considerable number of affected vehicles, leaving owners in a precarious position.
Adding to the mechanical woes, the 6-speed automatic transmission in the first-generation Terrain also proved to be a significant weak point. Reports of harsh downshifting, noticeable slipping, and premature failures were far from uncommon, particularly in vehicles that had been subjected to frequent stop-and-go traffic or light towing duties. These transmission troubles further exacerbated the vehicle’s overall lack of long-term reliability, contributing to an increasingly frustrating driving experience as the SUV aged. Such issues often necessitated expensive and complex repairs, significantly adding to the total cost of ownership.
Beyond the major powertrain concerns, suspension components, including the struts, control arms, and various bushings, also tended to wear out prematurely. This early degradation of critical suspension parts directly contributed to a floaty and disconnected ride quality, eroding the comfortable and composed feel that the Terrain offered when new. The once-smooth handling gradually deteriorated into a less predictable and more jarring experience, further reinforcing the perception of the vehicle aging rapidly and poorly.
Interior quality also suffered considerably as the mileage on the Terrain increased. While the cabin initially featured soft-touch surfaces and a contemporary design, many owners eventually reported a litany of issues. These included persistent rattles and squeaks, peeling trim pieces that compromised the aesthetic appeal, failing infotainment systems, and power accessories such as window regulators and seat motors ceasing to function far too early. These internal degradations collectively created a sense of a vehicle that was simply not built to last. The GMC Terrain, therefore, stands as a prime example of an SUV that promises comfort and practicality but often delivers frustration and unexpected repair bills long before it reaches the 100,000-mile mark, making it a notably poor long-term investment.
Car Model Information: 2024 GMC Terrain SLT
Name: GMC Terrain
Manufacturer: General Motors
Production: August 2009 – present
ModelYears: 2010–present
Class: Mid-size crossover SUV
Layout: Transverse engine,Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout
Predecessor: GMC Envoy,Pontiac Torrent,Opel Antara
BodyStyle: SUV
Categories: 2010s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Articles with short description, Cars introduced in 2009
Summary: The GMC Terrain is a crossover SUV by American manufacturer General Motors under its GMC marque. Sharing its platform with the Chevrolet Equinox, the first-generation Terrain was built on GM’s Theta platform, while subsequent generations are built on the Delta platform. The Terrain is the smallest GMC vehicle, slotted below the Acadia. It also indirectly replaced the Pontiac Torrent which was typically sold via the same dealers prior to General Motors dropping the Pontiac brand.
Get more information about: GMC Terrain
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: GMC Model: Terrain
Price: $23,998 Mileage: 29,818 mi.
Read more about: 12 SUVs to Steer Clear Of: Critical Insights into Models That Age Poorly and Rack Up Repair Bills
4. **Dodge Journey (2009–2020)**The Dodge Journey has earned its place as one of the most frequently criticized midsize SUVs in recent automotive memory, and for a multitude of compelling reasons. Despite its remarkably long production run, spanning from 2009 all the way to 2020, the Journey remained largely unchanged for over a decade. This lack of significant updates meant that many units of the Journey began to exhibit pronounced signs of wear and tear, and a noticeable decline in performance, well before the 80,000-mile mark.
While its initial low purchase price and the appealing availability of a third-row seating option might have drawn in budget-conscious families, the long-term ownership experience of the Dodge Journey frequently transformed into a source of considerable frustration. Owners often found themselves grappling with numerous issues and unexpected expenses, long before the odometer had even approached the six-figure milestone. The promise of an affordable, spacious family vehicle often gave way to the reality of a mechanically tired and maintenance-intensive one.
Early models of the Journey were particularly hampered by an underpowered 2.4L four-cylinder engine, which was paired with an outdated 4-speed automatic transmission. This combination not only delivered sluggish performance, making highway merging and acceleration a chore, but also proved to be inherently unreliable over time. Even the supposedly more potent 3.6L V6 versions, when paired with a 6-speed automatic transmission, frequently suffered from rough shifting and premature transmission issues. In both engine and transmission configurations, the drivetrain components tended to age quickly, directly contributing to a ride that felt increasingly rough, noisy, and unrefined as the vehicle accumulated miles.
