Unvarnished Truth: 14 ‘Classic’ American Cars That Delivered Awful Driving Experiences

1956 Mercedes-Benz Alloy Gullwing: The $10 Million Los Angeles Secret — All American Classic Cars: 1956 Chevrolet Bel Air 2-Door Hardtop Sport Coupe, Photo by bp.blogspot.com, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

The allure of classic American cars often conjures images of chrome-laden cruisers, roaring V8s, and a golden era of automotive design. Enthusiasts worldwide cherish these vehicles for their nostalgic appeal, distinctive styling, and the stories they tell about a bygone era. Yet, as much as we love to romanticize the past, the reality of classic car ownership, and indeed, the initial experience of many supposedly ‘iconic’ models, often tells a different, less glamorous tale.

While we readily acknowledge that any older vehicle will present its maintenance challenges due to age and wear, some so-called classics were fundamentally flawed from the outset. These were the machines that, even fresh off the assembly line, were plagued by design blunders, engineering shortcomings, and a driving experience that left much to be desired. They stand as stark reminders that not every automotive venture is a triumph, regardless of the marketing hype or initial promise.

In the spirit of objective assessment and an unblinking look at automotive history, we embark on a journey to uncover a collection of American classics that, despite their eventual or perceived iconic status, were, in truth, genuinely awful to drive. This first half of our exposé delves into seven such vehicles, examining the inherent flaws that defined them and cemented their place in the annals of automotive disappointment.

“1958 Ford Edsel” by GPS 56 is licensed under CC BY 2.0

1. **Ford Edsel**Launched in 1958 with a thunderous wave of marketing, the Ford Edsel was intended to be a revolutionary new vehicle, a shining star in Ford’s lineup. However, its debut quickly turned into one of the most infamous commercial failures in automotive history. The car’s overhyped arrival only magnified its subsequent and significant shortcomings, setting a precedent for how quickly public perception can turn.

Central to its struggle was the controversial “horse collar” grille design, which polarized opinion and became an immediate point of criticism. Beyond aesthetics, the Edsel was also burdened with advanced features that consistently failed to work reliably, undermining any claims of innovation. These mechanical issues, combined with high price tags, quickly deterred potential buyers who expected more for their investment.

Ultimately, the Edsel’s myriad problems led to its discontinuation in 1960, just two years after its introduction. Its legacy is not one of a beloved classic, but rather a cautionary tale of hubris in design and execution. For enthusiasts and historians, the Edsel remains a monument to how even the most ambitious projects can miss the mark spectacularly.

Car Model Information: 1959 Edsel Ranger
BirthName: Edsel Bryant Ford
Caption: Ford in 1921
BirthDate: [object Object]
BirthPlace: Detroit, Michigan
DeathDate: [object Object]
DeathPlace: Grosse Pointe Shores, Michigan
Occupation: Automobile executive
Title: Ford Motor Company
Spouse: [object Object]
Parents: Henry Ford,Clara Bryant Ford
Relations: Edsel Ford II
Children: Henry Ford II,Benson Ford,Josephine Ford,William Clay Ford Sr.
Categories: 1893 births, 1943 deaths, 20th-century American businesspeople, All Wikipedia articles written in American English, All articles with dead external links
Summary: Edsel Bryant Ford (November 6, 1893 – May 26, 1943) was an American business executive and philanthropist, who was the only child of pioneering industrialist Henry Ford and his wife, Clara Jane Bryant Ford. He was the president of Ford Motor Company from 1919 until his death in 1943. He worked closely with his father, as sole heir to the business, but was keen to develop cars more exciting than the Model T (“Tin Lizzie”), in line with his personal tastes. Even as president, he had trouble persuading his father to allow any departure from this formula. Only a change in market conditions enabled him to develop the more fashionable Model A in 1927. Edsel also founded the Mercury division and was responsible for the Lincoln-Zephyr and Lincoln Continental. He introduced important features, such as hydraulic brakes, and greatly strengthened the company’s overseas production. Ford was a major art benefactor in Detroit and also financed Admiral Richard Byrd’s polar explorations. He died of stomach cancer aged 49. Henry Ford temporarily reassumed the presidency of Ford Motor Company on Edsel’s death, then Edsel’s eldest son, Henry Ford II, succeeded Henry as president of the company in 1945. He was also a member of the board of directors of American IG, the American subsidiary of the German chemical conglomerate IG Farben.

