The automotive landscape has undergone a seismic shift over the last three decades, with once-dominant sedans and wagons increasingly giving way to a new breed of vehicle: the crossover. For many dedicated car enthusiasts, this transformation has been nothing short of a “dystopian nightmare,” a vision of a future where “the streets are filled with anonymous blobs solely designed to shuttle people from home to work and back, with no attention paid to driving dynamics whatsoever.” It’s a premonition that, in many respects, has already come to pass, as the market is undeniably saturated with vehicles that, from a performance-oriented perspective, offer little to truly excite.
This profound change has ignited a fierce debate within the broader automotive community. While some proponents argue that modern crossovers have significantly improved, evolving to a point where they can even appeal to “secret admirers” among enthusiasts, a critical and objective evaluation reveals a more complex truth. Many current models still embody the very definition of “boring,” failing to deliver on the promise of engaging driving experiences that passionate car people crave. This detailed analysis, leveraging expert critical assessments and specific performance data, aims to cut through the subjective noise and identify those models that, for a multitude of valid reasons, consistently fall short of igniting the passion of true driving aficionados.
In this in-depth exploration, we dissect twelve such vehicles, meticulously examining what makes them consistently miss the mark for enthusiast expectations. From egregious design flaws and persistently lackluster powertrains to a fundamental disconnect from genuinely engaging driving dynamics, these are the crossovers that critical reviews and performance specifications collectively identify as the most uninspired choices in today’s fiercely competitive market. Our objective is to rigorously demonstrate that not every CUV is created equal, particularly when measured against the demanding standards and specific preferences of a seasoned car enthusiast.
1. **Ford EcoSport**The Ford EcoSport stands as a stark and unfortunate prime example of a crossover that utterly fails to live up to the promise embedded in its very name, proving to be neither genuinely sporty nor particularly eco-friendly. This vehicle has consistently garnered widespread universal dislike within the competitive subcompact segment, with Ford’s ultimate decision to discontinue it serving as a quiet admission of its comprehensive and pervasive shortcomings. For enthusiasts, in particular, there was conspicuously little to appreciate or commend in its fundamentally utilitarian design and persistently abysmal performance metrics.
At the heart of the EcoSport’s considerable problems lies its diminutive three-cylinder engine, anemic and perpetually struggling to deliver any semblance of spirited or engaging driving. This fundamental lack of power ensures that the vehicle lags significantly behind even its already modestly powered smaller competitors, such as the Nissan Kicks or the Kia Soul. This pronounced power deficit translates directly into a driving experience that is unequivocally devoid of any enthusiasm, where even routine acceleration feels sluggish and highway merges demand an uncomfortably considerable amount of pre-planning and caution.
Beyond its mechanical deficiencies, the EcoSport’s interior environment is consistently cited as a significant point of contention. Universally described as the “opposite of spacious,” the cramped cabin ensures a perpetually “rough ride for everyone on board,” a stark contrast to the expectation of comfort and versatile utility commonly associated with a modern crossover. This lack of interior volume highlights a fundamental flaw in its packaging and design philosophy.
With a starting price of $21,990, many analysts have asserted that the EcoSport “really shows where it cut corners to reduce costs,” delivering a profoundly poor value for money. Its fuel economy figures, at 23 city mpg and 29 highway, are consistently described as “nothing impressive,” further detracting from any practical appeal. Consistently low rankings from trusted outlets like U.S. News & World Report, placing it 15th for subcompact SUVs and 58th for all crossover SUVs, unequivocally underscore its status as one of the least desirable options.
Read more about: Navigating New Car Warranties: Spotting the Best, Understanding Manufacturer Challenges, and Avoiding Costly Pitfalls
2. **Fiat 500X**As the sole remaining Fiat model available in the United States market, the 500X unequivocally epitomizes the profound struggle to compete effectively in the fiercely contested crossover segment. From a discerning enthusiast’s comprehensive perspective, this particular vehicle is burdened by a litany of interconnected issues, commencing most notably with its intensely polarizing and often widely criticized aesthetic. As one automotive critic bluntly, yet accurately, puts it, the vehicle is “just plain ugly,” a visual assessment that frequently deters potential buyers “not even interested in hearing anything else about it” after their initial, often unfavorable, encounter.
Moving beyond its undeniably questionable visual appeal, the 500X’s core performance capabilities and fundamental practical aspects are equally, if not more, underwhelming for any discerning driver. Its consistently reported “bad” fuel economy figures, coupled with a notable and frustrating absence of sufficient “passenger or cargo space on the inside,” immediately serves to disqualify it as a genuinely compelling choice for those actively seeking either economic efficiency or adaptable utility. Moreover, its relatively high starting price of $26,840 is definitively “quite a bit higher than other crossovers with similar specs,” thereby presenting a demonstrably poor value proposition.
The inherent problem with the Fiat 500X is not merely its individual shortcomings but its inability to measure up to its direct rivals. When meticulously stacked against its numerous peers in the subcompact crossover category, the Fiat 500X consistently and unambiguously falls demonstrably short across virtually all key metrics. Competitors such as the Hyundai Kona, Nissan Kicks, Kia Seltos, Mazda CX-30, Honda HR-V, and Subaru Crosstrek are all frequently and accurately cited by critics as consistently providing “better, well, everything for a similar or lower price.”
The critical consensus is overwhelmingly negative. Kelley Blue Book’s authoritative ranking places the 2022 Kia Seltos at the undisputed top of its class (starting at $23,665), while simultaneously relegating the Fiat 500X to an ignominious position “dead last on that same list and costs more money.” This paints an unambiguously clear and damning picture of its deeply uncompetitive and undesirable standing. For enthusiasts, this unfortunate combination of unappealing design, poor intrinsic performance, and conspicuously poor value makes it an unequivocally boring, and frankly, easily avoidable choice.