Beyond the significant mechanical concerns surrounding its powertrain, the Journey’s suspension system stood out as another notable weak point. Components such as control arm bushings, sway bar links, and struts were prone to frequent and early wear, leading to audible clunks, persistent squeaks, and an unsettlingly floaty sensation at highway speeds. This degradation of the suspension severely compromised the vehicle’s handling and ride comfort, further contributing to the overall impression of a rapidly aging vehicle. The continuous need for suspension repairs added yet another layer of financial burden to owners.
Furthermore, the interior of the Dodge Journey, despite offering generous space, did not fare much better in terms of long-term durability. Owners frequently reported issues with cheap plastics that scratched easily, failing touchscreen infotainment systems, broken climate controls, and trim pieces that peeled away, detracting significantly from the cabin’s aesthetics. These pervasive internal issues collectively contributed to the distinct impression that the vehicle had aged years faster than its actual mileage suggested. The Dodge Journey, in essence, is the epitome of a vehicle that simply does not age well. While a few diligent drivers might push their Journeys to high mileage through meticulous maintenance, the average unit by 80,000 miles typically feels dated, noisy, and mechanically exhausted. For buyers prioritizing long-term value and reliability, it is a model that should be approached with extreme caution, or perhaps, entirely avoided.
Car Model Information: 2018 Dodge Journey SE
Name: Dodge Journey
Caption: 2012 Dodge Journey
Manufacturer: Dodge
Aka: Fiat Freemont,Dodge JC (Japan),Dodge JCUV (China)
Production: 2008–2020
ModelYears: 2009–2020,2011–2015 (Freemont)
Assembly: Toluca, Mexico
Designer: Ryan Nagode
Class: Mid-size crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Platform: Mitsubishi GS platform
Related: Chrysler 200,Chrysler Sebring,Dodge Avenger
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout
Engine: ubl
Transmission: Ultradrive#40TES/41TES
Wheelbase: 2890 mm
Abbr: on
Order: flip
Length: 192.4 in
Width: 72.2 in
Height: 66.6 in
Weight: 3818 lb
Predecessor: Fiat Ulysse,Fiat Croma
Successor: Dodge Journey (2021)
Categories: 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All articles with dead external links, All articles with unsourced statements
Summary: The Dodge Journey is a mid-size crossover SUV manufactured and marketed by Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ Dodge brand for model years 2009 to 2020 over a single generation, with a facelift for the 2011 model year. The Journey was styled by Ryan Nagode, and was marketed globally in both left- and right-hand drive, including as the Fiat Freemont.
Internally identified as the JC49, the Journey shares FCA’s global D-segment platform with the Dodge Avenger and a nearly identical wheelbase to the outgoing short-wheelbase (SWB) Dodge Caravan.
Having debuted at the 2007 Frankfurt Motor Show, the Journey subsequently appeared at the 2009 Frankfurt Motor Show. All models were manufactured in Mexico at FCA’s Toluca Assembly facility, with just over 1.1 million manufactured before production ended in 2020.
Get more information about: Dodge Journey
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Dodge Model: Journey
Price: $9,950 Mileage: 98,236 mi.
Read more about: Buyer Beware: 10 SUVs That Won’t Make it to 100,000 Miles Without Costly Repairs
5. **Nissan Pathfinder (2013–2016, 4th Generation Early CVT Models)**The 2013–2016 Nissan Pathfinder marked a profound departure for a nameplate that had historically been associated with rugged, truck-based SUV capabilities. This particular generation represented a significant pivot towards a unibody crossover design, consciously aimed at prioritizing family comfort and on-road refinement. While this strategic shift held considerable promise for a broader market appeal, it unfortunately came burdened with one major, overarching flaw: the widespread introduction of Nissan’s notoriously problematic continuously variable transmission (CVT). This singular component issue quickly overshadowed any initial positive attributes the vehicle offered.
By the time these Pathfinders, particularly from this specific generation, reached the 80,000-mile mark, many examples felt anything but fresh or reliable. Owners frequently reported a spectrum of issues ranging from noticeable drivability problems and a pervasive sense of drivetrain fatigue to the daunting prospect of mounting repair costs. The initial appeal of a spacious, comfortable family crossover quickly evaporated in the face of these persistent mechanical shortcomings, leading to widespread dissatisfaction among those who had invested in this model.