Get more information about: Edsel Ford

Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Ford Model: Edsel
Price: $19,000 Mileage: 21,529 mi.

Chevrolet Vega (1971) — 1971 Chevrolet Vega | Classic Auto Mall, Photo by dealeraccelerate.com, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

2. **Chevrolet Vega**The Chevrolet Vega, introduced in 1970, represented GM’s attempt to challenge the rising tide of compact imports with a modern, American-made alternative. Initially praised for its design, the Vega quickly developed an unenviable reputation for profound build quality and reliability issues that overshadowed any of its early aesthetic appeal. It became a poster child for the pitfalls of hurried development.

Engine problems were particularly rampant, with widespread reports of excessive oil burning and overheating, leading to premature engine failures. Rust also proved to be an unusually rapid assailant, developing on the bodywork far faster than expected, turning many fairly new Vegas into unsightly, corroded shells. These fundamental flaws made long-term ownership a significant headache for many.

The litany of reliability problems meant that the Vega’s initially promising design was soon forgotten in a wave of consumer complaints and dissatisfaction. Despite its ambitious goals, the car’s mechanical fragility and poor durability led to its early demise in 1977, cementing its status as one of Chevrolet’s less glorious chapters.

Car Model Information: 1976 Chevrolet Vega
Name: Chevrolet Vega
Caption: 1971 Chevrolet Vega
Aka: Vega 2300
Manufacturer: Chevrolet
Production: 1970–1977
ModelYears: 1971–1977
Assembly: Lordstown, Ohio
Predecessor: Chevrolet Corvair
Successor: Chevrolet Monza
Class: Subcompact car
BodyStyle: notchback,hatchback,station wagon,Panel van
Layout: FR layout
Platform: GM H platform (RWD)
Engine: {{cvt,2.3,L,cuin,0,Chevrolet 2300 engine
Transmission: manual transmission,4-speed manual,overdrive (mechanics),Torque-Drive 2-speed Powerglide requiring manual shifting,Powerglide,Turbo-Hydramatic
Wheelbase: cvt
Length: cvt
Width: cvt
Height: cvt
Weight: cvt
Related: Pontiac Astre,Chevrolet Monza,Pontiac Sunbird#First generation (1976–1980),Buick Skyhawk#First generation (1975–1980),Oldsmobile Starfire#Second generation (1975–1980)
Designer: Bill Mitchell (designer)
Categories: 1970s cars, All articles needing additional references, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles needing additional references from July 2023, Articles with short description
Summary: The Chevrolet Vega is a subcompact automobile manufactured and marketed by GM’s Chevrolet division from 1970 until 1977. Available in two-door hatchback, notchback, wagon, and sedan delivery body styles, all models were powered by an inline four-cylinder engine designed specifically for the Vega, with a lightweight aluminum alloy cylinder block. The Vega first went on sale in Chevrolet dealerships on September 10, 1970. Variants included the Cosworth Vega, a short-lived limited-production performance version introduced spring 1975. The Vega received the 1971 Motor Trend Car of the Year. Subsequently, the car became widely known for a range of problems related to its engineering, reliability, safety, propensity to rust, and engine durability. Despite numerous recalls and design upgrades, Vega’s problems tarnished its reputation and that of General Motors. Production ended with the 1977 model year. The car was named for Vega, the brightest star in the constellation Lyra.

Get more information about: Chevrolet Vega

Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Chevrolet Model: Vega
Price: $33,000 Mileage: 82,344 mi.

3. **AMC Pacer**The AMC Pacer, released in 1975, was AMC’s bold answer to the compact car market, aiming for a futuristic design that prioritized interior space and visibility. Its distinctive, wide-bodied silhouette and expansive glass area were truly unconventional, making it one of the most polarizing designs of its era. There was simply no mistaking a Pacer for anything else on the road.

However, this unique styling came with significant compromises. The Pacer suffered from poor fuel economy, a critical drawback during the energy crisis of the mid-1970s. Furthermore, its engines were notably underpowered, struggling to move the Pacer’s substantial weight with any real urgency, which made for a rather uninspiring driving experience.