Read more about: The Road to Ruin: 15 Foreign Fails That America Just Couldn’t (or Wouldn’t) Understand
3. **Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross**The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, particularly models manufactured for the 2020 model year and all preceding iterations, represents a profound and regrettable missed opportunity, one that regrettably tarnishes a revered nameplate once widely synonymous with genuinely sporty and engaging driving. For many discerning enthusiasts, the very act of reviving the historically significant “Eclipse” moniker for what is ultimately a compact SUV that delivers “about as plain and boring as possible” performance is nothing short of a significant insult to its heritage. While the 2022 redesign did indeed offer a few superficial upgrades, even this refreshed iteration “hasn’t helped much” in fundamentally elevating the vehicle’s overall appeal or improving its intrinsic dynamic capabilities.
At its technical core, the Eclipse Cross is propelled by an uninspiring 152-horsepower inline-four engine, a powertrain invariably paired with a continuously variable transmission (CVT). This particular combination, widely regarded by enthusiasts as inherently unengaging, virtually guarantees a profound lack of driving excitement and dynamic involvement. The “lack of sportiness and fun drivability” is a critically damaging blow to its credibility, especially when one considers the performance-oriented legacy implied by its historic namesake. This is unequivocally not a vehicle designed for engaging dynamics or a visceral connection to the road.
Despite its glaring performance deficiencies, the Eclipse Cross does manage to achieve a surprisingly respectable 9.3/10 safety rating from U.S. News, offering a modicum of reassurance. However, any potential positive impression is quickly eroded by its other critical assessments, which are uniformly poor and deeply concerning. The critic’s rating languishes at a dismal 5/10, its overall performance score stands at a meager 6.1/10, and even its interior is rated with an underwhelming 6/10. These alarmingly low figures paint a damning and comprehensive picture of a vehicle that demonstrably struggles across virtually all key metrics important to any discerning driver.
The lack of critical acclaim extends further, with Kelley Blue Book positioning the 2020 model year Eclipse Cross all the way down at number 12 on its authoritative list of the best compact SUVs. This consistent pattern of poor rankings and critical evaluations from multiple reputable sources solidifies its unenviable position as a vehicle that one should unequivocally “steer clear” of, particularly for enthusiasts who are actively seeking anything beyond the most basic and uninspired functionality from their automotive investment. The lingering question remains whether Mitsubishi will ever be able to reclaim the dynamic heritage of the Eclipse nameplate.
Car Model Information: 2020 Volkswagen Tiguan 2.0T SE
Name: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Manufacturer: Mitsubishi Motors
ModelCode: GK,GL,YA,YB
Production: October 2017–present
ModelYears: 2018–present
Assembly: unbulleted list
Designer: Norihiko Yoshimine and Atsushi Goto
Class: Compact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: unbulleted list
Platform: Mitsubishi GS platform
Related: unbulleted list
Engine: unbulleted list
Powerout: unbulleted list
Abbr: on
Transmission: unbulleted list
Wheelbase: 2670 mm
Length: unbulleted list
Width: 1805 mm
Height: 1685 mm
Weight: unbulleted list
Successor: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross EV
Categories: 2020s cars, ASEAN NCAP small off-road, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in British English, Articles with short description
Summary: The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is a compact crossover SUV produced by Japanese automaker Mitsubishi Motors since October 2017. It was previewed by the XR-PHEV and XR-PHEV II concepts, revealed in 2013 and 2015. The production version was first introduced at the 87th Geneva Motor Show in March 2017. It slots between the RVR/ASX/Outlander Sport and Outlander in Mitsubishi’s global crossover lineup.
The diesel variant was launched in June 2019, followed by the PHEV variant in December 2020. The diesel is not available in North America. The name of this vehicle originates from the unrelated compact sports car, the Eclipse. Unlike the original Eclipse, however, the Eclipse Cross is not assembled in the United States as Mitsubishi closed its Diamond-Star Motors plant in Normal, Illinois in February 2016. Instead, the SUV is assembled in Japan, China, and Brazil.
Get more information about: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Mitsubishi Model: Eclipse Cross
Price: $21,000 Mileage: 37,875 mi.
Read more about: Unearthing the Beasts: 12 Forgotten ’90s Powerhouses That Still Outrun Modern Machines by 2025
4. **Buick Encore**The Buick Encore, a prevalent sight on American roads, frequently finds itself squarely in the crosshairs of discerning car enthusiasts, often serving as a quintessential example of the “boring car” that is perennially available at countless dealerships. It is widely perceived as a vehicle conceived and designed primarily for the mass market and general populace, rather than for the singular pursuit of genuine driving pleasure. Its distinctive “egg-shaped” profile, a stark contrast to the more robust and traditionally “blocky SUVs of yore,” visually communicates a deliberate departure from genuinely rugged or overtly aspirational SUV design. Instead, it leans heavily into a softer, more anonymous, and ultimately uninspired aesthetic that many enthusiasts find profoundly unappealing.
This particular compact crossover, in its very essence, embodies the segment’s increasingly pronounced evolution towards prioritizing everyday convenience and broad accessibility over the more demanding requirements of dynamic prowess. While the Encore may indeed offer a perfectly comfortable ride for routine daily commuting, it very rarely, if ever, manages to spark any genuine excitement or engagement behind the steering wheel. The vehicle’s inherently modest powertrain options and its rather predictable handling characteristics are meticulously optimized for basic urban maneuverability and pragmatic fuel efficiency, thereby leaving precious little room for the kind of engaging feedback or spirited acceleration that true car enthusiasts unequivocally seek.