At the heart of the Pathfinder’s reliability struggles during this period was, without a doubt, the CVT. While the 3.5L V6 engine itself was generally considered solid and dependable, its pairing with a transmission prone to premature wear, persistent overheating, noticeable shuddering, and even total failure proved to be a critical misstep. These issues became so widespread and well-documented that Nissan faced multiple class-action lawsuits and, in response, was compelled to extend warranties for many of these CVTs. However, a significant number of vehicles on the used market today have since fallen outside those extended coverage windows, leaving current owners vulnerable to incredibly costly repairs. The unreliable CVT system inherently made the Pathfinder feel sluggish, strained, and significantly older than its actual mileage suggested.
Beyond the pervasive transmission concerns, early suspension wear emerged as another significant sore point for this generation of the Pathfinder. Components such as control arms, sway bar links, and various rear bushings frequently degraded prematurely, contributing directly to a bouncy and unsettling ride quality. This deterioration of the suspension system, when combined with the declining performance of the problematic transmission, caused the Pathfinder to feel distinctly loose and tired well before it reached the 80,000-mile milestone. The vehicle’s once-composed ride quickly gave way to a less refined and more jarring experience, further undermining its value proposition.
Interior quality, regrettably, did not provide much redemption for the 2013–2016 Pathfinder. Reports indicated that buttons tended to wear quickly, the infotainment system frequently malfunctioned, and various trim materials lost their original finish prematurely. For families who were specifically seeking a refined, reliable, and comfortable long-haul SUV, the Pathfinder’s rapid aging and persistent mechanical troubles proved to be a considerable disappointment. This generation of the Nissan Pathfinder stands as a textbook example of how good intentions and a desirable concept can be severely undermined by critical execution flaws, causing a vehicle to feel outdated and overworked far too soon in its lifecycle.
Car Model Information: 2023 Nissan Pathfinder Platinum
Name: Nissan Pathfinder
Caption: 2022 Nissan Pathfinder Platinum 4WD (R53, US)
Manufacturer: Nissan
Production: 1985–present
ModelYears: unbulleted list
Layout: unbulleted list
Class: unbulleted list
Chassis: unbulleted list
Predecessor: unbulleted list
Successor: unbulleted list
Categories: 1990s cars, 2000s cars, 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles
Summary: The Nissan Pathfinder is a range of sport utility vehicles manufactured by Nissan since 1985. Until the third-generation model, the Pathfinder is based on Nissan’s compact pickup truck platform which it shares with the Navara/Frontier. The Pathfinder was marketed as the Nissan Terrano outside North America. Beginning in 2004, the vehicles were marketed globally as the Pathfinder. In 2012, the R52 series Pathfinder was released as a three-row crossover SUV based on the unibody Nissan D platform, moving away from the body-on-frame chassis format. The role of a mid-size body-on-frame SUV in Nissan’s global lineup was passed to the Terra/X-Terra, which was released in 2018 and based on the D23 series Navara.
Get more information about: Nissan Pathfinder
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Nissan Model: Pathfinder
Price: $36,988 Mileage: 46,270 mi.
Read more about: 12 SUVs to Steer Clear Of: Critical Insights into Models That Age Poorly and Rack Up Repair Bills
6. **Nissan Armada (Dated Powertrain, Poor Fuel Economy)**The 2024 Nissan Armada presents itself with the outward appearance of a highly capable and robust full-size SUV, largely due to its formidable 400-horsepower V8 engine. However, a closer examination reveals that this powerful powertrain, despite its impressive output, paradoxically proves to be one of its most significant drawbacks. The core issue lies in the dated engine technology, which, while offering plenty of grunt, results in truly abysmal fuel economy figures. In an era where gas prices are increasingly volatile and environmental considerations are paramount, the Armada’s thirst for fuel makes it an exceptionally expensive vehicle to operate on an ongoing basis.