Compounding these issues were persistent quality control problems, which left many consumers unimpressed with the car’s overall execution. The Pacer’s unconventional looks, combined with its practical and performance deficiencies, prevented it from ever truly connecting with a broad consumer base, relegating it to cult status rather than mainstream success.

File:Breaking Bad Pontiac Aztek (30839293343).jpg – Wikimedia Commons, Photo by wikimedia.org, is licensed under CC BY 2.0

4. **Pontiac Aztek**When the Pontiac Aztek launched in 2001, it attempted to blend SUV utility with unique, adventurous styling. While it arrived much later than the other ‘classics’ on this list, its design decisions were so profoundly rejected that it quickly earned its place as one of the most derided American cars of modern times, demonstrating that design flaws are timeless.

The Aztek is almost universally criticized for its unattractive design, characterized by awkward proportions, excessive plastic cladding, and a rather ungainly stance. These aesthetic choices overshadowed any innovative features it possessed, such as a built-in cooler and an optional tent for camping, which were genuinely clever additions at the time.

Despite these attempts at versatility, the vehicle’s poor aesthetics and subpar driving performance ultimately led to its commercial failure. The Aztek became symbolic of Pontiac’s struggle to find its identity in the early 2000s, and many automotive historians point to it as a significant factor in the brand’s eventual decline, a stark reminder of the power of first impressions.

Car Model Information: 2005 Pontiac Aztek FWD
Name: Pontiac Aztek
Manufacturer: General Motors
Production: July 2000 – December 2004
Assembly: Ramos Arizpe
Designer: Tom Peters (chief designer: 1997)
Class: Mid-size crossover SUV
BodyStyle: SUV
Platform: GM U platform
Related: Buick Rendezvous
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout
Engine: General Motors 60° V6 engine#LA1,V6
Transmission: GM 4T65-E transmission,Automatic transmission
Wheelbase: 108.3 in (2,751 mm)
Length: 182.1 in (4,625 mm)
Width: 73.7 in (1,872 mm)
Height: 66.7 in (1,694 mm)
Weight: 3,779–4,043 lb (1,714–1,834 kg)
Predecessor: Pontiac Sunrunner
Successor: Pontiac Torrent
ModelYears: 2001–2005
Categories: All-wheel-drive vehicles, All articles needing additional references, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles needing additional references from October 2013, Articles with short description
Summary: The Pontiac Aztek is a mid-size crossover SUV marketed by General Motors introduced in 2000 for the model years 2001 through 2005. As a four-door crossover with front-wheel drive and optional all-wheel drive, the Aztek featured a four-speed automatic transmission with a V6 engine. Marketed by Pontiac as a “sport recreational vehicle,” the Aztek used a shortened platform shared with GM’s minivans (e.g., the Pontiac Montana) featuring 94 cubic feet of cargo room with its rear seats removed. The design employed conventional rear outswing doors rather than sliding doors, and a split rear tailgate, the lower section formed with seat indentations and cupholders. Other features included a front center console that doubled as a removable cooler, optional rear stereo controls in the cargo area, optional sliding cargo floor with grocery compartments, and optional camping package with an attachable tent and air mattress.

Get more information about: Pontiac Aztek

Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Pontiac Model: Aztek
Price: Not Priced Mileage: 125,965 mi.

5. **Ford Pinto**The Ford Pinto, introduced in 1971, initially gained popularity for its low price point and compact size, offering an economical option in a competitive market. However, its reputation became irrevocably marred by a dangerous design flaw that led to one of the most infamous safety scandals in automotive history. The small, unassuming car became a symbol of corporate negligence.

The Pinto’s fuel tank was positioned in a way that made it highly vulnerable to rupture and explosion in rear-end collisions. This design oversight, coupled with accusations that Ford knowingly delayed a recall to save costs, severely damaged the company’s reputation. The safety scandal resulted in significant legal and financial consequences for Ford and forever cast a shadow over the Pinto.

“The Pinto’s safety problems were more than headlines. Rear tanks could rupture in a crash, and Ford’s cost-cutting approach drew criticism that still echoes today,” as noted in the provided context. Even setting aside the profound safety issues, the base models came with underpowered four-cylinders, and its interiors were built to a strict budget, which undeniably showed in their execution and feel.