The Buick Encore’s operational philosophy is firmly rooted in the concept of effortless utility, appealing to those who view a car as primarily a functional tool rather than an extension of driving passion. This practical but uninspiring approach is evident in its drivetrain which, while adequate for daily tasks, offers none of the dynamic layers that create a memorable driving experience. For an enthusiast, the lack of crisp throttle response, the absence of communicative steering, and the generally subdued suspension tuning all contribute to a sensation of detachment from the road.
In a competitive market increasingly dominated by a vast array of crossovers, the Encore’s deliberate design and performance strategy positions it squarely as a vehicle primarily intended for “so-called normals.” This demographic’s paramount concern is reliable and economical transport, rather than the exhilaration and sensory satisfaction of an engaging driving experience. This unwavering functional focus, combined with its conspicuously unassuming styling, contributes significantly and negatively to its widespread perception as a profoundly mundane and utterly uninspired choice among enthusiasts.
Car Model Information: 2020 Buick Encore Preferred
Name: Buick Encore
Manufacturer: General Motors
Production: 2012–2022
ModelYears: 2013–2022
Class: Subcompact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Successor: Buick Envista
Categories: 2010s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, Articles with short description, Buick vehicles
Summary: The Buick Encore is a subcompact crossover SUV built by General Motors from 2012 to 2022. It is subcompact crossover SUV marketed by Buick and its fourth SUV overall after the Rendezvous, Rainier, and Enclave.
The “Encore” designation was previously used by American Motors Corporation (AMC) for the subcompact two and four-door hatchback variants of the U.S.-built front-wheel drive Renault Alliance from 1984 to 1987.
Get more information about: Buick Encore
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Buick Model: Encore
Price: $14,990 Mileage: 64,227 mi.
Read more about: The Road to Ruin: 15 Foreign Fails That America Just Couldn’t (or Wouldn’t) Understand
5. **Ford Edge**The Ford Edge is another prominent crossover that frequently finds itself at the center of critical discussions surrounding generic and uninspired vehicles, often pithily described as a “five-passenger four-door fat hatchback with a decent amount of ground clearance and cargo space. You know, like every other crossover.” This particularly pointed critique, frequently leveraged by incisive automotive publications, succinctly highlights its pervasive perceived lack of distinctiveness and individual character in what is an undeniably overcrowded and highly competitive market segment. This critical assessment directly contributes to its widespread classification as “boring” by a significant number of discerning enthusiasts.
From an objective performance standpoint, the standard Ford Edge, conspicuously outside the realm of its more dynamically inclined ST variant, consistently offers a driving experience that is, by and large, profoundly unremarkable and forgettable. While it is demonstrably capable of efficiently transporting both people and cargo, it very seldom manages to deliver the kind of sharp, responsive handling, brisk acceleration, or truly communicative road feedback that would genuinely capture the imagination and interest of a performance-oriented driver. Its broad market appeal and design philosophy inherently prioritize a ride that emphasizes comfort, predictable stability, and general ease of use over any semblance of exhilaration.
A significant factor contributing to the Edge’s perception as a generic and uninspired offering is intricately tied to the broader sentiment within the enthusiast community regarding Ford’s prestigious “ST” brand. Even the purportedly performance-oriented enthusiasts consistently admit they are “not too enamored with the Explorer ST or Edge ST.” This lack of enthusiasm stems from a trio of fundamental reasons: their inherent identity as crossovers, their ubiquitous reliance on automatic transmissions, and the perceived “dilution” of the once-exclusive ST brand cachet.
If the very performance-tuned variants of the Edge struggle significantly to impress and excite the target audience of enthusiasts, the standard Edge, with its inevitably more modest specifications and decidedly less aggressive tuning, is unequivocally relegated to the expansive and often indistinguishable realm of the profoundly unexciting. It is a vehicle that is designed to blend seamlessly into the vast and growing sea of similar offerings, fulfilling a utilitarian role without ever truly standing out or provoking a genuine emotional response from behind the wheel. For the enthusiast seeking dynamism, the Edge remains a competent but ultimately uninspiring choice.
Car Model Information: 2022 Ford Edge SEL
Name: Ford Edge
Caption: 2019 Ford Edge SEL EcoBoost AWD (US)
Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company
Production: 2006–present
ModelYears: 2007–2024 (CAN/US),2016–2021 (Europe),2015–2019 (UK)
Class: Mid-size crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout
Categories: 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles with short description
Summary: The Ford Edge is a crossover SUV manufactured and marketed by the Ford Motor Company introduced for the 2007 model year as the first mid-size CUV marketed by Ford in North America. Deriving its name from a trim package of the Ford Ranger, the Ford Edge is positioned between the Ford Escape and the Ford Explorer within the Ford product line.
Production of the North American Edge ended in April 2024, with the third generation Edge (dubbed the Edge L), launched in 2023, being produced and sold exclusively in China.
Sharing its underpinnings with the Ford Fusion sedan, Ford also marketed a rebadged variant as the Lincoln MKX (since 2019, the Lincoln Nautilus). The second generation is also marketed by Ford of Europe, positioned between the Kuga (Escape) and the Explorer PHEV.
Manufacturing of the first two generations took place at Oakville Assembly (Oakville, Ontario) alongside the Nautilus.
Get more information about: Ford Edge
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Ford Model: Edge
Price: $21,990 Mileage: 30,875 mi.