Beyond its fuel efficiency woes, the interior of the Nissan Armada, while offering a sense of initial spaciousness, struggles considerably with both poor space utilization and noticeably dated design elements. Compared to its modern competitors, the Armada’s infotainment system feels particularly antiquated, lacking the intuitive interfaces, swift responsiveness, and advanced features that have become standard expectations in its price range. This technological lag significantly detracts from the user experience, making the cabin feel less contemporary and less connected.
Moreover, the Armada is plagued by several practical challenges that hinder its utility as a truly versatile family vehicle. The high load floor, for instance, creates considerable difficulties when it comes to loading cargo, making everyday tasks like grocery runs or packing for a trip more cumbersome than they should be. Furthermore, the third-row seating, despite its presence, is often described as cramped and largely unsuitable for adult passengers, severely limiting its effectiveness as a genuine eight-passenger vehicle. These inherent limitations, compounded by the SUV’s massive and unwieldy size and its generally poor maneuverability, collectively make it increasingly difficult to justify the Armada’s premium price point in a highly competitive segment.
In essence, while the Nissan Armada projects an image of capability and luxury, its dated V8 engine and associated poor fuel economy, combined with an outdated interior and significant practical design flaws, render it a questionable value proposition. For buyers seeking a modern, efficient, and user-friendly full-size SUV, the Armada’s considerable drawbacks make it a difficult choice to recommend, as its long-term operational costs and daily usability are significantly compromised.
7. **Ford Expedition (Reliability Issues, High Ownership Costs)**The Ford Expedition, a long-standing fixture in the full-size SUV segment, has cultivated a reputation as a highly capable and family-friendly vehicle, cherished for its immense space and towing prowess. However, this established reputation is unfortunately severely undermined by a concerning pattern of reliability issues and what can only be described as astronomical ownership costs. These factors compel potential buyers to seriously reconsider its long-term value, as the initial appeal often gives way to a financially burdensome reality.
Among the most critical concerns plaguing many units of the Ford Expedition are widespread transmission problems. These issues are far from minor, frequently leading to daunting repair bills that can easily exceed $6,200. Such a significant expense represents a major financial hit that prospective owners must factor into their budget, as it can quickly erode any perceived savings from the purchase price. The unpredictability of these costly transmission failures creates considerable anxiety and undermines confidence in the vehicle’s long-term mechanical integrity.
Beyond these critical mechanical issues, the Expedition has also faced quality concerns related to its innovative aluminum body panels. While designed to reduce weight and improve fuel efficiency, these panels have been associated with widespread reports of paint peeling and bubbling. This aesthetic degradation not only detracts from the vehicle’s appearance but also raises questions about the overall build quality and the longevity of its exterior finishes. Such issues are particularly frustrating for owners who expect premium quality from a full-size SUV.
Furthermore, the fundamental design of the Expedition, despite its undeniable interior space, struggles considerably when it comes to its practical application as a daily driver. Its massive size, while providing ample room for passengers and cargo, is inherently less suited for navigating the often-cramped parking conditions and denser traffic found in urban centers. This lack of maneuverability can make routine errands and city driving a constant challenge. When factoring in the high initial purchase price, substantial depreciation rates, and the aforementioned significant maintenance costs, the Ford Expedition emerges as a questionable value proposition for the majority of families who are seeking a truly reliable and cost-effective transportation solution for the long haul. Its blend of high initial outlay and persistent ongoing expenses demands careful consideration from any prudent buyer.
The first half of our exposé unveiled a series of SUVs that disappointingly falter far too early in their lifecycles, proving themselves to be more of a financial burden than a reliable companion. Now, we turn our attention to the second cohort of vehicles that, despite their initial appeal or brand prestige, also frequently lead owners down a path of dissatisfaction due to exorbitant long-term costs, persistent design flaws, and a general decline in owner satisfaction. These are the models that, for a variety of critical reasons, merit a careful and often cautious approach from any prospective buyer focused on long-term value and peace of mind.
Understanding the full scope of SUV ownership means looking beyond the showroom shine and initial price tag. It involves scrutinizing everything from depreciation and insurance to fuel efficiency and the often-hidden costs of repairs that quickly accumulate. Our goal remains to arm you with objective, fact-based insights, ensuring that your next SUV purchase is a well-considered investment rather than a potential “money pit.”