Car Model Information: 1980 Ford Pinto WAGON
Name: Ford Pinto
Caption: Ford Pinto
Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company
Aka: Mercury Bobcat
Production: September 1970 – July 1980
ModelYears: 1971–1980 (Pinto),1974–1980 (Bobcat)
Assembly: Edison, New Jersey,Milpitas, California
Designer: Robert Eidschun (1968)
Class: Subcompact car
BodyStyle: Sedan (automobile),sedan delivery,station wagon,hatchback
Related: #Mercury Bobcat (1974–1980),Ford Mustang (second generation)
Layout: Front-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout
Chassis: Unibody
Engine: unbulleted list
Abbr: on
Disp: Ford Cologne engine
Transmission: unbulleted list
Wheelbase: 94.0 in
Length: 163 in
Width: 69.4 in
Height: 50 in
Weight: convert
Predecessor: Ford Cortina#Mark II (1966–1970)
Successor: Ford Escort (North America)
Categories: 1980s cars, Articles with short description, Cars discontinued in 1980, Cars introduced in 1970, Commons category link from Wikidata
Summary: The Ford Pinto is a subcompact car that was manufactured and marketed by Ford Motor Company in North America from 1970 until 1980. The Pinto was the first subcompact vehicle produced by Ford in North America. The Pinto was marketed in three body styles throughout its production: a two-door fastback sedan with a trunk, a three-door hatchback, and a two-door station wagon. Mercury offered rebadged versions of the Pinto as the Mercury Bobcat from 1975 until 1980 (1974–1980 in Canada). Over three million Pintos were produced over its ten-year production run, outproducing the combined totals of its domestic rivals, the Chevrolet Vega and the AMC Gremlin. The Pinto and Mercury Bobcat were produced at Edison Assembly in Edison, New Jersey, St. Thomas Assembly in Southwold, Ontario, and San Jose Assembly in Milpitas, California. Since the 1970s, the safety reputation of the Pinto has generated controversy. Its fuel-tank design attracted both media and government scrutiny after several deadly fires occurred when the tanks ruptured in rear-end collisions. A subsequent analysis of the overall safety of the Pinto suggested it was comparable to other 1970s subcompact cars. The safety issues surrounding the Pinto and the subsequent response by Ford have been cited widely as business ethics and tort reform case studies.

Get more information about: Ford Pinto

Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Ford Model: Pinto
Price: $5,951 Mileage: 107,000 mi.

Chevrolet Corvair (1963–1969) — 1963 Chevrolet Corvair Monza 900 Spyder | Taken at the 2024 … | Flickr, Photo by staticflickr.com, is licensed under CC Zero

6. **Chevrolet Corvair**The Chevrolet Corvair, produced from 1960 to 1969, was a groundbreaking car for General Motors, daring to adopt a unique rear-engine design more commonly associated with European marques. While innovative, this design choice inadvertently led to significant handling issues that would ultimately define its controversial legacy and subject it to intense scrutiny.

The car became the central focus of Ralph Nader’s seminal 1965 book, “Unsafe at Any Speed: The Designed-in Dangers of the American Automobile,” which famously highlighted the Corvair’s safety concerns, particularly its propensity for oversteer. This public outcry sparked widespread debate and played a crucial role in bringing about significant changes in auto safety regulations across the industry.

The relentless negative publicity and the ensuing public concern over safety effectively overshadowed the Corvair’s genuinely innovative engineering and its more refined later models. Despite its technical ambition, the car’s tarnished image ultimately led to its discontinuation, illustrating the profound impact public perception and safety criticisms can have on even forward-thinking vehicles.