Read more about: Protecting Your Purchase: A Consumer Report on Top Car Warranties and Key Manufacturer Recall Trends
6. **Ford Explorer**While the Ford Explorer boasts an undeniably long-standing and prominent presence in the American automotive market, its current iteration, particularly when scrutinized through the demanding lens of enthusiasts, frequently falls squarely into the “boring” category, often finding itself significantly overshadowed by its more dynamically engaging competitors. The context directly addresses this widespread sentiment by noting that “enthusiasts aren’t too enamored with the Explorer ST” for a distinct set of specific reasons: primarily its inherent identity as a crossover, its ubiquitous reliance on an automatic transmission, and its perceived role in “diluting the ‘ST’ brand” that was once reserved for more focused performance vehicles.
If even the Explorer ST, a variant explicitly designed with performance aspirations and proudly bearing the ST badge, struggles to genuinely win over dedicated enthusiasts, the standard Explorer model presents an even less compelling and arguably more profoundly unexciting case for genuine driving enjoyment. The core criticisms that are justifiably levied against the Explorer ST apply with significantly greater force and unwavering relevance to the standard Explorer. These vehicles are primarily engineered for the overarching purposes of family utility, maximizing passenger comfort, and providing practical hauling capabilities, rather than being meticulously crafted for the nuances of spirited driving dynamics.
This pronounced emphasis on comfortably accommodating growing families and their substantial array of gear inevitably comes at the direct expense of crucial performance attributes such as nimble and precise handling, direct and communicative steering feedback, and that highly coveted, visceral connection to the road – all intrinsic attributes that are profoundly valued and actively sought by discerning car aficionados. The standard Explorer, while undeniably competent for its intended purpose, prioritizes practicality over passenger engagement.
Furthermore, the argument presented by some enthusiasts, contending that the ST brand, despite having “only existed in America for a little over five years,” is already facing significant “dilution” by the introduction of models like the Explorer ST, reveals a deep-seated apprehension within the enthusiast community. This sentiment strongly suggests that vehicles like the Explorer, irrespective of their undeniable mass-market success, are perceived as being fundamentally at odds with the pure performance ethos that many cherish. For those drivers who demand more than merely a competent means to “haul everything a family needs for a road trip,” the standard Ford Explorer represents a significant concession to practicality that ultimately leads to a less engaging, and therefore more boring, driving experience.
Car Model Information: 2022 Ford Explorer Platinum
Name: Ford Explorer
Caption: Sixth-generation Ford Explorer
Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company
Production: 1990–present
ModelYears: 1991–present
Class: unbulleted list
Chassis: unbulleted list
Predecessor: Ford Bronco II
Successor: Ford Territory (Australia)
Categories: 2000s cars, 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles in need of updating
Summary: The Ford Explorer is a range of SUVs manufactured by the Ford Motor Company since the 1991 model year. The first five-door SUV produced by Ford, the Explorer, was introduced as a replacement for the three-door Bronco II. As with the Ford Ranger, the model line derives its name from a trim package previously offered on Ford F-Series pickup trucks. As of 2020, the Explorer became the best-selling SUV in the American market.
Currently in its sixth generation, the Explorer has featured a five-door wagon body style since its 1991 introduction. During the first two generations, the model line included a three-door wagon (directly replacing the Bronco II). The Ford Explorer Sport Trac is a crew-cab mid-size pickup derived from the second-generation Explorer. The fifth and sixth generations of the Explorer have been produced as the Ford Police Interceptor Utility (replacing both the Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptor and the Ford Police Interceptor Sedan).
The Explorer is slotted between the Ford Edge and Ford Expedition within North America’s current Ford SUV range. The model line has undergone rebadging several times, with Mazda, Mercury, and Lincoln each selling derivative variants. Currently, Lincoln markets a luxury version of the Explorer as the Lincoln Aviator.
For the North American market, the first four generations of the Explorer were produced by Ford at its Louisville Assembly Plant (Louisville, Kentucky) and its now-closed St. Louis Assembly Plant (Hazelwood, Missouri). Ford currently assembles the Explorer alongside the Lincoln Aviator and the Police Interceptor Utility at its Chicago Assembly Plant (Chicago, Illinois).
Get more information about: Ford Explorer
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Ford Model: Explorer
Price: $34,987 Mileage: 35,791 mi.
Read more about: Sinking 12000 Miles: The WW2 Aircraft Carrier That Somehow Survived
7. **Toyota RAV4**The Toyota RAV4 stands as an undisputed titan of the crossover segment, boasting remarkable sales figures that underscore its widespread appeal among the general public. However, for the discerning car enthusiast, this ubiquitous presence often elicits a different kind of recognition: that of an ‘appliance car.’ This label, while acknowledging its undeniable competence and reliability, inherently suggests a vehicle meticulously engineered for practical, everyday utility rather than for the elusive thrill of an engaging driving experience. Its phenomenal market success, paradoxically, often serves as a testament to its anonymous, rather than charismatic, nature from a performance perspective.
Delving into its specifications, the RAV4 presents a clear picture of prioritized efficiency and pragmatic design. A reader points out that the ‘RAV4 AWD 2.5 get 29 MPG combined compared to the Camry AWD 2.5’s 28 mpg combined,’ a figure that, while commendable for a crossover, is certainly not designed to set enthusiast hearts racing with power or raw performance. Its physical footprint on the road is notably smaller, yet it boasts ‘nearly identical to the Camry for passenger volume,’ highlighting efficient packaging. The argument for its ‘better’ footprint-to-interior-volume ratio and ‘more than double the cargo volume with all seats up and 4 times more with the seats down’ strongly emphasizes utility and versatility—qualities that, while invaluable for many buyers, typically take a backseat to dynamic prowess for true driving aficionados.