Car Model Information: 2019 Ford Expedition Max Limited
Name: Ford Expedition
Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company
Production: 1996–present
ModelYears: 1997–present
Class: Full-size car,Sport utility vehicle
Related: Lincoln Navigator
BodyStyle: Sport utility vehicle
Layout: Front-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout,Front-engine, four-wheel-drive layout
Chassis: Body-on-frame
Predecessor: Ford Bronco,Ford Excursion
Categories: 2000s cars, 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in American English
Summary: The Ford Expedition is a full-size SUV produced by Ford Motor Company since the 1997 model year. The successor to the Ford Bronco, the Expedition shifted its form factor from an off-road oriented vehicle to a truck-based station wagon. Initially competing against the Chevrolet Tahoe, the Expedition also competes against the Toyota Sequoia, Nissan Armada, and the Jeep Wagoneer.
First used for a 1992 F-150 concept vehicle, Ford first marketed the Expedition nameplate for 1995 on a trim level package for the two-door Ford Explorer Sport. As with its Bronco predecessor, the Expedition is heavily derives its chassis from the Ford F-150, differing primarily in suspension configuration. All five generations of the Expedition have served as the basis of the Lincoln Navigator–the first full-size luxury SUV. The model line is produced in two wheelbases (an extended-wheelbase variant introduced was introduced for 2007, largely replacing the Ford Excursion), with seating for up to eight passengers.
Ford currently assembles the Expedition at its Kentucky Truck Assembly facility (Louisville, Kentucky) alongside the Lincoln Navigator and Super Duty trucks. Prior to 2009, the model line was assembled by the Michigan Assembly Plant (Wayne, Michigan).
Get more information about: Ford Expedition
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Ford Model: Expedition
Price: $28,885 Mileage: 82,142 mi.
8. **GMC Yukon XL**The GMC Yukon XL positions itself as a premium, luxurious full-size SUV, often appealing to buyers seeking impressive space and capability. However, its sophisticated aspirations are severely compromised by an astonishing total cost of ownership, which is projected to reach an eye-watering $92,343 over a mere five years. This significant financial outlay quickly diminishes the vehicle’s appeal, turning what seems like a grand investment into a substantial long-term expense.
A large portion of this cost is attributed to a massive depreciation of $45,316, meaning the vehicle loses nearly half its value in just five years. This rapid value erosion, coupled with substantial insurance costs amounting to $12,555 and significant fuel expenses totaling $16,229, paints a clear picture of a vehicle that demands a continuous financial commitment. While its maintenance costs are not the absolute highest in its segment, at $2,885, they certainly contribute to the overall burden.
The Yukon XL’s fuel efficiency ratings are particularly problematic in today’s evolving automotive landscape, achieving only 16-17 MPG combined. This poor efficiency not only inflates running costs dramatically but also restricts the vehicle’s practical range, necessitating more frequent and often costly fuel stops. While the Yukon XL undeniably provides impressive interior space and substantial capability, these advantages come with a hefty price tag that is increasingly challenging to justify in a market offering more efficient and cost-effective alternatives.
Car Model Information: 2022 RAM 1500 TRX
Name: Chevrolet Suburban,GMC Yukon XL
Caption: 2015 Chevrolet Suburban 1500 LTZ
Manufacturer: General Motors
Aka: Chevrolet Veraneio (Brazil, 1964–1995),GMC Carryall (1960–1972),GMC Suburban (1937–1999),GMC Yukon XL (from 2000),Holden Suburban (Australia/New Zealand, 1998–2001)
Production: 1934–present
Class: Full-size,station wagon
Layout: Front-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout,rear-wheel drive
Related: ubl
Categories: 1940s cars, 1950s cars, 1960s cars, 1970s cars, 1980s cars
Summary: The Chevrolet Suburban is a series of SUVs built by Chevrolet. The longest-produced automobile nameplate in the world, the Suburban has been made since 1934, and is currently in its twelfth generation (2021–present). Beginning life as one of the first metal-bodied station wagons, the Suburban is the progenitor of the modern full-size sport utility vehicle, combining a wagon-style body with the chassis and powertrain of a pickup truck. Alongside its Advance Design, Task Force, and C/K predecessors, the Chevrolet Silverado currently shares chassis and mechanical commonality with the Suburban and other trucks.