Car Model Information: 1964 Chevrolet Corvair Monza
Caption: 1964 Chevrolet Corvair Monza
Name: Chevrolet Corvair
Manufacturer: Chevrolet
Production: 1960–1969
Platform: GM Z platform
Chassis: Unibody
ModelYears: 1960–1969
Assembly: United States,Kansas City, Missouri,Oakland, California,Van Nuys,St. Louis,Flint, Michigan,Belgium,Canada,Mexico,South Africa,Switzerland,Venezuela
Class: Compact car
Successor: Chevrolet Vega
Layout: Rear-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout
Categories: All Wikipedia articles written in American English, All articles lacking in-text citations, All articles needing additional references, All articles with dead external links, All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
Summary: The Chevrolet Corvair is a rear-engined, air-cooled compact car manufactured and marketed by Chevrolet over two generations between 1960 and 1969. The Corvair was a response to the increasing popularity of small, fuel-efficient automobiles, particularly the imported Volkswagen Beetle and the success of American-built compacts like the Rambler American and Studebaker Lark. The first generation (1960–1964) was offered as a four-door sedan, two-door coupe, convertible, and four-door station wagon. A two- and four-door hardtop and a convertible were available second generation (1965–1969) variants. The Corvair platform was also offered as a subseries known as the Corvair 95 (1961–1965), which consisted of a passenger van, commercial van, and pickup truck variant. Total production was approximately 1.8 million vehicles from 1960 until 1969. The name “Corvair” was first applied in 1954 to a Corvette-based concept with a hardtop fastback-styled roof, part of the Motorama traveling exhibition. When applied to the production models, the “air” part referenced the engine’s cooling system. A prominent aspect of the Corvair’s legacy derives from controversy surrounding its handling, articulated aggressively by Ralph Nader’s Unsafe at Any Speed and tempered by a 1972 Texas A&M University safety commission report for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) which found that the 1960–1963 Corvair possessed no greater potential for loss of control in extreme situations than contemporary compacts. To better counter popular inexpensive subcompact competitors, notably the Beetle and Japanese imports such as the Datsun 510, GM replaced the Corvair with the more conventional Chevrolet Vega in 1970.

Get more information about: Chevrolet Corvair

Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Chevrolet Model: Corvair
Price: $29,988 Mileage: 74,787 mi.

7. **Cadillac Cimarron**In the early 1980s, Cadillac faced the challenge of a changing automotive landscape, with luxury import brands making inroads into the American market. Its response, the Cadillac Cimarron, introduced in 1982, was an attempt to enter the compact luxury segment. However, this effort largely backfired, becoming a textbook example of poor brand management and badge engineering.

The Cimarron was widely criticized for being little more than a poorly disguised and vastly overpriced version of the Chevrolet Cavalier. It shared its platform and many components with the economy car, offering minimal upgrades that did not justify its premium price tag. This lack of differentiation was a significant disappointment for brand loyalists and critics alike.

Cadillac’s attempt to simply rebadge a humble compact car and market it as a luxury vehicle failed spectacularly because it lacked the performance, luxury, and exclusivity that customers expected from the Cadillac crest. The Cimarron severely damaged Cadillac’s hard-earned reputation for quality and sophistication for years, and it is “often cited as one of the worst badge-engineering efforts in U.S. history.”

Continuing our journey through the less-than-stellar chapters of American automotive history, we now turn our attention to more examples of vehicles that, despite their potential, ultimately disappointed. These are the cars that suffered from compromised performance, persistent long-term reliability issues, and, in many cases, left a lasting negative impact on their respective brands and the broader automotive landscape.

8. **AMC Gremlin**The AMC Gremlin, launched in 1970, was a rather audacious attempt by American Motors Corporation to tap into the burgeoning subcompact market. It quickly became known for its incredibly odd design, characterized by a strikingly truncated rear end that polarized public opinion and made it an instant target for both criticism and jokes. While marketed as an affordable and economical option, its unconventional styling often overshadowed any practical appeal it might have offered.

Beyond its peculiar aesthetics, the Gremlin suffered from notable mechanical and build quality issues. Performance was generally unimpressive, even for its class, often struggling with basic tasks. The base model, equipped with a 3.3L inline-six, mustered a mere 100 horsepower, which was barely adequate for the car’s basic functionality and certainly not inspiring for drivers seeking any level of engagement.

These fundamental flaws, combined with questionable styling choices, meant the Gremlin never truly evolved beyond being a budget-friendly but deeply compromised option. It cemented its place in automotive lore more as a curiosity or a punchline rather than a truly revered classic, further reinforcing its status as one of the cars that missed the mark significantly.