The RAV4’s capability to ‘tow 3500 lbs – which is a useful amount for utility and play’ further solidifies its credentials as a highly functional tool. For a car enthusiast, however, the ultimate judgment often hinges on what happens when the road begins to curve. The focus on ‘cargo versatility and utility are more important than an extra .04g on the skidpad’ for one particular enthusiast highlights a fundamental divergence in priorities. While it is undoubtedly a ‘good car,’ much like a Camry, its overall design philosophy leans heavily towards fulfilling a broad range of practical needs rather than delivering the kind of visceral feedback, sharp handling, or spirited acceleration that defines an enthusiast’s machine.
Ultimately, the Toyota RAV4’s immense popularity is a double-edged sword for its enthusiast perception. Its success is built upon a foundation of reliability, efficiency, and unparalleled practicality, making it a stellar choice for ‘normals’ seeking competent transport. Yet, precisely these attributes, when viewed through the critical lens of driving dynamics and performance, position it as a vehicle that, despite its many virtues, consistently falls short of igniting genuine passion or delivering a truly memorable, engaging experience for those who prioritize the art of driving. It is a testament to the ‘wagoning’ of the SUV, but not necessarily its transformation into a sports car.
Car Model Information: 2024 Toyota RAV4 LE
Name: Toyota RAV4
Caption: 2019 Toyota RAV4 LE AWD (AXAA54, US)
Manufacturer: Toyota
Aka: unbulleted list
Production: 1994–present
Class: Compact crossover SUV
Layout: unbulleted list
Categories: 2000s cars, 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in British English
Summary: The Toyota RAV4 (Japanese: トヨタ・RAV4, Hepburn: Toyota Ravufō) is a compact crossover SUV produced by the Japanese automobile manufacturer Toyota. It is known for starting the wave of compact crossovers. The RAV4 is one of the best-selling SUVs of all time, having sold over 10 million units by February 2020. In February 2025, the RAV4 replaced the Ford F-150 as the top selling car in the United States, after nearly four decades of the F-150’s reign.
It made its debut in Japan and Europe in 1994, and in North America in 1995, being launched in January 1996. The vehicle was designed for consumers wanting a vehicle that had most of the benefits of SUVs, such as increased cargo room, higher visibility, and the option of full-time four-wheel drive, along with the maneuverability of a mid-size car. The vehicle’s name is an abbreviation of “Recreational Active Vehicle with 4-wheel drive”, or “Robust Accurate Vehicle with 4-wheel drive”, although not all models come equipped with the four-wheel drive system.
For the third-generation model, Toyota offered both short- and long-wheelbase versions of the RAV4. Short-wheelbase versions were sold in Japan and Europe; long-wheelbase versions in Australia and North America. Toyota of Japan also sold the longer-wheelbase version as the Toyota Vanguard (Japanese: トヨタ・ヴァンガード, Hepburn: Toyota Vangādo) at Toyopet Store dealership chain from 2005 through 2016. RAV4 for the Japanese market were sold at two different Toyota dealership chains, Corolla Store and Netz.
Get more information about: Toyota RAV4
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Toyota Model: RAV4
Price: $26,690 Mileage: 46,221 mi.
Read more about: Decoding America’s Automotive Stratification: An In-Depth Look at Vehicle Classifications
8. **Honda CR-V**Much like its formidable rival, the Toyota RAV4, the Honda CR-V commands a significant share of the crossover market, revered for its unassailable reputation for reliability, intelligent packaging, and practical utility. Yet, for many seasoned car enthusiasts, the CR-V, too, falls squarely into the category of an ‘appliance car.’ This designation, devoid of genuine disdain, nonetheless underscores its primary design ethos: to function as an exceptionally competent, dependable, and sensible mode of transport, rather than a vessel for exhilarating driving dynamics. Its impressive sales figures—’outsold all of Audi by 50,000 units’ in 2022—speak volumes about its broad appeal to the mainstream, even as it quietly bypasses the specific desires of the performance-minded.
From a critical perspective, the CR-V’s strengths lie in its execution of fundamental automotive needs. Its interior boasts ‘materials and quality that easily outdoes any American car from the early 2000s; they’re nice places to be.’ This emphasis on refined comfort and robust build quality significantly elevates the daily commuting experience for its owners. However, these attributes, while admirable, do not directly translate into the kind of aggressive handling, communicative steering, or potent powertrain that enthusiasts actively seek to engage with. The vehicle’s inherent driving dynamics are meticulously tuned for comfort and predictability, ensuring a smooth, uneventful journey rather than one punctuated by dynamic thrills.
The CR-V’s role in the broader automotive ecosystem is also a subject of critical discussion. As a high-volume, profitable model, it indirectly supports the development and production of ‘small volume, lower-profit stuff’ like the GT86, Supra, Civic Type R, and Integra. This symbiotic relationship, while appreciated by some enthusiasts for enabling the existence of more focused performance cars, simultaneously highlights the CR-V’s own distinct identity as a utilitarian workhorse rather than a performance-bred machine itself. It exists to serve a practical purpose, allowing other vehicles to chase excitement.
In essence, the Honda CR-V embodies the modern crossover’s success in delivering pragmatic value and unflappable dependability. It is a vehicle that proficiently meets the diverse demands of daily life, offering ample space, respectable fuel efficiency, and a comfortable ride. However, for those whose passion lies in the tactile feedback of a responsive chassis, the surge of a potent engine, or the nuanced communication through a steering wheel, the CR-V, for all its undeniable virtues, remains a fundamentally unexciting proposition. It is an automotive appliance, perfectly calibrated for its purpose, but rarely provoking an emotional connection for the true driving enthusiast.