Traditionally one of the most profitable vehicles sold by General Motors, the Suburban has been marketed through both Chevrolet and GMC for nearly its entire production. Along sharing the Suburban name with Chevrolet, GMC has used several nameplates for the model line; since 2000, the division has marketed it as the GMC Yukon XL, while since 2003 Cadillac has marketed the Suburban as the Cadillac Escalade ESV. During the 1990s, GM Australia marketed right-hand drive Suburbans under the Holden brand.
The Suburban is sold in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Central America, Chile, Dominican Republic, Bolivia, Peru, Philippines, and the Middle East (except Israel), while the Yukon XL is sold only in North America (exclusive to the United States, Canada, and Mexico) and the Middle East territories (except Israel).
A 2018 iSeeCars.com study identified the Chevrolet Suburban as the car that is driven the most each year. A 2019 iSeeCars.com study named the Chevrolet Suburban the second-ranked longest-lasting vehicle. In December 2019, the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce unveiled a Hollywood Walk of Fame star for the Suburban, noting that the Suburban had been in “1,750 films and TV shows since 1952.”
Get more information about: Chevrolet Suburban
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: GMC Model: Yukon XL
Price: $75,887 Mileage: 27,561 mi.
Read more about: Ranks 20 SUVs Most Likely to Last Nearly 250,000 Miles
9. **Jeep Grand Cherokee**The Jeep Grand Cherokee has long been celebrated for its distinctive styling and commendable off-road prowess. Yet, this reputation is unfortunately overshadowed by its concerning total cost of ownership, which climbs to $70,241 over a five-year period. This substantial figure raises serious questions about the vehicle’s long-term value proposition in an increasingly competitive SUV market.
This considerable ownership cost includes a depreciation of $28,727, significant insurance expenses totaling $11,425, and high fuel costs amounting to $17,023. Additionally, an average of $9,652 in interest payments further adds to the financial strain. For the 2024 model year, the Grand Cherokee also introduced a substantial base price increase of $8,925, and previously standard features like Quadra-trac II now require separate investment.
Reliability issues also plague the Grand Cherokee, with common problems frequently reported by owners. These include erratic electronic shifting, instances of engine stalling, premature alternator failures, and problematic ignition switch malfunctions. Despite an interior that may appear upscale in marketing visuals, the actual materials and build quality often fall short, and excessive road noise detracts from any aspirations of a refined driving experience.
Car Model Information: 2022 RAM 1500 TRX
Name: Jeep Grand Cherokee
Manufacturer: Jeep
Production: 1992–present
ModelYears: 1993–present
Class: unbulleted list
BodyStyle: sport utility vehicle
Layout: unbulleted list
Chassis: Vehicle_frame#Uniframe
Categories: 2000s cars, 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in American English
Summary: The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a range of mid-sized sport utility vehicles produced by American manufacturer Jeep. At its introduction, while most SUVs were still manufactured with body-on-frame construction, the Grand Cherokee has used a unibody chassis from the start.
Get more information about: Jeep Grand Cherokee
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Jeep Model: Grand Cherokee
Price: $75,887 Mileage: 27,561 mi.
Read more about: Buyer Beware: These 12 Crossovers Turn into Money Pits Past 80,000 Miles
10. **Hyundai Kona EV**The 2024 Hyundai Kona EV enters the burgeoning electric vehicle market with a competitive price point, aiming to attract eco-conscious urban drivers. However, despite its modern powertrain, this model grapples with several significant practical limitations that can hinder its appeal and overall owner satisfaction, becoming increasingly noticeable in daily driving scenarios.
One of the most persistent issues reported is the considerable road noise penetration into the cabin, coupled with surprising levels of wind noise at highway speeds. This lack of sound insulation detracts significantly from the otherwise quiet electric driving experience. The suspension tuning is also a notable concern, often exhibiting a tendency to bounce excessively over pavement undulations, and its overall handling characteristics are less refined than expected.