“1981 Chevrolet Citation” by harry_nl is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

9. **Chevrolet Citation**Introduced in 1980, the Chevrolet Citation represented a pivotal moment for General Motors, aiming to usher in a new era of modern, front-wheel-drive compact cars. It arrived with considerable anticipation, as GM intended it to be a cutting-edge answer to foreign imports and the evolving demands of the American consumer. Initially, sales were strong, suggesting a successful launch for this ambitious new platform.

However, the Citation’s early promise quickly unraveled due to a litany of severe mechanical issues that plagued the model. Drivers frequently reported significant brake problems, ranging from premature wear to outright failures that compromised safety and confidence. Transmission failures were also a recurring nightmare, leading to costly repairs and extensive downtime for owners.

Despite its initial market enthusiasm, the Citation’s reputation plummeted rapidly as these pervasive reliability issues and numerous recalls became public knowledge. It became synonymous with the pitfalls of rushed development and inconsistent quality, ultimately leaving a lasting stain on Chevrolet’s image and serving as a cautionary tale of how quickly consumer trust can erode.

10. **Oldsmobile Diesel**The decision by Oldsmobile to offer diesel engines in the late 1970s and early 1980s proved to be nothing short of a disaster for the brand. In an effort to respond to the energy crisis and increase fuel efficiency, these engines were unfortunately adapted from existing gasoline engine designs, a fundamental misstep that would have profound consequences for their reliability and performance. This engineering shortcut would define their notoriety for years.

These Oldsmobile diesel engines became infamous for a host of critical problems. Owners consistently reported poor performance, with many finding the power delivery sluggish and unsatisfying. More critically, frequent breakdowns and exceptionally high maintenance costs quickly turned the dream of fuel efficiency into a financial burden, as repairs often outstripped any savings at the pump. The engines simply weren’t robust enough for diesel operation.

The widespread backlash from these notoriously unreliable engines severely damaged Oldsmobile’s hard-earned reputation for quality and engineering. The catastrophic failure of Oldsmobile’s diesel initiative contributed significantly to the broader decline in the popularity of diesel-powered passenger cars across the U.S., proving that even well-intentioned innovations can backfire spectacularly if not executed flawlessly.

11. **Plymouth Volaré**The Plymouth Volaré, along with its Dodge Aspen sibling, made its debut in 1976 and initially garnered a warm reception from the automotive press and consumers alike. Praised for its comfortable ride and a respectable array of features for a compact car, it seemed poised to be a strong contender in its segment, offering a compelling blend of practicality and value.

Yet, this initial goodwill was short-lived, as the Volaré rapidly developed an unenviable reputation for profound build quality issues. Rust problems were particularly rampant and severe, often appearing much faster than expected and quickly degrading the car’s aesthetic and structural integrity. Furthermore, a litany of general reliability issues, combined with poor assembly practices, led to numerous widespread recalls.

These persistent and fundamental flaws quickly tarnished the image of Chrysler’s compact cars, casting a long shadow over both the Volaré and Aspen. What began as a promising new line ultimately became synonymous with disappointment and unreliability, underscoring the critical importance of long-term durability in securing a lasting place in the hearts of drivers.

1978 Ford Mustang II King Cobra Hatchback | Bright Red. The … | Flickr, Photo by staticflickr.com, is licensed under CC BY 2.0

12. **Ford Mustang II**The Ford Mustang II, produced from 1974 to 1978, arrived on the scene at a time of significant upheaval in the automotive world, specifically during the throes of the 1973 oil crisis. Ford’s decision to downsize the iconic Mustang and shift its focus towards fuel efficiency was a direct response to these market pressures. This strategic pivot, however, led to a car that was fundamentally different from its muscle-bound predecessors.

Enthusiasts, who had come to expect raw power and aggressive styling from the Mustang nameplate, quickly criticized the Mustang II for its bland design and profoundly lackluster performance. Sharing its platform with the economy-minded Ford Pinto, the base model came with a meager 2.3L inline-four engine pushing out an underwhelming 88 horsepower. Even the optional V6 engine struggled significantly to move the car with any real urgency, leaving a substantial void where the legendary Mustang attitude and muscle once resided.

For collectors and purists, the Mustang II represents a low point in the venerable Mustang’s long and storied history. Its questionable build quality, coupled with a performance envelope that was far removed from its heritage, made it less desirable. The limited parts support for these models further deters restoration efforts, ensuring it remains an era many Mustang fans prefer to overlook, a stark reminder of adapting too drastically to market whims.