Car Model Information: 2020 Honda CR-V EX
Name: Honda CR-V
Caption: 2023 Honda CR-V e:HEV
Manufacturer: Honda
Aka: Honda Breeze (China, 2019–present)
Production: 1995–present
Class: Compact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: Sport utility vehicle
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout,Front-engine, four-wheel-drive layout
Chassis: Unibody
Predecessor: Honda Crossroad
Successor: Honda ZR-V
Categories: 2000s cars, 2010s cars, 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in British English
Summary: The Honda CR-V (also sold as the Honda Breeze in China since 2019) is a compact crossover SUV manufactured by Japanese automaker Honda since 1995. Initial models of the CR-V were built using the same platform as the Civic.
Honda began producing the CR-V in Sayama, Japan, and Swindon, United Kingdom, for worldwide markets, adding North American manufacturing sites in East Liberty, Ohio, United States, in 2007; El Salto, Jalisco, Mexico, in late 2007 (ended in early 2017); Alliston, Ontario, Canada, in 2012; and Greensburg, Indiana, United States, in February 2017. The CR-V is also produced in Wuhan for the Chinese market by Dongfeng Honda, and also marketed as the Breeze in China for the version produced at Guangzhou by Guangqi Honda.
Honda states that “CR-V” stands for “Comfortable Runabout Vehicle,” while the term “Compact Recreational Vehicle” was used in a British car review article that was republished by Honda, associating the model name with the Sports Utility Vehicle abbreviation of SU-V.
As of 2022, the CR-V is positioned between the smaller ZR-V (marketed as HR-V in North America) — with which the CR-V shares a platform — and the larger North American market Passport/Pilot or the Chinese market Avancier/UR-V. It is currently Honda’s best-selling vehicle in the world, and the second best-selling SUV globally in 2020.
Get more information about: Honda CR-V
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Honda Model: CR-V
Price: $20,995 Mileage: 71,622 mi.
Read more about: From Seamless Drives to Software Snafus: Unpacking the Digital Divide in 10 Brand-New Cars
9. **Tesla Model Y**The Tesla Model Y, a dominant force in the electric vehicle market, presents a fascinating case study in the enthusiast’s perception of crossovers. While its groundbreaking electric powertrain and rapid acceleration are undeniable, its overall design and driving persona often position it among vehicles criticized as ‘mostly a bloated regular car.’ This perception stems from its fundamentally utilitarian shape and its elevation—literally and figuratively—above traditional performance car archetypes, traits that often lead enthusiasts to label such vehicles as generic and lacking distinct character.
One of the primary critiques leveled against the Model Y, shared with many other crossovers, is its ‘raised center of gravity and increased headroom most people don’t really need.’ While these design elements contribute to practical benefits like easier ingress/egress and a commanding view of the road, they simultaneously detract from the low-slung, planted feel that performance driving enthusiasts typically covet. The inherent compromises in handling dynamics that come with a taller stance mean that, despite its impressive straight-line acceleration, the Model Y may not deliver the nuanced, communicative cornering experience that defines a truly engaging driver’s car.
Furthermore, the Model Y’s design philosophy, while undeniably modern and minimalist, often leans towards a homogenous aesthetic that contributes to the ‘anonymous blob’ phenomenon. Its smooth, aerodynamic lines prioritize efficiency and widespread appeal, resulting in a visual presence that, for some enthusiasts, lacks the aggressive styling cues or distinctive proportions traditionally associated with performance vehicles. This broad appeal can, paradoxically, render it less compelling to those seeking a truly unique or characterful automotive statement, despite its revolutionary powertrain technology.
Ultimately, while the Tesla Model Y undeniably pushes boundaries in terms of electric performance and technological integration, its inherent crossover architecture and design choices can temper its appeal to the most ardent driving enthusiasts. The trade-offs made for practicality, spaciousness, and broad market acceptance—such as its elevated ride height and somewhat generic profile—mean that it may not consistently deliver the kind of visceral, uncompromised driving excitement that truly ignites passion. It represents a significant step forward in EV technology, but within the context of pure driving dynamics, it can still fall short of the enthusiast’s ideal.
Read more about: Protecting Your Purchase: A Consumer Report on Top Car Warranties and Key Manufacturer Recall Trends
10. **Honda HR-V**The Honda HR-V, a prominent contender in the fiercely competitive subcompact crossover segment, consistently finds itself in a peculiar position when scrutinized by car enthusiasts. While it is often praised as a pragmatic and efficient choice, particularly when compared to less desirable alternatives like the Fiat 500X—offering ‘better, well, everything for a similar or lower price’—its inherent design and performance characteristics mean it rarely rises above the perception of a purely functional vehicle. For many, it embodies the essence of a competent, yet ultimately unexciting, mode of transport, perfectly aligned with the ‘anonymous blob’ narrative.
At its core, the HR-V is engineered with a steadfast focus on maximizing interior space, fuel efficiency, and Honda’s renowned reliability. These are laudable attributes for the vast majority of consumers, providing a sensible and economical solution for daily commuting and light family duties. However, this unwavering commitment to practicality often comes at the direct expense of dynamic driving engagement. The powertrain, while adequate for urban environments, is generally not tuned for spirited acceleration, and its handling, though predictable and safe, offers little in the way of communicative feedback or exhilarating cornering prowess for the enthusiastic driver.
The HR-V’s design, while contemporary and well-proportioned for its segment, adheres to a largely conservative aesthetic. It successfully blends into the modern automotive landscape, offering a palatable appearance without any radical styling choices that might polarize buyers or, conversely, capture the imagination of design-conscious enthusiasts. This understated approach, while beneficial for mass market appeal, contributes to its perceived lack of distinct character or ‘sporting credentials’ when compared to vehicles that prioritize visual aggression or dynamic flair.