Moreover, real-world efficiency figures often fall short of the EPA’s official estimates, achieving only 25 mpg equivalent during testing, lower than its rated figures. This discrepancy means drivers may experience less range than anticipated. Lastly, design choices have compromised interior space utilization, limiting both passenger and cargo capacity, making it less practical for those who need more versatility.
Car Model Information: 2022 RAM 1500 TRX
Name: Hyundai Kona
Caption: Hyundai Kona N Line (SX2)
Manufacturer: Hyundai Motor Company
Aka: Hyundai Kauai (Portugal)
Production: 2017–present
ModelYears: 2018–present
Class: Subcompact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: ubl
Categories: 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles in need of updating, All Wikipedia articles written in British English, Articles containing Chinese-language text
Summary: The Hyundai Kona is a subcompact crossover SUV produced by the South Korean manufacturer Hyundai. The first-generation Kona debuted in June 2017 and the production version was revealed later that year. It is positioned between the Venue or Bayon and the Tucson in Hyundai crossover SUV line-up. The battery electric version called the Kona Electric (or Kona EV) was first launched in South Korea during the first half of 2018 and rolled out gradually worldwide afterwards.
Get more information about: Hyundai Kona
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Hyundai Model: Kona EV
Price: $75,887 Mileage: 27,561 mi.
Read more about: Accident-Proof Rides: Unveiling 14 Cars Secretly Engineered to Transform Even the Most Terrible Drivers into Confident Road Warriors
11. **Buick Enclave**The Buick Enclave attempts to carve out a niche in the premium SUV segment, offering a spacious interior and a comfortable ride. However, its efforts are hampered by several significant shortcomings that collectively undermine its value proposition and make its premium pricing difficult to justify for discerning buyers.
Starting with a base MSRP of $43,900 for the 2024 model, the Enclave unfortunately restricts many advanced safety features, increasingly expected as standard in this price range, to higher trim levels. This forces buyers to incur additional expenses for a fully equipped vehicle, inflating the actual cost well beyond the initial advertised price.
Upon closer inspection, the interior materials and overall build quality of the Enclave often fail to genuinely distinguish themselves from non-luxury competitors. This lack of a clear premium feel makes it challenging to rationalize the higher price point. Furthermore, the vehicle’s fuel efficiency regrettably lags behind other V6-powered competitors in its class, contributing to a higher long-term cost of ownership through increased fuel expenses and overshadowing its comfortable seating and adequate cargo space.
Read more about: The 12 Best-Rated Family Crossovers: Spacious 7-Seaters That Deliver on Fuel Economy
12. **MINI Countryman**The MINI Countryman capitalizes on its distinctive styling and iconic brand heritage, attracting buyers looking for a compact SUV with character. However, beneath its charming exterior lie fundamental design flaws that significantly impact its daily usability and overall comfort, especially during extended periods of driving.
One of the most immediate issues is the compromised driving position, stemming from an offset steering wheel and limited reach adjustment. Compounding this, the head restraints often force occupants into an uncomfortable forward-leaning posture. These ergonomic challenges become increasingly apparent and fatiguing during longer journeys, detracting from the vehicle’s appeal as a practical daily driver.
The interior quality is another area where the Countryman struggles to meet expectations, particularly considering its premium pricing. The cabin features a noticeable abundance of hard plastics that feel out of place in a vehicle marketed with a luxury-adjacent image. Adding to its practical limitations, the Countryman suffers from a high load lip, which unnecessarily complicates cargo loading, and overall space utilization within the cabin is also poor for its segment.
Car Model Information: 2025 MINI Countryman S
Name: MINI Countryman
Caption: 2018 Mini Countryman Cooper S (pre-facelift)
Manufacturer: BMW
Aka: Mini Crossover (Japan, until 2024)
Production: 2010–present
Class: Subcompact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive
Categories: 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in British English, All articles needing additional references, Articles needing additional references from May 2023
Summary: The Mini Countryman, also called Mini Crossover in Japan until 2024, is a subcompact crossover SUV, the first vehicle of this type to be launched by BMW under the Mini marque. It was launched in 2010 and received a facelift in 2014. The second generation vehicle was released in 2017 and received a facelift in 2020. The third generation of the Countryman was released in 2023.