Car Model Information: 2020 Audi Q5 45 Premium
Name: Second generation
Caption: Ford Mustang II coupe
Aka: Ford Mustang II , Ford T5 (in Germany)
Class: Pony car,Subcompact car
Production: 1973–1978
ModelYears: 1974–1978
Predecessor: Ford Mustang (first generation)
Successor: Ford Mustang (third generation)
Assembly: Unbulleted list
Layout: Front-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout
BodyStyle: coupé,hatchback
Related: Ford Pinto,Ford Pinto
Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company
Engine: ubl
Transmission: ubl
Wheelbase: cvt
Length: cvt
Width: cvt
Height: cvt
Designer: Buck Mook, Dick Nesbitt
Categories: All articles with dead external links, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles with dead external links from April 2024, Articles with permanently dead external links, Articles with short description
Summary: The second-generation Ford Mustang, marketed as the Ford Mustang II, is a two- or three-door, four-passenger, front-engine/rear-drive pony car manufactured and marketed by Ford from 1973 until 1978. Introduced in September 1973 for the 1974 model year, the Mustang II arrived roughly coincident with the oil embargo of 1973 and subsequent fuel shortages. Developed under Lee Iacocca, it was an “entirely new kind of pony car.” Ford “decided to call it Mustang II, since it was a new type of pony car designed for an era of high gas prices and fuel shortages.” The Mustang II was 490 lb (222 kg) lighter and almost 19 in (483 mm) shorter than the 1973 Mustang, and derived from the subcompact Pinto platform. While sharing a limited number of driveline components with the Pinto, the Mustang II employed an exclusive subframe, isolating its front suspension and engine mount subframe. The steering used a rack-and-pinion design. Named Motor Trend’s 1974 Car of the Year and reaching over 1.1 million sales over four years of production, the Mustang II is noted simultaneously for both its marketing prescience and strong sales – while criticized as having abandoned essential aspects of the Mustang heritage and described, in a retrospective after 40 years since its introduction, as embodying the Malaise era.

Get more information about: Ford Mustang (second generation)

Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Ford Model: Mustang II
Price: $20,955 Mileage: 51,510 mi.

13. **Buick Reatta**When the Buick Reatta launched in 1988, it entered the market as a distinctive luxury two-seater, representing Buick’s attempt to offer a more exclusive and personal grand touring experience. The car showcased advanced technology for its time and boasted a level of craftsmanship intended to evoke a sense of refined American luxury, setting it apart from the brand’s more traditional offerings.

However, the Reatta struggled significantly to capture the interest of the broader luxury market, often facing criticism on several key fronts. Its high price point placed it in direct competition with more established and performance-oriented luxury sports cars, where the Reatta’s comparatively modest power output and lack of outright sportiness became noticeable liabilities.

The 3.8-liter V6, while reliable, offered only 170 horsepower, which was often perceived as a lack of power for a car positioned as a premium two-seater. This, combined with its limited practicality and a market that was perhaps not ready for such an exclusive Buick, meant the Reatta’s advanced features and careful construction were ultimately overshadowed by its struggle to find its niche, leading to disappointing sales and a relatively short production run.

Car Model Information: 1990 Buick Reatta 2dr Convertible
Name: Buick Reatta
Manufacturer: General Motors
Related: Buick Riviera#Seventh generation (1986–1993),Oldsmobile Toronado#Fourth generation (1986–1992),Cadillac Eldorado#Eleventh generation (1986–1991)
Production: 1988–1991
Chassis: unibody
Platform: GM E platform
BodyStyle: coupe
Engine: Buick V6 engine#Pre-Series I,V6 engine
Designer: Dave McIntosh (1983)
Transmission: Turbo-Hydramatic 125#Turbo-Hydramatic 440-T4,automatic transmission
Wheelbase: 98.5 in
Abbr: on
Length: 183.7 in
Width: 73.0 in
Height: 51.2 in
Weight: 3377 lb
Assembly: Lansing, Michigan
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout
Class: Grand tourer
Caption: 1988 Buick Reatta coupe
Categories: 1990s cars, Articles with short description, Buick vehicles, Cars discontinued in 1991, Cars introduced in 1988
Summary: The Buick Reatta is a low-volume transverse front-engine, front-wheel drive, two-door, two-seater grand tourer manufactured and marketed by Buick as a coupe (1988–1991) and convertible (1990–1991) — both featuring a 3.8 liter V6 engine and shortened version of the GM E platform, shared with the seventh generation Buick Riviera. As Buick’s first two-seater and its first convertible since the 1985 Riviera, the Reatta was manufactured in a highly specialized assembly program at the Reatta Craft Center (later known as the Lansing Craft Center) in Lansing, Michigan—achieving production of over 21,000 units in four years.