In sum, the Honda HR-V epitomizes the very definition of a well-executed utilitarian crossover. It excels in delivering a reliable, fuel-efficient, and spatially efficient package that capably serves the needs of its broad customer base. However, for those who seek an emotional connection with their vehicle—a machine that stirs the senses with precise steering, eager throttle response, and a chassis that invites spirited driving—the HR-V, despite its numerous practical strengths, invariably falls short. It is a testament to Honda’s engineering excellence in functionality, but less so in delivering a truly captivating driving experience for the dedicated enthusiast.
Car Model Information: 2022 Honda HR-V EX
Name: Honda HR-V
Caption: Honda HR-V 1.5 Advance (RV5)
Aka: Honda ZR-V
Manufacturer: Honda
Production: 1999–2006,2013–present
Class: Subcompact crossover SUV
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout,Front-engine, four-wheel-drive layout
Categories: 2000s cars, 2010s cars, 2020s cars, ASEAN NCAP small off-road, All-wheel-drive vehicles
Summary: The Honda HR-V is a subcompact crossover SUV (B-segment) manufactured and marketed by Honda over three generations.
The first generation HR-V, based on the Honda Logo, was marketed from 1999 to 2006 in Europe, Japan and select Asia-Pacific markets, in either three-door (1999–2003) or five-door (1999–2006) configurations — internally designated GH2 and GH4 respectively.
After a seven-year hiatus, Honda reintroduced the nameplate for the second generation HR-V, based on the third-generation Honda Fit. Production began in late 2013 for the Japanese domestic market as the Honda Vezel (Japanese: ホンダ・ヴェゼル, Hepburn: Honda Vezeru), while production started in 2015 for North America, Australia, Brazil and select Asian markets as the HR-V. Apart from Japan, the model is also sold as the Vezel in China.
For the third-generation model, the nameplate is split between two different vehicles, one for the global market (sold as the Vezel in Japan), and a larger model based on the eleventh-generation Civic destined for North America and China. The latter model is sold outside those markets as the Honda ZR-V.
According to Honda, the name “HR-V” stands for “Hi-rider Revolutionary Vehicle”, while the name “Vezel” is coined from “bezel”, the oblique faces of a cut gem, with the “V” for “vehicle”.
Get more information about: Honda HR-V
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Honda Model: HR-V
Price: $20,961 Mileage: 57,356 mi.
Read more about: From Seamless Drives to Software Snafus: Unpacking the Digital Divide in 10 Brand-New Cars
11. **Subaru Crosstrek**The Subaru Crosstrek presents an intriguing paradox in the realm of enthusiast perception. While one reader enthusiastically praises it as a ‘little adventure mobile’ and extols its virtues for having ‘decent room, good power from the 2.5 litre, Dual Mode X-drive is quite frankly magic,’ and even defends its CVT transmission as ‘fine, folks. Really. It’s kind of a non-issue in this car,’ a critical examination reveals why it might still fall short of *some* enthusiast expectations, aligning with the ‘generic driving dynamics’ aspect of our ‘boring’ classification. Its strengths lie primarily in rugged utility and all-weather capability, rather than dynamic road performance.
The Crosstrek’s robust all-wheel-drive system and higher ground clearance are undeniably excellent for off-pavement excursions and challenging weather conditions. The mentioned ‘Dual Mode X-drive’ being ‘magic’ for ‘driving 4x4s in all kinds of sketchy conditions’ clearly positions it as a highly capable vehicle for utility and adventure. However, for enthusiasts who prioritize on-road agility, precise handling, and a truly engaging powertrain, these off-road focused attributes often imply compromises in asphalt performance. The added suspension travel and higher center of gravity, while ‘great for ty roads’ as one comment notes, can diminish the crispness of on-road handling compared to a lower-slung vehicle.
The persistent discussion around its Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) is particularly telling. While a loyal owner might find it ‘fine’ and a ‘non-issue,’ the very need to defend a CVT against traditional geared transmissions highlights a common point of contention for performance enthusiasts. CVTs, by their nature, often prioritize fuel economy and smooth power delivery over the immediate, tactile shifts and engine-speed control that drivers craving engagement prefer. This ‘compromised sporting credential’ prevents the Crosstrek from truly thrilling on a twisty back road in the same way a vehicle with a conventional automatic or manual transmission might.
Ultimately, the Subaru Crosstrek is a master of its intended domain: a practical, reliable, and highly capable all-weather utility vehicle perfectly suited for ‘adventure’ and navigating challenging terrain. Its genuine strengths in these areas make it highly valued by a segment of the population. However, when measured against the stringent criteria of dynamic driving pleasure, uncompromised powertrain response, and truly spirited on-road handling, it still occupies a space where its practicality and robust utility, while excellent, overshadow its capacity to deliver a truly thrilling or overtly ‘sporty’ experience for the broad spectrum of driving enthusiasts.
Car Model Information: 2019 Subaru Crosstrek 2.0i Limited
Name: Subaru Crosstrek
Caption: Subaru Crosstrek 2024
Manufacturer: Subaru
Aka: Subaru XV (global markets, 2012–2022),Subaru XV Crosstrek (United States and Canada, 2013–2015)
Production: 2012–present
Class: Compact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: ubl
Related: Subaru Impreza
Predecessor: Subaru Outback Sport
ModelYears: 2013–present
Categories: 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles containing Japanese-language text
Summary: The Subaru Crosstrek (Japanese: スバル・クロストレック, Hepburn: Subaru Kurosutorekku; also known as the Subaru XV globally for the first two generations) is a compact crossover SUV produced by Subaru since 2012. It is a successor to the Outback Sport in the United States and Canada, and the Impreza XV globally. Like the Outback Sport, the Crosstrek is a lifted Impreza hatchback with minor differences, though with a more substantial lift than the Outback Sport.