Get more information about: Mini Countryman
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: MINI Model: Countryman
Price: $33,987 Mileage: 14,629 mi.
Read more about: Parking Showdown: 5 Urban Heroes That Forgive All Mistakes and 5 Challenging Cars That Lead to Parking Disasters
13. **Buick Envision**The Buick Envision presents itself as a contender in the premium compact SUV segment, but it struggles with surprisingly mediocre reliability despite offering relatively decently priced maintenance. While its maintenance costs average $2,776 over the first five years, notably lower than the industry average, this advantage is overshadowed by a significant risk: a 5% chance of requiring major repairs during this initial ownership period.
The vehicle’s build quality has been a particular source of frustration in recent models, with widespread issues frequently reported concerning body hardware. These problems encompass malfunctions with windows, locks, latches, and seat controls, indicating fundamental flaws in assembly and durability. Such recurring issues cast a shadow over the overall craftsmanship and long-term resilience of the vehicle.
Furthermore, quality control concerns extend beyond mechanical components. Owners have commonly reported various electrical troubles, including persistent dash light problems that can be both annoying and indicative of deeper issues. Malfunctioning heated seats also frequently appear on the list of complaints, further detracting from the comfort and convenience features expected. These persistent build quality problems collectively make it difficult to justify the Envision’s premium market positioning.
Read more about: Rewind & Reflect: 14 Vintage Car Commercials That Couldn’t Air Today
14. **Mazda CX-9**The Mazda CX-9 often projects an image of near-luxury refinement and engaging driving dynamics within the three-row SUV segment. However, its perceived upscale aspirations are unfortunately undermined by a combination of practical limitations and notable maintenance concerns that can significantly impact long-term ownership satisfaction.
While maintenance costs average $7,778 over ten years, better than the industry average by $472, this statistic alone does not fully capture the vehicle’s long-term reliability profile. Despite the favorable average, there remains a nearly 22% chance of requiring a major repair during that decade-long period. This elevated risk of substantial, unexpected expenses means owners could still face significant financial burdens.
One of the most significant practical drawbacks is its third-row seating, widely described as nearly unusable for adult passengers. This limitation severely curtails the vehicle’s effectiveness as a true seven-seater. Adding to these issues, the CX-9’s fuel efficiency often proves disappointing, with real-world consumption figures frequently falling short of EPA estimates, and surprisingly limited cargo space behind the third row.
Car Model Information: 2022 Mazda CX-9 Sport
Name: Mazda CX-9
Manufacturer: Mazda
Production: April 2006 – 2024
ModelYears: 2007–2023
Class: Mid-size crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: unbulleted list
Successor: Mazda CX-90
Sp: us
Categories: 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, Articles with short description, CS1 Japanese-language sources (ja)
Summary: The Mazda CX-9 is a mid-size crossover SUV manufactured by Mazda in Japan since 2006 through two generations with three-row seating, it was Mazda’s largest passenger vehicle until the arrival of the CX-90.
Despite being built in Japan at Mazda’s Ujina #1 plant in Hiroshima Prefecture, the CX-9 was never offered in the Japanese domestic market. The shorter and narrower Mazda CX-8 was offered in Japan instead. Production was ended in 2024, with the Mazda CX-90 serving as its successor.
Get more information about: Mazda CX-9
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Mazda Model: CX-9
Price: $22,127 Mileage: 72,495 mi.
Read more about: For the Family Man: The 10 Safest Crossover Bargains of 2025 You Can’t Afford to Miss
As we conclude this in-depth analysis, it’s clear that the journey of SUV ownership is fraught with more variables than a shiny paint job or a tempting price tag can reveal. From models that rapidly succumb to mechanical fatigue and interior wear to those burdened by astronomical ownership costs and fundamental design flaws, the spectrum of long-term reliability and satisfaction varies wildly. Our comprehensive exploration of these 14 SUVs aims to cut through the marketing noise, providing you with the essential, unbiased data needed to make a truly informed decision. Remember, the true value of an SUV isn’t just in its initial purchase, but in the years of dependable service and financial peace it can offer, or the unexpected burdens it might impose. Choose wisely, armed with knowledge, and ensure your next SUV is a lasting asset, not a rapidly developing money pit.