Get more information about: Buick Reatta

Buying a high-performing used car >>>
Brand: Buick Model: Reatta
Price: $23,000 Mileage: 5,843 mi.

1989 Chrysler TC by Maserati ‘6KFY257’ 1 | Photographed at t… | Flickr, Photo by staticflickr.com, is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0

14. **Chrysler TC by Maserati**The Chrysler TC by Maserati, introduced in 1989, was conceived as an ambitious transatlantic collaboration between two automotive titans. The goal was to blend Italian design flair and exotic allure with American production capability, promising a luxury personal car that would embody the best of both worlds. However, this grand vision spectacularly failed to impress, delivering a car that was neither truly Maserati nor a compelling Chrysler.

The car was quickly and widely criticized for being vastly overpriced, failing to deliver the performance and genuine luxury that customers expected from a vehicle bearing the Maserati name. A significant contributing factor to this perception was its undeniable mechanical kinship with the much cheaper Chrysler LeBaron, sharing too many components and underlying architecture to justify its premium cost and exclusivity claims. It simply lacked the bespoke feel necessary for its price tag.

This fundamental mismatch between branding, pricing, and actual execution led to remarkably poor sales figures and a very short production run. The Chrysler TC by Maserati became a poignant example of how a collaborative effort, despite noble intentions and prestigious names, can falter if it loses sight of its core identity and fails to meet the elevated expectations it inadvertently creates.

As we conclude our examination of these ‘classic’ American cars that, for various reasons, missed the mark, a clear theme emerges. While nostalgia might paint a golden hue over automotive history, many vehicles, even those from revered brands, were plagued by fundamental design flaws, underwhelming performance, and chronic reliability issues right from the assembly line. These aren’t just stories of vehicles; they are valuable lessons in engineering, marketing, and the fickle nature of public perception. They stand as enduring testaments to the fact that not every car becomes a cherished icon, and some are better left admired from a safe, and perhaps historically informed, distance.”

Car Model Information: 2020 Audi Q5 45 Premium
Name: Chrysler TC by Maserati
Manufacturer: Maserati,Chrysler (division)
Production: 1988–1990
ModelYears: 1989–1991
Class: Grand tourer
Layout: Front-engine, front-wheel-drive layout
Predecessor: Imperial (automobile)#Sixth generation (1981–1983)
Successor: Chrysler Crossfire
Platform: Chrysler Q platform
BodyStyle: convertible
Engine: Chrysler 2.2 & 2.5 engine#Turbo II,Chrysler 2.2 & 2.5 engine#TC,Mitsubishi 6G7 engine#6G72
Transmission: manual transmission,TorqueFlite,Ultradrive
Weight: 3033 lb
Abbr: on
Wheelbase: 93.3 in
Length: 175.8 in
Width: 68.5 in
Height: 51.9 in
Assembly: Torino,Sparone,Milan
Categories: 1990s cars, All articles with unsourced statements, Articles with short description, Articles with unsourced statements from August 2025, Articles with unsourced statements from March 2021
Summary: The Chrysler TC by Maserati is a two-passenger, two-door convertible jointly developed by Chrysler and Maserati. Introduced at the 1986 Los Angeles Auto Show., the TC was positioned as a grand tourer using a “Q” body on a modified second-generation Chrysler K platform. After two years of development delays, the TC became available in late-1988 and a total of 7,300 units (the minimum required under the contract) were manufactured in Milan, Italy, through 1990. All cars sold as 1991 models were manufactured in 1990.

Get more information about: Chrysler TC by Maserati