Initially, the vehicle was marketed as the XV globally, and as the XV Crosstrek in the United States and Canada. In 2015, Subaru dropped the XV moniker in the United States and Canada, marketing it simply as the Crosstrek for the 2016 model year and onward. In 2022, Subaru introduced the third-generation model, using the Crosstrek nameplate globally for the first time.
All generations of the Crosstrek are raised versions of the Subaru Impreza hatchback.
Get more information about: Subaru Crosstrek
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Subaru Model: Crosstrek
Price: $18,452 Mileage: 108,181 mi.
Read more about: 9 Compact Cars Making a Big Splash in 2025: Expert Picks and Detailed Analysis
12. **Mazda CX-5**The Mazda CX-5 frequently garners praise for its refined styling and above-average driving dynamics within the highly competitive compact crossover segment. It stands out from many of its contemporaries by offering a more engaging experience, often being lauded for its ‘car-like’ handling. However, even with these commendable attributes, a critical examination through an enthusiast’s lens, as evidenced by one candid reader’s confession, reveals that it still largely falls into the category of a vehicle chosen out of practical necessity rather than genuine, unbridled passion. The telling statement: ‘I have a CX-5, and I don’t hate it. But, if there had been a comparably-priced wagon around I never would have given the CX-5 a second look,’ succinctly captures this nuanced perception.
This sentiment underscores a prevalent theme among enthusiasts: the CX-5, despite its dynamic competence, remains a compromise for many. While its driving characteristics are indeed superior to many ‘anonymous blobs,’ it ultimately does not fully replicate the lower center of gravity, often more sophisticated suspension tuning, or direct road feel of a dedicated wagon or hatchback. The ‘added suspension travel is great for ty roads,’ and its tires typically ‘get more sidewall too,’ exemplified by ‘the CX-5 base wears 225-65-R17s, or 225-55R19s for the turbo while the Mazda6 gets 225-55R17s base and 225-45R19s on the GT.’ These features, while beneficial for comfort and utility, inherently mean a departure from the sharper, more immediate responses typically sought in a performance-oriented vehicle.
The CX-5’s appeal lies in its ability to strike a balance—offering a palatable blend of SUV utility with a driving experience that avoids the complete detachment found in more generic offerings. This balance, however, means it exists in a grey area; it’s not truly an uninspired blob, but it also isn’t a performance beacon. Its strengths are relative to other crossovers, rather than absolute in the enthusiast world. The ‘taller roofline is really useful when you need to pack people and cargo at the same time,’ and ‘Most crossovers have enough headroom that a tall guy could wear a top hat,’ further emphasizing practical advantages over pure driving exhilaration.
While the Mazda CX-5 admirably attempts to bridge the gap between practical utility and engaging driving, its inherent identity as a crossover means it ultimately makes compromises that prevent it from fully satisfying the purist enthusiast. It’s a testament to Mazda’s commitment to driving pleasure, even in a practical package, but the longing for a traditional wagon indicates that for many, it’s a very good alternative, not the first choice. For those who prioritize raw driving dynamics and unadulterated performance, the CX-5, though a strong performer within its class, still fits the description of a vehicle chosen with an eye toward practicality and compromise.
Car Model Information: 2023 Mazda CX-5 2.5 S Select
Name: Mazda CX-5
Caption: Second generation CX-5 (KF; 2024)
Manufacturer: Mazda
Production: 2012–present
ModelYears: 2013–present
Class: Compact crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Layout: unbulleted list
Predecessor: unbulleted list
Categories: 2020s cars, All-wheel-drive vehicles, All articles containing potentially dated statements, All articles lacking reliable references, All articles with dead external links
Summary: The Mazda CX-5 is a compact crossover SUV, produced by Mazda since 2012. A successor to both the Tribute and the slightly larger CX-7, it is Mazda’s first model to feature the “Kodo” design language and the first model to be fully developed with a range of technologies branded as Skyactiv, including a rigid, lightweight platform combined with a series of engines and transmissions to reduce emissions and fuel consumption.
Since 2019, the CX-5 is positioned above the smaller CX-30. As of 2022, depending on the region, the CX-5 is positioned right below the larger CX-50, CX-60 or the CX-8 within Mazda’s crossover SUV line-up.
Since 2014, the CX-5 has consistently been Mazda’s best-selling model globally. It achieved record sales in 2019, with 444,262 units sold worldwide. As of March 2022, cumulative sales of the CX-5 reached around 3.5 million units.
Get more information about: Mazda CX-5
Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Mazda Model: CX-5
Price: $23,871 Mileage: 44,320 mi.
Read more about: From Seamless Drives to Software Snafus: Unpacking the Digital Divide in 10 Brand-New Cars
The ongoing evolution of the automotive landscape presents a continuous challenge for enthusiasts to adapt their perceptions. While the market is undeniably saturated with vehicles prioritizing practicality and broad appeal, the critical distinction for true car people lies in identifying those models that genuinely stir the soul versus those that merely fulfill a utilitarian role. Our comprehensive analysis of these twelve crossovers underscores a fundamental truth: while some excel at being ‘good cars’ for the masses, many still struggle to transcend the label of ‘anonymous blobs’ when measured against the demanding standards of performance, engagement, and pure driving passion. The debate continues, but the data and critical consensus are clear: not all crossovers are created equal, especially for those who truly love to drive.
.jpg "23 Quirky and Surprising Facts That Will Fascinate You")
